cmd vs Powershell  

77 members have voted

  1. 1. Which would you like to see in Windows 8?

    • Powershell default, cmd alternative
    • cmd default, Powershell alternative (Currently in Windows 7)
    • Powershell default, no cmd at all
    • cmd default, no Powershell at all


Recommended Posts

With Powershell now released 4 years ago, I think it has come time to completely replace cmd in Windows 8. AFAIK, it does 99% of the things cmd does and alot more so why not?

So Windows 8: cmd or Powershell?

I pick Powershell default, no cmd at all. If someone trys to call cmd, it automatically starts Powershell (cmd being a new alias for Powershell) and/or (again cmd being a alias for Powershell) it again automatically starts Powershell but, since it has been called thru a cmd alias, it starts out in a "cmd compatibility mode"

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1035585-windows-8-cmd-or-powershell/
Share on other sites

CMD is there just for the old folks like me that were used to DOS. :/

Powershell is the exact same thing. Any normal and logic command that you use in CMD and/or DOS, is avaliable in Powershell. If it isnt, there is problably something better and more powerful that replaces it (but AFAIK, every command is avaliable)

Powershell looked pretty god-damn awful when I last launched it on a small screen resolution, I'll stick with cmd and if people try to remove it from working, I'll just get cmd.exe and replace the replaced cmd.exe and powershell.exe with the proper cmd.exe

  • Like 1

Powershell is the exact same thing. Any normal and logic command that you use in CMD and/or DOS, is avaliable in Powershell. If it isnt, there is problably something better and more powerful that replaces it (but AFAIK, every command is avaliable)

I know that and I agree with you, Cmd should be removed, Microsoft only left it in Windows 7 for the old time users that won't advance themselves with the new technology.

I just assumed Powershell was a just a more powerful shell extension of CMD, and not a successor. If it runs everything CMD did, then what's the purpose of keeping CMD? Just for familiarity for those who continue to make heavy use of cli?

Maybe should have posted this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_PowerShell

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_Prompt

It depends. I won't use Powershell to just check connectivity in my network, cmd is much faster to do it, windows + r -> cmd and voi la. IMO Powershell is designed for System Administration and scripting.

windows + r -> powershell

or you can set a alias for powershell for example p and type

windows + r -> p

And there you go: Its faster than cmd.

Powershell looked pretty god-damn awful when I last launched it on a small screen resolution, I'll stick with cmd and if people try to remove it from working, I'll just get cmd.exe and replace the replaced cmd.exe and powershell.exe with the proper cmd.exe

When was the last time you used it? We are currently at 2.0 and 3.0 is in preview (might be included in the Windows 8 dev release, not sure)

When was the last time you used it? We are currently at 2.0 and 3.0 is in preview (might be included in the Windows 8 dev release, not sure)

The version included with some addon to XP from back in the day.

But I still don't see why you're anal on trying to get rid of cmd?

McDonalds uses thin clients with DOS, do you think instead they should scrap the thin client idea, get new workstations with core i5s, guis, windows 7 and a load of rubbish that isn't needed, just because they could?

CMD is simple, fast, effective and serves a purpose. Powershell is something completely different and serves a different purpose, it's not meant for everyday use by all users.

They'll probably keep CMD around, there are so many companies out there who just won't update software or scripts and still expect their old to work...

That said I sure hope Powershell will come installed with all versions of Windows 8.

CMD is there just for the old folks like me that were used to DOS. :/

All the same commands can be used.

You don't have to use Get-ChildItem, you can use Dir if you like as it's set up as an alias by default, heck if you're used to a unix command line you can use their commands too, in this case ls.

windows + r -> powershell

or you can set a alias for powershell for example p and type

windows + r -> p

And there you go: Its faster than cmd.

Well, the cmd prompt usually load a whole lot quicker than the powershell one.

Powershell really doesn't get the attention it deserves. It really can replace the old command prompt if more developers and users were willing to try it.

But they need to keep cmd for compatibility. Aren't logon scripts still .bat files, many of which won't work without modification in Powershell?

Yes I know that, but I won't invoke powershell just to ping an asset. And this is just ridiculous.

Why invoke cmd just to ping an asset?

And the link you posted to........is that really a reason to use cmd over Powershell? :rolleyes: come on....

