Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?




Photo - - - - -

Planning Windows 8: SKUs

This is always a touchy subject. As many of you have witnessed with Windows Vista, some people within the company felt that it was a good idea to overcomplicate SKUs and extort money from people by offering 'Ultimate Extras', which turned out to be not so ultimate at the end of the day...

Moving on, however, we simplified SKUs with Windows 7, but we want to take it a few steps further with Windows 8. Within Microsoft, things that should be low in number are high, and things that are high in number should be low. To paraphrase, we wish to narrow down SKUs to match the KIN sales figure of 2. What this means is that, while we're still going to have VL/Enterprise edition, and a version of Windows to throw at developing nations as one feeds leftover scraps on their plates to pets, we're going to only have 2 versions of Windows that will be widely available.

Of course, the matter of deciding on SKUs will also bring us to the topic of x64 vs. x86. Unfortunately, due to lazy developers, lazy hardware manufacturers, and lazy people, we cannot push x64 to be entirely mainstream at this point without isolating markets (e.g. netbooks). We're getting there, however, as adoption for 64-bit machines have been on an uprise.

Anyways, without further ado, here are the Windows 8 SKUs:

Windows 8 Home - Tailored towards home users (in case you thought something different from its name), this will be the general version of Windows 8. It will pack all of the features home users need, which we obviously cannot disclose at this point. In order to support those on older machines, or form factors which require x86, this SKU will be available in both x86 and x64 flavors. It will be priced at $59 per copy, with a family pack available 24/7/365 priced at $100 for 4 PCs.

Windows 8 Professional - Containing features targeted towards businesses and enthusiasts, Professional will be the version of 8 for those who want it all. This version of Windows will be x64-exclusive. Radical decision, you say? While it's excusable for Joe Black to use an x86 machine, it is not acceptable for any self-respecting business. Windows 8's projected RTM date is in 2012. 20-****ing-12.

The only businesses that won't be able to adopt Windows 8 due to this shift are those that still run IE6, with an "IT staff" on payroll using work time and resources to masturbate to tentacle porn all day instead of making beneficial decisions that will bolster security and productivity for these businesses. The same goes for enthusiasts. If you like Windows, you like building PCs, then why would you run an x86 OS in 2012?

Professional will be priced at $100 per copy. Not only due to the additional features, but because we don't want consumers to purchase Professional only to shoot themselves in the foot with the tools reserved for more savvy users.

And that's it. That's all that's needed for mainstream SKUs.

--Steven



Thats all thats needed but we all know it wont be made. There will be an ultimate edition since professional is never the full package. and people will want home premium and home just so they have something to whine about when they get the wrong one.
Home Basic (in terms of 7, not Vista) only made sense for graphics-challenged PCs (pretty much netbooks and legacy PCs, and darn few legacy PCs that were desktops).
Home Premium (again in terms of 7, not Vista) made nearly as little sense except that it replaced XP Professional outside of businesses.
Professional, on the other hand, should have stayed either as a corporate-only SKU (similar to Enterprise) or replaced Home Premium as a business/retail SKU. (If Professional had gone corporate-only, Enterprise should have been dropped.)
Ultimate would have remained as it was (bitness-neutral).

Windows 8 will be an evolution, not revolution. I like the two-SKU idea; however, let's take things one step further - Home should only be sold either with new PC hardware or as OEM software. Further, Home cannot be used to upgrade PCs shipping wiith older versions of Windows. The retail version of Windows 8 will be the Professional SKU (which replaces all retail SKUs available today) and (like Server 2008 R2 today) will be x64-only. (8 Profesional will also be available to OEMs and through Software Assurance/MSDNAA.)

Included with both Windows 8 SKUs will be Office 15 Home and Business/Student (in the case of Windows 8 Professional, it will be on the second DVD, as opposed to a separate-but-free download as it would be for those that purchase OEM/preloaded copies of 8 Home).


Home OEM/System Builder would be dual-media/bitness; however, preload/courtesy-copy DVDs would be x64-only.

Why allow x32 8 Home through the OEM channel at all? For upgrades to those legacy PCs runing Windows 7 x32 today. (Note that the Files and Settings Transfer Wizard, which is used to move files and settings from older versions of Windows, will remain available.)

8 Professional shoud also include a superset of today's Windows Virtual PC, but based on MAP-V, as standard. (There are very few processors that don't support hardware virtualization today; there may well not be any by the time 8 ships.) Again, 2008 R2 set a precedent; it includes MAP-V as standard fare.

Office 15 retail SKUs should be x64-only.

No 8 x32 in the retail channel? Quite frankly, why? Any computer running 7 x32 can stay there, as there would be little reason for this vanishing breed to upgrade to 8 (hardware upgrades, such as motherboards, would enable the purchase of 8 x64 via the System Builder/OEM route, as is the case with 7 today). If you replace the motherboard in a PC running 7 x32, it will be darn near certain that said motherboard will use an x64 CPU; why would you hobble that CPU with an x32 OS if at all avoidable?


OEM/System Builder copies of 8 (both Home and Professional) would be $149. (A deliberate *disincentive* for purchasing x32 even through the OEM channel, since Professional, which includes Office Home and Business/Student, would be the same price. The Files and Settings Transfer Wizard works today for crossgrades from x32 to x64.)






Quote

If you like Windows, you like building PCs, then why would you run an x86 OS in 2012?

Well right now the main reason is because the support for x64 drivers is not that great yet... let's hope by 2012 it will be better :yes:

0sm3l, on 27 December 2010 - 02:32, said:

Quote

If you like Windows, you like building PCs, then why would you run an x86 OS in 2012?
Well right now the main reason is because the support for x64 drivers is not that great yet... let's hope by 2012 it will be better :yes:

If you want that, you might as well tell Microsoft to drop the whole 32bit support. You'll still get crappy 64bit support.
I really dont think Win7 needed 4 or 5 versions. All you need is home, pro and a business/enterprise.
I still can't understand why they essentially swapped the naming (or useage, depending on how you look at it) of Starter and Home Basic between Vista and 7. In Vista (and XP for that matter), Starter was the version sold in developing countries, while Home Basic in Vista was for low end computers in first-world countries. With 7 though, Home Basic is sold in developing countries and Starter is sold in first-world countries on low end computers (primarily netbooks). It seems that they swapped them just for the hell of it, because there is no other LOGICAL reason to do it.
I don't think Windows 8 need so many SKUs. They should have 4 versions: Windows 8 Home Premium (Home), Professional/Enterprise (Corporation) and Ultimate (Gamers). Also Microsoft should drop 32bit support and make 64bit Windows mainstream.
Good news they're going 64bit only for Windows 8 Professional! Am definitely for this sort of move. So many CPU's now are 64bit.. it's definitely the right time to be doing this!

May 2013

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122 23 2425
262728293031 

Recent Entries

Recent Comments

Categories