jami_welch
Jan 9 2005, 19:04
i'm looking at headphones to replace the ones that came with my mp3 player and saw good reviews for the PX200's.
i looked on amazon and found them, along with the Px100 and was wondering what is the difference between them and what experiences have people had of these 'phones?
cheers
jami_welch
Jan 9 2005, 20:52
bump?
jami_welch
Jan 10 2005, 17:09
clumpy lumpy bump?
Hypoxiaicon
Jan 10 2005, 17:11
I have the PX100's for my MP3 Player (Zen Mirco)
They sound amazing
Nissel
Jan 10 2005, 17:14
PX100 are open, so should sound better.
PX200 are basicly the same but closed, quieter for other people but wont sound quite so good.
i haven't tried either tho.. that was just from their specs and what i know about open and closed headphones.
sdkaneda
Jan 10 2005, 17:17
PX100's are generally thought to sound better than 200's. the 200's are a closed design but they lack the surface area to seal around the ear.
i urge you to check out the senn PMX-60 neck-worn headphones too. they sound excellent, look excellent (dunno if that's an asset to you though) and are very inexpensive!
jami_welch
Jan 10 2005, 17:20
thanks for the replies, it's jus that the 100's are cheaper, what is the difference between ope and closed?
jami_welch
Jan 10 2005, 17:35
okay wth a bit more research i think i'll go with the 100's thanks all
sdkaneda
Jan 10 2005, 17:49
google it
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.