simon360
Jun 9 2008, 19:18
Well, I had a little catch on apple.com on their mobileme page...

Look familiar? Yup, that's Firefox. Not Safari, which a year ago Apple essentially vowed to wipe off the face of the earth (remember that pie chart?).
I just found it interesting, but it begs a question: is Apple giving up on Safari for Windows in its current form?
http://www.apple.com/mobileme/Also worth noting, http://www.apple.com/safari/ now mentions the PC version more as an aside; that is, there is now only a screenshot of Safari for Mac. The only noticeable mention of a PC version is in the small text under "Download". Sorry, it shows the screenshot based on the user agent.
http://digg.com/apple/Apple_shows_Firefox_on_MobileMe_page
zer0day
Jun 9 2008, 19:20
I hope so. Safari is just....****.
Hurmoth
Jun 9 2008, 19:20
I doubt they're giving up on it. I'm going to assume that the person who took that photo just got fired.
I did just send that to the web team for correction.
simon360
Jun 9 2008, 19:56
Digg link in first post, someone on IRC recommended it.
SkyyPunk
Jun 9 2008, 20:01
Quote - (simon360 @ Jun 9 2008, 15:56)

Digg link in first post, someone on IRC recommended it.
dugg 4 u
Dugg also

But maybe it's just to emphasise that the laptop is running Vista?
simon360
Jun 9 2008, 20:10
Could be, but Apple's been pushing their branding very hard. I doubt they're giving up on Safari, but they might've realized that theming it like OS X isn't the way to go. At least I hope they have.
No matter what, it's either an interesting slip up or an interesting move on Apple's part.
shakey_snake
Jun 9 2008, 20:11
Quote - (simon360 @ Jun 9 2008, 15:18)

I just found it interesting, but it begs a question: is Apple giving up on Safari for Windows in its current form?
I still don't think Apple ever seriously intended Safari to be widely used on non-macs. But they had to play it as so in order to get Web Developers not to ignore Safari when designing web pages.
Software market share on Windows is much more competitive.
Besides, unlike iTunes, there's no money to be made in the Web Browser world.
Couch Potato
Jun 9 2008, 20:20
Wonder who's going to be fired over this.
PureLegend
Jun 9 2008, 20:21
Quote - (shakey_snake @ Jun 9 2008, 21:11)

I still don't think Apple ever seriously intended Safari to be widely used on non-macs. But they had to play it as so in order to get Web Developers not to ignore Safari when designing web pages.
Yes. IMO Safari on Windows is solely for developers.
Quote - (shakey_snake @ Jun 9 2008, 21:11)

I still don't think Apple ever seriously intended Safari to be widely used on non-macs. But they had to play it as so in order to get Web Developers not to ignore Safari when designing web pages.
Software market share on Windows is much more competitive.
Besides, unlike iTunes, there's no money to be made in the Web Browser world.
Are you kidding me? How do you think Mozilla have been able to fund Firefox?
Though that search box that have at the top, and how the default homepage is Google. (This may be different if you import your IE settings however, never done that myself.)
If they wanted it to look more like Vista, then they should've used IE tbh.
I really don't think it matters. As pointed out, I think Apple was simply making it clear that they were showing off Vista. And who knows, maybe people assume that if they see Safari, it's Mac OS X, regardless of what the user interface looks like.
Quote - (Cara @ Jun 9 2008, 12:23)

I did just send that to the web team for correction.

There's nothing to correct.
The point of the ad is that MobileMe will work on any platform in almost any environment. They've announced they will officially support IE7, FF2 & Safari 3 and higher ... the ad is simply displaying that in a graphic.
What a silly thread.
simon360
Jun 9 2008, 20:45
Quote - (Quillz @ Jun 9 2008, 18:10)

I really don't think it matters. As pointed out, I think Apple was simply making it clear that they were showing off Vista. And who knows, maybe people assume that if they see Safari, it's Mac OS X, regardless of what the user interface looks like.
But if they were showing off Vista, why wouldn't they use IE7? People recognize that more than they recognize Firefox.
Quote - (Quillz @ Jun 9 2008, 21:40)

I really don't think it matters. As pointed out, I think Apple was simply making it clear that they were showing off Vista. And who knows, maybe people assume that if they see Safari, it's Mac OS X, regardless of what the user interface looks like.
Yeah, I was thinking on the same line here.
Nothing to stop someone on OSX putting a Vista wallpaper on. They probably could've avoided this by including the task bar, and perhaps putting the computer on the right instead of the left so that we can see the start button.
Tantawi
Jun 9 2008, 20:49
I'd rather use Internet Explorer 6 than Safari on Windows

