terroradagio Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 These are my personal benchmarks. No system or software changes except OS build difference. 3DMark06 7057: 15415 7048: 15296 3DMark05 7057: 20334 7048: 19824 3DMark03 7057: 46229 7048: 46195 I did bench Vantage, but forgot to save results. I can tell you 7057 is faster than 7048 for me also in Vantage. I did have builds 7000 and 7022 installed and they performed roughly the same. In order fastest to slowest for me in the builds I have used: 7057 *Fastest 7022 7000 7048 *Slowest I hope the results of 7057 keep getting better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadrack Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 7000 and 7022 perform roughly the same as 7057? I'm confused... is 7057 a step forward in terms of performance, or was 7048 a step backwards? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terroradagio Posted March 18, 2009 Author Share Posted March 18, 2009 7000 and 7022 perform roughly the same as 7057? I'm confused... is 7057 a step forward in terms of performance, or was 7048 a step backwards? Sorry, I guess I should have been more specific. 7000 and 7022 perform roughly the same in terms of performance. I don't have hard numbers for them saved. 7057 is a step up in performance from them though. 7048 is the worst build in terms of performance from my findings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Udedenkz Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 Interesting. Somewhat on topic: I have a performance question for dual booters: I got 97.8 MB/S in HDTUNE with Windows 7 and 130 MB/S in XP. Has anyone else noticed a 25% drop in read speed from SSD/HDs in 7 compared to XP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inctye Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 7000 and 7022 perform roughly the same as 7057? I'm confused... is 7057 a step forward in terms of performance, or was 7048 a step backwards? I think the biggest performance difference are for computers with average hardware specs, like what I am running in my sig, rather than a high-end quadcore and graphics. For me, 7000-->7048 was a huge jump and I think most people can say the same. But 7048-->7057 is still up in the air. Startup seems to be a little slower, which is reasonable to expect considering the tinkering they did with the logon wallpaper and they have not taken the time to reoptimize the code again. There does not seem to be any difference with normal computer usage like opening documents and surfing the internet. At best, maybe slightly faster. Hard to say for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts