Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



How to find what is using 98% of all the ram. When everything looks normal


12 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 +warwagon

    Only you can prevent forest fires.

  • 21,706 posts
  • Joined: 30-November 01
  • Location: Iowa

Posted 13 October 2011 - 17:07

How to find what is chugging all of your ram. When everything looks normal





Today I got a call from someone who all of the sudden had a really slow computer. After a bit of troubleshooting it appears as if something was consuming all of the computers 8GB of ram after every boot. In the performance tab the Physical Memory was at 98%. So I checked the Task manager and also used Process explorer. Noting was showing any sort of high memory usage. Also tried a bit more trouble shooting. Nothing worked.

After doing a little research online I was pointed to yet another Mark Russinovich Application called RAMMap

http://technet.micro...ernals/ff700229

Posted Image

This is just a sample shot



After downloading and running it, it showed the same info under processes as everything else did. BUT under the file summery tab, what I saw was some sort of error log file in the appdata\western digital directory, that was 7.5GB in size. once I removed the file the Physical Memory went from 98% down to 15%

This application was a life saver.

So for anyone who runs into a the same situation give this app a go.


#2 +Brando212

    Causer of disasters

  • 5,463 posts
  • Joined: 15-April 10
  • Location: right behind you
  • OS: OSX ML, Windows 7/8 Pro

Posted 13 October 2011 - 17:13

geez, why the hell was there a 7.5gb error log file?!? 0_o

and yeah, you gotta love the sysinternals suite :)

#3 OP +warwagon

    Only you can prevent forest fires.

  • 21,706 posts
  • Joined: 30-November 01
  • Location: Iowa

Posted 13 October 2011 - 17:18

View PostBrando212, on 13 October 2011 - 17:13, said:

geez, why the hell was there a 7.5gb error log file?!? 0_o

and yeah, you gotta love the sysinternals suite :)

Well I think it was an error log file. It was blahblahblahblahbalhError file name.

#4 The_Decryptor

    THE ALPHA CEPH!

  • 18,352 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 02
  • Location: Sol System
  • OS: WinLin X 10.9 Ill-tempered Badger

Posted 14 October 2011 - 06:11

And what was causing the 7.5GB log file? That'd be something to investigate.

#5 OP +warwagon

    Only you can prevent forest fires.

  • 21,706 posts
  • Joined: 30-November 01
  • Location: Iowa

Posted 14 October 2011 - 06:45

Well I want to wait for that file to be created again but in a smaller size. So I can explore it.

#6 Shaun

    Perfidious

  • 4,985 posts
  • Joined: 09-November 04
  • Location: Northants, England
  • OS: Work: Windows 8/Ubuntu Home: Ubuntu

Posted 14 October 2011 - 08:09

Isn't that bad practice? I wouldn't like to do it that way.

#7 ThePitt

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,808 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 06
  • Location: Hell

Posted 14 October 2011 - 20:49

first, why you didnt take a picture where it shows was using 7.5GB
and second how come that log file was loaded into the memory?

edit
lol?

Posted Image Posted Image

#8 Mark

    (: ollǝɥ

  • 3,467 posts
  • Joined: 22-October 04
  • Location: Derbyshire, UK

Posted 14 October 2011 - 21:14

Could it be that RamMap also shows the amount of cached memory being used as well as active memory?

#9 xendrome

    In God We Trust; All Others We Monitor

  • 5,888 posts
  • Joined: 05-December 01
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro x64

Posted 14 October 2011 - 21:16

Probably, isn't this by design, are we sure Superfetch wasn't just caching the memory as it is supposed to...

#10 soldier1st

    Software Tester/Tech/Linux Lover

  • 4,971 posts
  • Joined: 21-December 03
  • Location: Linux
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Android

Posted 06 November 2011 - 18:38

A picture of the 7.5GB file in question would of been a good idea, as to help those understand the apps usage better.

#11 MediocreNoob

    Resident Fanatic

  • 561 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Pennsylvania

Posted 26 November 2011 - 23:38

IS there anything like this for previous versions of Windows? On the download page it says it only works on Vista and higher.

#12 Optimash Prime

    Neowinian

  • 6,954 posts
  • Joined: 28-August 01
  • Location: .::UK::.

Posted 01 March 2012 - 09:31

interesting useful to have noted down should this occur :)!

#13 mujjuman

    Resident Fanatic

  • 842 posts
  • Joined: 05-September 05
  • Location: New York

Posted 01 April 2012 - 02:07

Interesting program. But yeah the RAM usage is funny!