.
neufuse
Jun 9 2008, 20:51
Or did the graphics desing people at Apple just make a mistake? always have to take the most complex answer dont we?
hmm, I downloaded Safari two days ago and I love it..
Everyone to their own opinion.
shakey_snake
Jun 9 2008, 21:25
Quote - (simon360 @ Jun 9 2008, 16:45)

But if they were showing off Vista, why wouldn't they use IE7? People recognize that more than they recognize Firefox.
To promote Web Standards.
kraized
Jun 9 2008, 21:27
Watch the Guided Tour video. There are close-ups of FF on Vista.
funciona
Jun 9 2008, 21:57
Thats Firefox?
Quote - (kraized @ Jun 9 2008, 22:27)

Watch the Guided Tour video. There are close-ups of FF on Vista.
I only see Safari?
soLoredd
Jun 9 2008, 22:04
Quote - (Fusion @ Jun 9 2008, 12:43)

There's nothing to correct.
The point of the ad is that MobileMe will work on any platform in almost any environment. They've announced they will officially support IE7, FF2 & Safari 3 and higher ... the ad is simply displaying that in a graphic.
What a silly thread.
Agreed. And for someone who works for Apple to submit it for correction is pretty funny. I'll bet the response is same as yours. "We are showing that MobileMe can be used on the Windows platform in another browser."
It's a good thing Apple only has these conferences twice a year. Because twice a year the community shows how dumb it can be at any given moment. People just do not understand the point, nor the history of these conferences.
Fusion
Jun 10 2008, 00:30
Quote - (soLoredd @ Jun 9 2008, 15:04)

Agreed. And for someone who works for Apple to submit it for correction is pretty funny. I'll bet the response is same as yours. "We are showing that MobileMe can be used on the Windows platform in another browser."
It's a good thing Apple only has these conferences twice a year. Because twice a year the community shows how dumb it can be at any given moment. People just do not understand the point, nor the history of these conferences.
Yeah, given this thread and its absurdity I'm surprised no one's sending reports into the web team like this: OMG OMG OMG WTF your new ad has a PC in it!!!?!?!?! Aren't these the very PC's that you have essentially vowed to wipe off the face of the earth? OMG FIX IT NOWWWW!!!!"
The_Decryptor
Jun 10 2008, 02:34
Quote - (shakey_snake @ Jun 10 2008, 06:11)

I still don't think Apple ever seriously intended Safari to be widely used on non-macs. But they had to play it as so in order to get Web Developers not to ignore Safari when designing web pages.
Software market share on Windows is much more competitive.
Besides, unlike iTunes, there's no money to be made in the Web Browser world.
Fun thing to think about.
when Safari was mac only, it had more combined users than Opera on Windows, Linux and Mac.
Now it runs on windows, it's got even more.
Hell-In-A-Handbasket
Jun 10 2008, 02:52
its on the Mobileme section for PC also, it looks like FF anyway
Click to view attachment
And it's not just the photo's, it's also in all of the tours. So basically Apple has to redo almost everything on the MobileMe pages...
Mathachew
Jun 12 2008, 14:00
I like how they show off the product on Vista Basic
Safari isn't even a good browser on OSX, so more FF is fine by me...
Commodore Max
Jun 12 2008, 14:04
Quote - (1759 @ Jun 12 2008, 15:01)

Safari isn't even a good browser on OSX, so more FF is fine by me...
Agreed.
simon360
Jun 12 2008, 14:06
I dunno, I'm a huge fan of Safari on OS X, and can't stand Firefox (even the RC builds of Firefox 3). It's exactly the opposite on Windows.
I think they are acknowledging the fact that Safari is the worst browser on Windows
Quote - (Mathachew @ Jun 12 2008, 10:00)

I like how they show off the product on Vista Basic

Anything to show Vista down, typical apple.
I noticed this the other day. Although it wasn't just on this page, it was on another page of Apple.com promoting MobileMe, where you could clearly see a full browser window of Firefox on Windows Vista... so unless they've updated the page a bit or there is another page aswell?
----------------
Now playing on iTunes:
Ian Van Dahl - Castles In The Skyvia
FoxyTunes
Wolfie Zero
Jun 19 2008, 12:04
I think the odd thing is that Apple aren't showing Windows with IE rather than FF or Safari.
We are all aware that Safari is very much developer based; I love it on Mac, but my work PC it's shocking how unstable it is.
But again, it would make more sense to show off it in IE on PC and Safari on Mac. Use the native browsers in all.
The_Decryptor
Jun 19 2008, 12:17
Quote - (Mathachew @ Jun 13 2008, 00:00)

I like how they show off the product on Vista Basic

Or they could just have Glass disabled.
It was disabled for me (on Ultimate) after I installed my graphics card drivers (for some reason)
Mathachew
Jun 19 2008, 12:32
Quote - (The_Decryptor @ Jun 19 2008, 07:17)

