Jump to content
Posted 29 June 2011 - 14:18
Posted 29 June 2011 - 14:27
Posted 29 June 2011 - 14:30
Posted 29 June 2011 - 15:07
+1 I would much rather have the frames per second high as opposed to the resolution being high.
Negative. 720p, 60fps
Posted 29 June 2011 - 15:19
Posted 29 June 2011 - 15:32
Posted 29 June 2011 - 15:52
Are you kidding? A racing game is exactly where you'd want 60fps!
there's really no need for 60fps in a racing game, though, 30fps or there about will work just as well!
Posted 29 June 2011 - 17:23
with all the detail theyve putting into the cars and stuff, i wonder if theres a mode where you can be a mechanic or something using kinect, like taking pieces off the car
Posted 29 June 2011 - 17:41
well i was thinking like you could have mode thats a cross between that 'Operation' game (http://www.tvscoop.t...ration-game.jpg) , Nintendogs, and Half Life 2's gravity gun, where you get a damaged car and you try to fix it, maybe you or a friend crashed the car in-game... not sure what kind of damage model they have, if this is possible or not
That's a pretty cool idea now that you mention it, but I dunno if that's in. Something to look forward to in the next one if it doesn't make it in 4.
Posted 29 June 2011 - 20:32
Posted 30 June 2011 - 13:05
Posted 30 June 2011 - 13:39
A 96-page book
That book with the special edition looks nice. Does it give an indication of it's size or how many pages?
Posted 30 June 2011 - 13:53
There needs to be a sense of speed. Not from the cars so much but from the scenery. I'd much rather have a quick and fluid scenery, guardrails and even tarmac going by at 720 than less fluid 30fps at 1080.
hey ironman, why? racing games there's no a lot of movement overall, i mean it's quite one-directional and there's very little "twitch" movement.
carmatic - oh no, don't suggest that, Forza is good because it's quite realistic, playing a mechanic with superpowers will just seem to out of place!
Posted 30 June 2011 - 13:56