Borimol
Jun 22 2008, 13:04
Deleted because this is an English Page
caerma
Jun 22 2008, 13:08
Looks like IE is not that bad...
alpha_omega
Jun 22 2008, 13:09
Could we get the tables in ENGLISH, por favor?
Also, this is a pretty damn unfair comparison. IE 7 is ancient compared to the other browsers. Try IE 8.
HoochieMamma
Jun 22 2008, 13:14
Quote - (caerma @ Jun 22 2008, 23:08)

Looks like IE is not that bad...
If you could read the language it's saying "lower is better" with all those IE7 bars which are 10 miles long.
Borimol
Jun 22 2008, 13:14
Quote - (C++ @ Jun 22 2008, 15:10)

Could we get the tables in ENGLISH, por favor?
Source is only in spanish, use google to translate
HoodiBoY
Jun 22 2008, 13:17
Thanks For the Info.........!!!!
Rightnow I am Using FF3...!!!!Viewing this report i am thinking of shifting to Opera 9.5....!!!
Quote - (Borimol @ Jun 22 2008, 08:14)

Source is only in spanish, use google to translate
Link to Google
image translator, please?
Lasker
Jun 22 2008, 13:21
The obvious winner: Safari
- Kaboose -
Jun 22 2008, 13:25
Quote - (HoodiBoY @ Jun 22 2008, 16:17)

Thanks For the Info.........!!!!
Rightnow I am Using FF3...!!!!Viewing this report i am thinking of shifting to Opera 9.5....!!!
don't be easily fooled by a couple of numbers slapped onto a graph
Mouldy Punk
Jun 22 2008, 13:26
Curious to know, is the Safari version being tested on a Mac or a PC? Last time I checked, the PC version was absolutely awful. That was a while ago though, so they may have upped their game a bit now.
dysmatik
Jun 22 2008, 13:35
I still prefer Firefox overall.
Reasons:
- open source
- extensions
- works on every O.S. I use
- highly customizable
- portable
- long time user of mozilla products
The numbers are important, but for me the overall experience using the software outweighs some of these factors.
ViperAFK
Jun 22 2008, 13:36
Quote - (- Kaboose - @ Jun 22 2008, 09:25)

don't be easily fooled by a couple of numbers slapped onto a graph
Opera 9.5 IS slightly faster than firefox 3, but not really enough to switch as the only reason.
Borimol
Jun 22 2008, 14:00
Quote - (C++ @ Jun 22 2008, 15:20)

Link to Google image translator, please?
Are you
illiterate to write the text of the pictures in Google?
Quote - (Borimol @ Jun 22 2008, 15:00)

Are you illiterate to write the text of the pictures in Google?
Umm, this is an English website, so why are you posting stuff written in Spanish in the first place? And why rip the graphs from a site and claim them as your own (Reviews
by Members for Members)? Go somewhere else if you want to cause trouble.
Quote - (acxz @ Jun 23 2008, 09:31)

Umm, this is an English website, so why are you posting stuff written in Spanish in the first place? And why rip the graphs from a site and claim them as your own (Reviews by Members for Members)? Go somewhere else if you want to cause trouble.
Forget it, you won't get anywhere... Why do you think I stopped trying?
Quote - (C++ @ Jun 23 2008, 14:33)

Forget it, you won't get anywhere... Why do you think I stopped trying?
You're right. I'll drop it ;)
sanctified
Jun 23 2008, 13:39
As I said earlier, Firefox has the best framework but these studies clearly state that both Opera and Safari uses the best rendering engines.
I'd be curious to see WebKit thrown in there...
100/100 on Acid3, faster than Safari 3.1 on rendering, (for those who care about it) Open Source...
sanctified
Jun 23 2008, 13:44
Quote - (Cara @ Jun 23 2008, 07:42)

I'd be curious to see WebKit thrown in there...
100/100 on Acid3, faster than Safari 3.1 on rendering, (for those who care about it) Open Source...
In all fairness Cara these graphics compare stable builds.
It would be interesting a set of graphics comparing beta engines.
Quote - (sanctified @ Jun 23 2008, 06:44)

In all fairness Cara these graphics compare stable builds.
It would be interesting a set of graphics comparing beta engines.
True. Ironic though that the engine behind Safari 3.1.1 is probably the (second) oldest of that group behind ID.
sanctified
Jun 23 2008, 13:51
Quote - (Cara @ Jun 23 2008, 08:48)

True. Ironic though that the engine behind Safari 3.1.1 is probably the (second) oldest of that group behind ID.

Check your pm inbox
ozzy76
Jun 23 2008, 13:56
Quote - (C++ @ Jun 22 2008, 14:10)

Also, this is a pretty damn unfair comparison. IE 7 is ancient compared to the other browsers. Try IE 8.
People would then question why compare final software against beta software, you can't have it both ways.
use IE7, "too old"
use IE8, "but, it's a beta"
sanctified
Jun 23 2008, 13:57
Quote - (ozzy76 @ Jun 23 2008, 08:56)

People would then question why compare final software against beta software, you can't have it both ways.
use IE7, "too old"
use IE8, "but, it's a beta"
Thats why I think it would be interesting to have a beta comparison. I think IE8 would stand a lot better. In al honestly the future for web browsers its interesting if not bright.
Deletedforeverhaha
Jun 23 2008, 19:11
I love how snappy Opera feels. When I scroll down a page, it feels so smooth and responsive. However, Firefox is the winner since it provides an addon for anything I want.
Does anyone know how to setup Firefox settings to match Opera's auto scrolling and smooth scrolling settings?
John S.
Jun 23 2008, 19:17
- Not your review
- Not in English
I see no reason to leave this open.
thread closed
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.