Closed Topic Topic Options
Rating 2 V 5 Pages V   [1] 2 3 ... Next : Last » 
Muslim Massacre game pulled, along with a genuine apology?
The Canadian
Post #1 Sep 15 2008, 14:15


Resident Elite
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 1,089
Joined: 3-June 08
From: Canada
Member No.: 253,827
This is in regards to my post: Does "Muslim Massacre" game show a need for Internet regulation?

Muslim Massacre is a game which puts players in control of a soldier whose mission it is to rid the world of every last Muslim. Nice. The Internet-only game caused controversy amongst the Muslim population and has now been pulled from the website. In its place is a grovelling apology from the creator of the game. But is it genuine or merely some cowardly backtracking?

Last week saw Muslim Massacre get some mainstream and very public attention after it became an Internet meme. What started as a forum post pointing people towards the game turned in to a media circus, with newspapers and websites all around the world attacking the idea of the game and its creator, Sigvatr.

The game was Web-only, with poor graphics, and so really shouldn’t have got the amount of attention it did. Unfortunately, the subject matter was such that it was always bound to grab the headlines. While some believed it was intended as a parody of American foreign policy, others believed it to be just a downright sick game likely to add to the problem of Islamophobia.

I argued that whatever the message being sent at the heart of the game, it should be allowed to exist, merely because by calling for it to be banned, it would mean we are calling for the Internet to be policed and censored. In the end, a ban wasn’t necessary, as the game’s website now sports an apology instead of the game itself.

Quote -
I would like to make a public apology for any offense that I might have caused through releasing this game, and to Muslims in particular. My intentions when releasing this project were to mock the foreign policy of the United States and the commonly held belief in the United States that Muslims are a hostile people to be held with suspicion. I would like to make it clear that I have never shared such a belief and my intention was to mock those who actually do believe these things.

I would like to ask for the forgiveness of Muslims around the world and to make it clear that I did not release this game with ill intent. So without further ado, I would like to say that I am truly apologetic for what I have done and will take full responsibility for all offense that has been caused. I can only hope that any further misgivings can be laid to rest.


The apology seems genuine enough, and it is certainly well written. And removing the game is noble. The problem is that once something has been released on the Internet, it’s pretty much guaranteed to be on there until the end of time. If you look in the right place, you’ll still be able to play Muslim Massacre and see what all the fuss was about.

I’m glad the creator of the game eventually saw the light and took the right decision. However, I’m still struggling to understand why the game was created and put on the Web in the first place.



Source: Various Sites
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page Email Poster

Log In or Register · Advertise on Neowin
ApuBo
Post #2 Sep 15 2008, 14:20


Neowinian²
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 157
Joined: 4-February 08
From: Greenland
Member No.: 247,020

edit: didnt read xD sry
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page
njlouch
Post #3 Sep 15 2008, 14:23


Neowinian Super Star
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 22,705
Joined: 14-January 03
From: Leicester, UK
Member No.: 21,654
Self censoriship would work in an ideal world, except for the following:

In an ideal world there would be no need for censorship.
In an ideal world we wouldn't have to deal with idiots.
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page Email Poster
spacer
Post #4 Sep 15 2008, 14:41


There's a crayon in my brain?
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 3,380
Joined: 9-November 06
From: Connecticut, USA
Member No.: 186,719
The game just screams controversy. It should never have been published by the creator, and any mature, intelligent person would have known better.

I agree that the internet should remain free from censorship though, some people just need to grow thicker skin.
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page Email Poster
The_Decryptor
Post #5 Sep 15 2008, 14:41


NUMERO MYSTERIOSO
Group Icon
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 14,078
Joined: 28-September 02
From: Brisbane, Australia Likes: Cookies
Member No.: 17,647
Quote - (njlouch @ Sep 16 2008, 00:23) *
Self censoriship would work in an ideal world, except for the following:

In an ideal world there would be no need for censorship.
In an ideal world we wouldn't have to deal with idiots.

It's a real shame we'll never be able to get rid of the idiots.
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page Email Poster
afusion
Post #6 Sep 15 2008, 14:50


Neowinian Senior
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 2,046
Joined: 10-July 08
From: North America
Member No.: 255,423
geh I don't really care anymore..

If he hates Muslims that's his problem.
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page
vetNTUsEr
Post #7 Sep 15 2008, 15:40


Resident Elite
Group Icon
Group Icon

Group: vetVeteran
Posts: 1,231
Joined: 12-July 01
From: Boston
Member No.: 33
He Caved in. blah
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page Email Poster
Nose Nuggets
Post #8 Sep 15 2008, 15:57


Resident Elite
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 1,530
Joined: 4-August 04
Member No.: 65,113
there is nothing ever that should require " Internet regulation". i don't care if the guy made a game about raping toddlers. if that's what he wants to do, that's his prerogative. if you don't like it, go someplace else.
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page Email Poster
morcey
Post #9 Sep 15 2008, 15:57


Neowinian
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 8
Joined: 18-September 02
Member No.: 17,124
Man, what a waste of time to post the game and then get to pull it out. Wasn't even productive at all.

The apology seems well explained as what were his intentions but it seems to be a sensitive topic when you get religion in the way.

This post has been edited by morcey: Sep 15 2008, 16:05
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page Email Poster
bigmehdi
Post #10 Sep 15 2008, 16:01


Neowinian³
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 299
Joined: 11-February 07
Member No.: 203,846
This game is worthless, anyway.
The concept might be funny somehow.
I would have called this game "irak invasion",
and instead of the instruction "kill as many muslim as you can",
I would have put "kill as many innocent civils as you can, Then take the petrol".
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page
ichi
Post #11 Sep 15 2008, 16:10


Akihabara Style
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 2,369
Joined: 20-December 04
Member No.: 86,755
Quote - (bigmehdi @ Sep 15 2008, 18:01) *
I would have called this game "irak invasion",
and instead of the instruction "kill as many muslim as you can",
I would have put "kill as many innocent civils as you can, Then take the petrol".


Just play America's Army.
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page
godzila
Post #12 Sep 15 2008, 16:11


Neowinian²
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 103
Joined: 1-October 06
From: дебелја&
Member No.: 182,340
http://forum/index.php?showtopic=669980 hahahah this is ok who put the link not correctly ??????? tongue.gif
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page Email Poster
solardog
Post #13 Sep 15 2008, 16:11


The new green is the old red.
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 1,275
Joined: 15-December 06
From: Saratoga, Ca., USA
Member No.: 190,930
Quote - (bigmehdi @ Sep 15 2008, 09:01) *
This game is worthless, anyway.
The concept might be funny somehow.
I would have called this game "irak invasion",
and instead of the instruction "kill as many muslim as you can",
I would have put "kill as many innocent civils as you can, Then take the petrol".

Wow, you need to upgrade your veiled attacks...that one is so 2004. passifier.gif
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page
godzila
Post #14 Sep 15 2008, 16:14


Neowinian²
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 103
Joined: 1-October 06
From: дебелја&
Member No.: 182,340
heheh OBAMA its great changing all worlds.....
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page Email Poster
bigmehdi
Post #15 Sep 15 2008, 16:21


Neowinian³
Group Icon

Group: Registered
Posts: 299
Joined: 11-February 07
Member No.: 203,846
@solardog
Quote -
Wow, you need to upgrade your veiled attacks...that one is so 2004.

killing muslims is more 2008, you are right.

@godzila
yes, seems there's great expectations about Obama.
Although I don't know him particularly well.
Profile Card PM + Reply to Post Go to the top of the page
« Older · Back Page News · Newer »
5 Pages V   [1] 2 3 ... Next : Last »   Closed Topic