ripgut
Apr 26 2005, 20:16
You, know, i know it. We all see it from time to time. yes i am talking about the "Server is too busy to handle your requests" screen. And to tell you the truth i am getting sick and tired of it.
Main reason:
When i wanna provide some help in the hardware hangout, i can't because "the server is too busy to handle your requests." this gets tiresome, i am seeing more and more subscribers everyday ( or is it just me

) I seem to be getting this error more often as of late. WHY? i don't know, maybe it's just me thinking that or it really is getting bogged down more and more often, I know neowin wants to grow and this community is the best on the internet.
So I'm thinking.. ( and bear with me here) either lockdown the forums to only registered members. (this i dont myself wholeheartedly agree with but i figure what the hay

)
OR: can we donate some more funds to help remedy this? I know Neowin uses a boatsized load of bandwidth per month and on Sundays i know that, that is "Backup day"
I personally wouldn't mind at all to help in donating more funds to do my part in getting rid of this problem.
what do you guys think?
Lockdown the forums for only registered members? or donate extra to help
I go with the second choice.
Adrian
Apr 26 2005, 20:20
What about if there was another type of subscriber group where they pay X of amount money a month or year and they get put on a different server to the current main ones, the "subscriber server" and the money the subscriber pays goes to maintaining the "subscriber server" ? and therefore subscribers won't have to deal with server busy messages as they are on a totally different server.
QUOTE(Adrian @ Apr 26 2005, 14:20)
What about if there was another type of subscriber group where they pay X of amount money a month or year and they get put on a different server to the current main ones, the "subscriber server" and the money the subscriber pays goes to maintaining the "subscriber server" ? and therefore subscribers won't have to deal with server busy messages as they are on a totally different server.
[right][snapback]585833641[/snapback][/right]
thats the last thing neowin needs. to divide its content amongst subscribed and unsubscribed members.
Sophism
Apr 26 2005, 20:29
what about getting a donation account setup, and upgrade to a hell of a lot better server..
(cough timdorr)
Adrian
Apr 26 2005, 20:30
QUOTE(Matt @ Apr 26 2005, 21:27)
thats the last thing neowin needs. to divide its content amongst subscribed and unsubscribed members.
[right][snapback]585833686[/snapback][/right]
Just add another server, seeing how neowin already have 2 http servers i think, just put a 3rd in for subscribers, and they use the same database server
QUOTE(Xiphias @ Apr 26 2005, 21:29)
what about getting a donation account setup, and upgrade to a hell of a lot better server..
(cough timdorr)
[right][snapback]585833700[/snapback][/right]
http://www.neowin.net/aboutus.php
lunamonkey
Apr 26 2005, 20:33
I didn't know about the donate button, cool

Edit : I've just donate 10 euros. Every little helps.
ripgut
Apr 26 2005, 20:35
QUOTE(lunamonkey @ Apr 26 2005, 13:33)
I didn't know about the donate button, cool

[right][snapback]585833726[/snapback][/right]
Me neither
Sophism
Apr 26 2005, 20:36
k well an upgraded server should be looked into.
as ive suggested in the past let people donate a small sum of money, for those who cannot afford the 13 dollars, have a donater tag or something similar to the subcsriber tag. i appreciate the admins for not litering neowin with outrageous ads, but i think the only way to free up the server usage is to slender down, more so, the forums for non registered members. i understand that sigs and such are disabled but maybe going a step furter. maybe another version of neowin will be less forum-like, for non members, and more similar to a news site. i dont know if this can be done with IVB but know it can be accomplished with vbulletin, but i know neowin is proud of its accomplishment of being the largest IVB on the net so i doubt they would do such a thing.
QUOTE(Xiphias @ Apr 26 2005, 16:36)
k well an upgraded server should be looked into.
[right][snapback]585833740[/snapback][/right]
Upgraded from the 3 we already have?
ripgut
Apr 26 2005, 20:44
QUOTE(Xiphias @ Apr 26 2005, 13:36)
k well an upgraded server should be looked into.
[right][snapback]585833740[/snapback][/right]
It's not the hardware of the server, they jsut upgraded hardware not too long ago. and added another, It's the bandwidth thats slowing neowin down. I think uploading images should be a no no, maybe that will help. with site like imageshack.us, imagebarrel.com and theres more and more popping up everyday theres no reason to upload images and add to the congestion.
Adrian
Apr 26 2005, 20:45
QUOTE(Xiphias @ Apr 26 2005, 21:36)
k well an upgraded server should be looked into.
[right][snapback]585833740[/snapback][/right]
Mon3y doesnt grow on trees
QUOTE(Adrian @ Apr 26 2005, 14:45)
Mon3y doesnt grow on trees