Or they could just have Glass disabled.
It was disabled for me (on Ultimate) after I installed my graphics card drivers (for some reason)
I noticed the same was done on
Firefox's page. Perhaps these are all run on virtual machines? I just fail to see why they'd use such an ugly GUI over Aero.
Wolfie Zero
Jun 19 2008, 22:14
Quote - (Mathachew @ Jun 19 2008, 13:32)

I noticed the same was done on
Firefox's page. Perhaps these are all run on virtual machines? I just fail to see why they'd use such an ugly GUI over Aero.
I work in Web Development, but I think everybody is the same that when developing IMHO; Aero just seems to hog a lot of resources and just slows things down. I had to set up a laptop for a demo, but it was brand new with Vista on it; rather than take the time and downgrade to XP, I just turned off all the fancy Vista UI stuff to get it running the same speed as XP running all the functional-fancy UI stuff.
rofl got to love it how they are running it in vista basic and not aero
GreyWolfSC
Jun 19 2008, 22:39
Quote - (Wolfie Zero @ Jun 19 2008, 18:14)

I work in Web Development, but I think everybody is the same that when developing IMHO; Aero just seems to hog a lot of resources and just slows things down. I had to set up a laptop for a demo, but it was brand new with Vista on it; rather than take the time and downgrade to XP, I just turned off all the fancy Vista UI stuff to get it running the same speed as XP running all the functional-fancy UI stuff.
DWM.exe is using 48MB on my system right now and flying. How is that a resource hog?
Quote - (GreyWolfSC @ Jun 19 2008, 23:39)

DWM.exe is using 48MB on my system right now and flying. How is that a resource hog?
Maybe not in terms of RAM usage, but in terms of having to utilize other hardware such as your CPU/GPU also? I use Vista myself to test work on IE7 and turn all the visual effects off too, so I can allocate the machine less resources, most certainly including RAM.
Quillz
Jun 20 2008, 00:25
Quote - (Steve @ Jun 19 2008, 15:54)

Maybe not in terms of RAM usage, but in terms of having to utilize other hardware such as your CPU/GPU also? I use Vista myself to test work on IE7 and turn all the visual effects off too, so I can allocate the machine less resources, most certainly including RAM.
You're missing the point. Aero Glass uses the GPU for hardware accleration, as it should. I'm one of those rare people, you know, that would rather have the hardware I purchased be put to good use. On XP, the GPU wasn't used properly, and all the visual effects taxed your CPU.
There's a reason Snow Leopard will be moving to more hardware acceleration, as well.
Mathachew
Jun 20 2008, 02:27
Quote - (Wolfie Zero @ Jun 19 2008, 17:14)

I work in Web Development, but I think everybody is the same that when developing IMHO; Aero just seems to hog a lot of resources and just slows things down. I had to set up a laptop for a demo, but it was brand new with Vista on it; rather than take the time and downgrade to XP, I just turned off all the fancy Vista UI stuff to get it running the same speed as XP running all the functional-fancy UI stuff.
Others have already chimed in, but I want to as well. Aero is no resource hog and tests have proven this. Does it consume more resources? Yes. How much more? An insignificant amount. I'm in web development as well and love working on my Vista machine, but my work machine is XP and I would rather it not be. To each his own I guess, but it's obvious they neglected to use Aero for whatever reason. It's not a big deal, so meh.
Quote - (Quillz @ Jun 20 2008, 01:25)

You're missing the point. Aero Glass uses the GPU for hardware accleration, as it should. I'm one of those rare people, you know, that would rather have the hardware I purchased be put to good use. On XP, the GPU wasn't used properly, and all the visual effects taxed your CPU.
There's a reason Snow Leopard will be moving to more hardware acceleration, as well.
How am I missing the point, when I clearly mentioned utilizing alternative hardware such as both the CPU &
GPU? Maybe I know more about Windows, than you do Mac OS X, if you're really trying to make me believe Snow Leopard is really delivering the oh so long awaited hardware acceleration to Aqua.
The_Decryptor
Jun 20 2008, 13:07
Beaten like a dead horse, but...
Quote - (Wolfie Zero @ Jun 20 2008, 08:14)

I work in Web Development, but I think everybody is the same that when developing IMHO; Aero just seems to hog a lot of resources and just slows things down. I had to set up a laptop for a demo, but it was brand new with Vista on it; rather than take the time and downgrade to XP, I just turned off all the fancy Vista UI stuff to get it running the same speed as XP running all the functional-fancy UI stuff.
By turning off Aero, you're actually making your CPU do more work, which will slow down software rendering (like Firefox is doing)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.