36 replies to this topic

[Unrealistic]

jakem1, on 09 September 2011 - 21:10, said:

I'm really surprised by all the comments here. My girlfriend and I watched it a few weeks ago and both thought it was one of the most rubbish movies we have ever seen. The characters were two dimensional, the plot was boringly repetitive and implausible (yes I know it's sci-fi ) and the ending was schmaltzy.

Agreed.

[FMH]

I didn't knew you can make a spoiler alert like this, the blackened bars.

How was it done?

^Select text above,

[Ayepecks]

jakem1, on 09 September 2011 - 21:10, said:

I'm really surprised by all the comments here. My girlfriend and I watched it a few weeks ago and both thought it was one of the most rubbish movies we have ever seen. The characters were two dimensional, the plot was boringly repetitive and implausible (yes I know it's sci-fi ) and the ending was schmaltzy. Groundhog Day and Star Trek did this sort of thing with much more style.

You say the characters are two-dimensional, then you give Groundhog Day and Star Trek as examples of movies with fleshed out characters? Does not compute.

[Lqv2015]

I fell bored with the movie 30 minutes in. It's like something we've all seen before. This coming from someone who loves sci-fi films.

[Hum]

I liked this movie.

It held my interest.

The ending was far-fetched tho.

[Brian Miller]

Shouldn't the movie be called "Machine Code" and not "Source Code"?

[j4c3]

^Yea, I was trying to explain what source code was to my sister half the movie (rather unsuccessfully)

If you want character development and a deep ending you should be reading a novel, not watching a summer movie :lol:

I thought this movie was entertaining and interesting, that's all I really look for in movies.