[right][snapback]585833795[/snapback][/right]
just one server is
only 250-300 dollars a month (and they have 3).
Adrian
Apr 26 2005, 20:59
QUOTE(Matt @ Apr 26 2005, 21:54)
just one server is
only 250-300 dollars a month (and they have 3).

[right][snapback]585833844[/snapback][/right]
is that directed at me?
Just another point to my other little point, just say theres a seperate group where you pay $5 a month to be put on a seperate server. There would be atleast 50 people out of the 91,648 registered members that would do that (including me), thats already $250 a month. And also that server wont have to be pimped out.
MateoGWJ
Apr 26 2005, 21:10
You can throw 50 servers at the problem, won't mean a thing if there is a bottleneck connection side. It's all about badnwidth.
I agree with rip on this: as much as the images allow everyone's individuality to be expressed, I'd rather bann sig images, etc., to make the most efficient use of the hardware and bandwidth the site has.
Adrian
Apr 26 2005, 21:12
QUOTE(MateoGWJ @ Apr 26 2005, 22:10)
You can throw 50 servers at the problem, won't mean a thing if there is a bottleneck connection side. It's all about badnwidth.
[right][snapback]585833927[/snapback][/right]
Surely bandwidth has nothing to do with serverload

And you could have 50 servers all load balanced to distribute the load efficiently, each having their own connection.
ripgut
Apr 26 2005, 21:16
It's members like
this that slow down neowin
I';m not talking about banning sigs, since there hotlinked unlike avatars that can be uploaded im talking about pics, uploading them need to be stopped or something
lunamonkey
Apr 26 2005, 21:16
QUOTE(MateoGWJ @ Apr 26 2005, 22:10)
You can throw 50 servers at the problem, won't mean a thing if there is a bottleneck connection side. It's all about badnwidth.
I agree with rip on this: as much as the images allow everyone's individuality to be expressed, I'd rather bann sig images, etc., to make the most efficient use of the hardware and bandwidth the site has.
[right][snapback]585833927[/snapback][/right]
Sigs are off site though. So that wouldn't matter. Some avatars however are on site.
As well as attached images. Like mine ^. /me Hypocrite.
M2Ys4U
Apr 26 2005, 22:10
maybe forcing all unregistered users to use the lite skin (or one with less images) when browsing the forum.
Less images = less hits = les server strain and bandwidth used
Rob.Baker
Apr 27 2005, 22:52
QUOTE(ripgut @ Apr 26 2005, 17:16)
It's members like
this that slow down neowin
I';m not talking about banning sigs, since there hotlinked unlike avatars that can be uploaded im talking about pics, uploading them need to be stopped or something
[right][snapback]585833959[/snapback][/right]
I PM'ed that guy and told him that its his fault that neowin is falling to peices.
dtechy
Apr 27 2005, 23:06
V.V. Funny Mr Baker
QUOTE(ripgut @ Apr 27 2005, 07:16)
It's members like
this that slow down neowin
I';m not talking about banning sigs, since there hotlinked unlike avatars that can be uploaded im talking about pics, uploading them need to be stopped or something
[right][snapback]585833959[/snapback][/right]
QUOTE
No Flaming, Personal attacks such as flaming, instigating "flame bait", verbal abuse or mocking of members in forum posts are not tolerated at Neowin. Such posts will be deleted on sight and moderated accordingly. If you are a long standing member, act like one. Lead by example and assist other newer members rather then attacking them. We look upon our veteran members to use this opportunity to teach the newer members the appropriate way to use these message boards.
Let's start blaming people for Neowin's supposed slowness

