Men (or women) who decide to get on bended knee: Be warned. You could find yourself on both knees, facing a judge instead of a justice of the peace.

That’s what happened in Florida this week, when a woman was awarded $150,000 after suing her former fiancé for calling off their wedding.

For RoseMary Shell, the jilted bride-to-be who left a high-paying job in Pensacola to live with her prospective partner in Gainesville, there was a “wow” in lieu of a vow.

“[I was] a little bit [surprised], but I was thrilled,” Shell told TODAY’s Meredith Vieira on Friday. “But I felt like justice was really done.”

For Wayne Gibbs, the ex-fiancé, a case of cold feet came at a price.

“Mr. Gibbs feels that the verdict did not accurately reflect the evidence and will appeal,” Hammond Law, Gibbs’ attorney, told TODAY in a statement. “In addition, there are significant legal questions to address, including, but not limited to, whether or not breach of promise to marry is a viable action under Georgia law in 2008.”

From bliss to diss
It was 2001 when Shell and Gibbs, who were each divorced with grown children, met through mutual friends and began dating.

According to Shell, the couple had intended to get married when her youngest son went off to college in 2005. When that didn’t happen, she broke up with Gibbs and moved to Pensacola, where she landed a human resources job that paid $81,000 with benefits. Trying to carry on with her life, she started to date someone new.

But in October 2006, Gibbs asked her to move back to Gainesville — and he proposed with a 2-carat diamond ring. Shell said yes. A wedding date of Dec. 2 was set.

About a month after Shell moved back in with Gibbs, however, Gibbs expressed second thoughts in a note he left in their bathroom: He wanted to postpone the wedding.

Gibbs and Shell stayed together a few more months before officially parting in March 2007. Shell chose to take legal action and sued three months later.

“Primarily because he made a promise to me and I relied on that promise and gave up a lot of things because of that promise,” Shell explained.

“And I suffered significantly for it,” she added. “I just felt like people shouldn’t be allowed to do people that way.”

During the three-day trial, Shell testified that she had given up a good salary with benefits to move back with Gibbs. In her current job, in the accounting department at North Georgia College and State University, Shell is making $31,000 a year.

Gibbs testified that he took Shell on several skiing trips during their renewed partnership, made house payments for her, and gave her $30,000 to pay off some of her credit-card debt. He claimed he got cold feet after learning she had even more debt.

Shell disputed that Gibbs was unaware of her overall debt of $42,000. “It’s simply not true,” Shell told Vieira. “We discussed my debts before I left Florida. We discussed my debts when I came back from Florida. He had a list. He knew exactly what I owed. That’s all just kind of a smokescreen.”

A precedent?
After hearing the case, a Hall County jury awarded Shell $150,000 on Wednesday.

Lydia Sartain, Shell’s attorney, said her only reservations about taking on the case were over the “conservative” nature of area residents who might make up the jury.

“We really debated quite extensively whether to bring the case,” Sartain said. “But we just felt so strongly that in this case he had told her to quit her job and she relied on his promise. He came to her in Florida and moved her back into his house, took steps above and beyond the usual ‘Will you marry me, let’s plan a wedding’ and then somebody backs out.”

“Really, we believe now that he never intended to follow through on the promise to marry,” Sartain added.

Sartain also told Vieira that she hopes the case sets a precedent that an engagement can be a binding contract: “When you give your word to do something and you cause people to rely on it to their detriment, then you may be held accountable for any damages that you cause.”

As for her engagement ring, which she displayed to Vieira and TODAY viewers, Shell said she does not know the value — but she will try to sell it.

“It means nothing now,” she said.

You guys do know that he was also cheating on her right? He told her to quit her job and move in and goes to marry her then only leaves her a note and cheats on her?

On the news here in NY it was also stated that he cheated on her.

You cant right away blame the woman in this.

Also what is the amountshe sued for. If She only sued for $150,000 it sounds like she only sued for a year or two salary.

Women are such leeches. Any reason to get money from a man. Figures this would happen in my state. Note to self, use more sarcasm than usual when I do propose.

The money was not for the cost of the wedding. The money is because he convinced her, under a promise of marriage, to quit her job and move to his state. Without this settlement she would have been screwed.

He sounds like a user. Good for her on standing up for herself.

The money was not for the cost of the wedding. The money is because he convinced her, under a promise of marriage, to quit her job and move to his state. Without this settlement she would have been screwed.

same **** happened to a girl-friend of mine .. she literally got dumped on the stps of the church when she(the bride at that point in time) found out (right there) that he slept with his secretary at work for about 2 months and to top it off ... he aparently loved her (the secretary) ....

mind you these stupid things (portrayed in the moves are funny) but in real life, this girl is not really messed up per say ... but she lost it completelly ... now ... she talks to me but is nore of a veggie if you know what i mean .....

I agree he's an ass, but you only get used if you let someone use you. He had already broken a previous promise to marry her, she should have been more cautious.

For some reason, that made me laugh because of how stupid the situation is... Amazing.

You guys do know that he was also cheating on her right? He told her to quit her job and move in and goes to marry her then only leaves her a note and cheats on her?

On the news here in NY it was also stated that he cheated on her.

You cant right away blame the woman in this.

Also what is the amountshe sued for. If She only sued for $150,000 it sounds like she only sued for a year or two salary.

I'm not sure that the law should recognize that some verbal contracts are worth more than others.

I doubt that verbal contracts have any legal/binding values. You have to have a physical signed paper
to have a proof before a judge.

also if this case doesnt get a retrial i reckon loads of women will sue men for proposing then changing their mind and suing for emotional distress, "i couldn't bare going to work because i was so upset, they then fired me for not going to work for 3 weeks, so i'm suing him for him causing me emotional distress and losing my job". People break up all the time and get engaged and break-up, this is a natural thing, you shouldn't be able to sue over such a thing.

I BET you this WILL happen if this case doesnt get a re-trial and overturned.

I doubt that verbal contracts have any legal/binding values. You have to have a physical signed paper
to have a proof before a judge.

I'm not sure that the law should recognize that some verbal contracts are worth more than others.

Nah, I think you can live together before getting married with no problems. Flish and I did and had an agreement as to who gets what. We both know who will get what furniture and money and so on.

I think with the right people it can work out, I just think these two were totally the wrong people.

I don't think engagements should be used as verbal contracts and I don't think under breaking it, there should be penalties like this.

No, in the US, there are many case precedents which say if party A promises some action that party B commits some action in preparation for party A fulfilling their offer, then they can be held liable for withdrawing an offer early.

A common case example cites a boat seller, who offers a price to a prospective buyer to be good for 3 days, the buyer makes a preparation to receive the boat by building a dock, but in the meantime, the seller sales to a higher bidder. This constitutes a breach of offer and can be liable in these circumstances. Of course, interpreting to apply to a engagement for marriage may be a bit of a stretch.

I do hope that it is overturned. It sets a bad precedent for anyone in a relationship.

So what you guys are saying is that a guy can propose to a woman tell her to quit her job and move in with him . and the guy breaks it off and nothing will happen even though she had a high paying job ?

The judge is a moron because now people in the same situation are going to sue thinking they can get revenge on the other person.

He sounds like a user. Good for her on standing up for herself.

The money was not for the cost of the wedding. The money is because he convinced her, under a promise of marriage, to quit her job and move to his state. Without this settlement she would have been screwed.