Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Canon 100mm macro vs. 60mm
Neowin Forums > Recreational Activities > The Media Room > Digital Camera Lab
accesser
http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/Canon%20EO...-report--review
http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/Canon%20EO...-report--review
Does anybody own either lens I’m looking to get a macro but I’m not sure what to get.

I’d like to be able to use it for light box work the extra reach of the 100mm is probably not needed but I’m still open to either lens.

Suggestions welcome
giga
I've heard great things about both--just get whichever you can according to your budget. Look at the Tamron 90mm Macro as well for a cheaper option.
accesser
thumbs_up.gif Cheers, I like the size and spec of the 60mm now I just have to stop spending money so I can afford one its on my list of must haves
moloko
I do like the 60mm too but would want to see how close it can get. I'm not a fan of a long lens like the 100mm.
BvZ
I had the same problem a while ago and after some searching on google i stumbled onto the following site with a pretty nice review of both lenses
60mm: http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/60mm-macro.htm and 100mm: http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/100mm-macro.htm
After reading both reviews i decided to go with the 100mm lens.
SirEvan
im not a canon guy, but I will tell you this...the 100 will allow you to be further away from your subjects, so better for insect photography and stuff, but the 60 (I have the nikon 60mm macro) works beautifully for flowers and other objects.
Pink Floyd
Quote - (SirEvan @ Jan 22 2008, 21:11) *
im not a canon guy, but I will tell you this...the 100 will allow you to be further away from your subjects, so better for insect photography and stuff, but the 60 (I have the nikon 60mm macro) works beautifully for flowers and other objects.
Exactly!  That is why I enjoy more shooting with a 105mm over  a 60mm
bloodrain
100 all the way
Diffused Mind™
With these macro lenses, can they be used to take regular non-macro pictures?
giga
Quote - (Diffused Mind™ @ Jan 22 2008, 20:58) *
With these macro lenses, can they be used to take regular non-macro pictures?

Yep, makes some great bokeh. (portraits and such)
Diffused Mind™
Quote - (giga @ Jan 22 2008, 22:00) *
Yep, makes some great bokeh. (portraits and such)


Hm, may have to look into one of these for my D50. I can hear my wallet crying.
accesser
Thanks for the tips and links guys thumbs_up.gif
SirEvan
Quote - (Diffused Mind™ @ Jan 22 2008, 18:02) *
Hm, may have to look into one of these for my D50. I can hear my wallet crying.


60mm's can be had for under 200$...especially if you find one used...they're pretty good deals.
o0moonman0o
one is efs and one is ef, pick whichever fits ur future bodies, eg. fullframe, 1 series only use ef
moloko
Very true moonman. I know look at this when I thinking of new lenses. Eventually I will be moving to 5D or what ever is out at that time.
mitch41
My friend is looking at getting a new camera setup, and I told him not to get the 60 mm because it is sub-frame...
But then I found a VERY expensive but beautiful lens...
$829.00 Canon MP-E 65mm 1-5x Macro Lens
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews...ens-Review.aspx
There's a review for it...


and here's a great review for the 100 mm.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews...ens-Review.aspx
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.