Your high post count would increase the size of the database more than his hotlinking to images on other servers
By the way, I have not seen a server is busy error in well over 6 months now.
ripgut
Apr 27 2005, 23:47
Ferret
Apr 28 2005, 00:11
I always assumed most images are hosted offsite, apart from some avatars...
I will have to take a closer look at IPB to see if you can force unregistered users to view the 'Lite' version.
But does anyone know whats causing the problem, bandwidth, or the internals of the Servers ?
Techy_
Apr 28 2005, 01:11
Concidering that you are seeing the 'Server load is too High' message or what ever it is, then its the server. If it was the bandwidth then you wouldn't see anything.
I have seen the messages too.
As far as I know, the "Server to buys messages" is related to the MySQL database. Which if I am correct is hosted on a different server aside from mail and images and HTML.
M. Seth
Apr 28 2005, 01:14
Please don't flame....but I did hear rumors at one point that some big sites switching to using vbulletin forums because of the server issues.
Don't know if thats true?
My personal opinion is to do away with all uploads to the neowin servers and make everything be hotlinked.
Honestly because I am a subscriber and do support neowin I keep the ad server adblocked by firefox and I almost never get server errors. Don't know if that is related or not?
shockz
Apr 28 2005, 03:35
QUOTE(AthleticTrainer1981 @ Apr 27 2005, 21:14)
Please don't flame....but I did hear rumors at one point that some big sites switching to using vbulletin forums because of the server issues.
Actually thats one of the reasons why we switched from VB to IPB back in 1.0 and 1.1
Don't know how IPB 2.0 holds up when compared to VB 3.0, but I'm sure its still better. The servers would come to a hault completely when VB was on here.
M. Seth
Apr 28 2005, 04:00
QUOTE(shockz @ Apr 27 2005, 22:35)
Actually thats one of the reasons why we switched from VB to IPB back in 1.0 and 1.1
Don't know how IPB 2.0 holds up when compared to VB 3.0, but I'm sure its still better. The servers would come to a hault completely when VB was on here.
[right][snapback]585840564[/snapback][/right]
Actually I did know that NW switched from VB to IPB a long time ago. I just wonder what the comparisons are between IPB 2 and VB 3 in terms of server relibility?
shockz
Apr 28 2005, 04:07
QUOTE(AthleticTrainer1981 @ Apr 28 2005, 00:00)
Actually I did know that NW switched from VB to IPB a long time ago. I just wonder what the comparisons are between IPB 2 and VB 3 in terms of server relibility?
[right][snapback]585840655[/snapback][/right]
True... it'd be an interesting thing to see.
cswadner
Apr 28 2005, 04:14
QUOTE(AthleticTrainer1981 @ Apr 27 2005, 18:14)
.......
My personal opinion is to do away with all uploads to the neowin servers and make everything be hotlinked.
Honestly because I am a subscriber and do support neowin I keep the ad server adblocked by firefox and I almost never get server errors. Don't know if that is related or not?
[right][snapback]585840047[/snapback][/right]
Much agreed. Hotlink everything and reduce the size of any posted images/elimate entirely
username
Apr 28 2005, 05:11
you think WinHEC had anything to do with it?
IceDogg
Apr 28 2005, 05:15
Just a little note on the subject of sigs and Avatars. If you feel they slow down Neowin, do what I do turn them off. I don't know if it helps or not, but I hate seeing all the (basicly) ads, so I turned them off.
I been trying to access neowin for the last 10 minutes
I still say lock the forums to guests and disable image uploading
QUOTE(ripgut @ May 2 2005, 19:52)
I been trying to access neowin for the last 10 minutes
I still say lock the forums to guests and disable image uploading

[right][snapback]585862086[/snapback][/right]
i think locking the forums to guests is a pretty drastic move for neowin, especially since it's trying to encourage a bigger better community.
disabling image uploading is probably the best method.
edit: and this is another problem. it shouldn't quote images.
QUOTE
My personal opinion is to do away with all uploads to the neowin servers and make everything be hotlinked.
Well said
.Kompressor
May 2 2005, 21:14
no problems with banning images in sigs..
or better yet. Subscribers get to use images but non-paying don't could be another incentive.
Some kind of hotlinking server... Timdorr could make uploaded files go on another server...
EDIT: Fixed typo in
uploaded
.Kompressor
May 2 2005, 22:18
^ has a good point.
keep the website and database separate from the uploads. on separate machines..
Another thing, to keep the HTTP response headers low in size, you can always remove a few headers ->
QUOTE
http://checkmyip.info returned:
0. HTTP/1.1 200 OK
1. Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 22:38:37 GMT
2. Server: Apache
3. Connection: close
4. Content-Type: text/html
QUOTE
http://neowin.net returned:
0. HTTP/1.1 200 OK
1. Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 22:40:06 GMT
2. Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_gzip/1.3.26.1a mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2 mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.10 mod_ssl/2.8.22 OpenSSL/0.9.7a
3. X-Powered-By: PHP/4.3.10
4. Set-Cookie: neolite=deleted; expires=Sun, 02-May-04 22:40:05 GMT
5. Set-Cookie: main_theme=blue; expires=Tue, 02-May-06 22:40:06 GMT; path=/
6. Set-Cookie: set_id=4; expires=Tue, 02-May-06 22:40:06 GMT; path=/
7. Connection: close
8. Content-Type: text/html
You could hide the X-Powered-by header (In php.ini, you have the option to remove this, set
expose_php = Off)
And you can aswell lower the Server (SERVER_SOFTWARE) header by entering
ServerTokens Prod (Prod[uct] only) in httpd.conf
QUOTE(ripgut @ Apr 26 2005, 15:35)
Me neither

[right][snapback]585833734[/snapback][/right]
It's always been there, but they didn't want to annoy people with "donate now!" stuff, so you have to look if you want to find it.
QUOTE(Chode @ Apr 27 2005, 18:44)
Let's start blaming people for Neowin's supposed slowness

Your high post count would increase the size of the database more than his hotlinking to images on other servers
By the way, I have not seen a server is busy error in well over 6 months now.
[right][snapback]585839688[/snapback][/right]
Geez. Why are you always so cranky? He was just pointing out that some people's sigs are part of the problem. Guess what? He's right.
Eta: I see server is busy messages here every few days.
QUOTE(Bhav @ May 2 2005, 16:01)
i think locking the forums to guests is a pretty drastic move for neowin, especially since it's trying to encourage a bigger better community.
disabling image uploading is probably the best method.
edit: and this is another problem. it shouldn't quote images.
[right][snapback]585862769[/snapback][/right]
So delete the image when you quote. Isn't difficult.
Biggest way to help is to click on the adverts. Takes a few seconds and it goes towards the cost of running the site, of corse if everyone does this there will be more cash avalable for better services at the datacenter that should help neowin run better.
itsnotabigtruck
May 12 2005, 01:29
How about just switching from hosting to your own server? If Neowin has 3 servers and each is $400/month, that's $1200/month total.
Neowin could get Verizon FTTP 30mbit for $200/month and lay down ~$3000 for 3 servers and the servers would pay for themselves as opposed to be previous system.
Prasanth
May 12 2005, 03:49
QUOTE(yisman @ May 3 2005, 09:52)
Geez. Why are you always so cranky? He was just pointing out that some people's sigs are part of the problem. Guess what? He's right.
[right][snapback]585864735[/snapback][/right]
I don't think sigs contribute much to the server load
shockz
May 12 2005, 04:00
QUOTE(yisman @ May 3 2005, 00:22)
Geez. Why are you always so cranky? He was just pointing out that some people's sigs are part of the problem. Guess what? He's right.
Eta: I see server is busy messages here every few days.
[right][snapback]585864735[/snapback][/right]
Sigs aren't a problem. They are remotely hosted... unless they were uploaded as an attachment and then that would be a problem. If you see sigs hosted on Neowin... inform us and we will remove them.
AgEnTsMiTh
May 12 2005, 04:02
Locking the forums to members and not guest is something that is never going to happen.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.