CMD is simple, fast, effective and serves a purpose. Powershell is something completely different and serves a different purpose, it's not meant for everyday use by all users.

Powershell, as I have stated, includes everything CMD does and more.

CMD isnt also made for "everyday use by all users". You can do everything in Powershell that you can in CMD. I think people are missing that point...

This is the same arguement about people that stay on Windows XP and dont want to upgrade to Windows 7. The even worse part of this is that Powershell is free....

They'll probably keep CMD around, there are so many companies out there who just won't update software or scripts and still expect their old to work...

Thats why I also made a comment that if something calls cmd, Powershell can be ran in a "cmd compatibility mode" which allows it to run exactly the same as regular cmd. Powershell with backwards compatibility which wouldnt break anything :)

That said I sure hope Powershell will come installed with all versions of Windows 8.

It will :) It comes installed with Windows 7 already

All the same commands can be used.

You don't have to use Get-ChildItem, you can use Dir if you like as it's set up as an alias by default, heck if you're used to a unix command line you can use their commands too, in this case ls.

Exactly. Not only do all CMD commands work, but they have actually made aliases for most unix command lines such as bash. What more can you want?

Well, the cmd prompt usually load a whole lot quicker than the powershell one.

DOS/Windows 3.1/Windows 95/Windows 98/Windows ME (yes I said ME)/Windows 2000/Windows XP/Windows Vista/etc were all faster in a loading sense than Windows 7. Point of yours is?

It seems many people here don't understand what CMD is.

Short explanation: CMD is a console window that provides basic functionality for changing the current directory (cd), showing the files and folders (dir) and a few other things (copy, auto-completion, command history...). The most important thing it does is to enable you to open files, give arguments to executables, and provide input and output for console applications.

What you're doing by calling "robocopy C:\SomeFolder C:\SomeOtherFolder" is launching robocopy.exe using "C:\SomeFolder" and "C:\SomeOtherFolder" as parameters. "tree C:\" just calls tree.com with "C:\" as a parameter. "ping google.com" calls ping.exe with "google.com" as parameter. And so on.

These programs (not commands - check your C:\Windows\System32 folder) can be used exactly the same way in PowerShell, and their output will look exactly the same.

In fact, if Microsoft set the default background color to black in PowerShell and removed the "PS" at the beginning of each line, most people wouldn't notice the difference. You would still be able to use the programs you use now.

I want bash

So install Bash. You can do that.

cmd and Powershell are like kids toys by comparison

Cmd maybe, but don't think you've actually tried PowerShell or you wouldn't be saying that. It's quite powerful. Bash is good yes,but looking over what Bash has built in, nothing really jumps out as being something that others can't do or just doesn't apply.. most of it's goodies come from external programs or scripting languages, most of which are available to other shells.

cmd can't be removed as it would break existing scripts and applications that call cmd.

Though PowerShell has aliases for many cmd built-in commands, the cmdlets for which the aliases are mapped do not support the switches of the cmd commands (e.g., you can't do "dir /w" in PowerShell). Variable syntax is also different (e.g., %windir% in cmd vs $env:windir in PowerShell).

PowerShell is getting ever increasing usage as the underpinning for Windows administration and troubleshooting functionality. While it should see greater exposure, such as adding it to the Ribbon and the context menu ("Open PowerShell here"), cmd should not be removed to elevate PowerShell unless the use cases for cmd are covered by PowerShell. It's not like cmd is the only shell besides PowerShell that currently ships with Windows. Its presence doesn't diminish PowerShell.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Those persons has complete control over the internet right now. They do see everything what we do regardless.
    • Everyone and every country who doesn't support Israel's aggression, terrorism and hypocrisy is their immediate enemy. You can definitely see how many innocent people they are killing almost everyday. In fact they're the actual Neo-Nazi who holds Hitler's ideology.
    • Just pull a 4Chan and ignore the UK gov, or better troll them. It's not like they can enforce the fine across border.
    • It has NEVER been shown that all these overreaching creepy methods of surveillance have ever saved a child or prevented a terrorist attack. Not a single one. It's the kind of people like you who just wave it away as "paranoid conspiracy" that makes big tech and governments this creepy mass data hoarding entities. Not only that, 3/4 of these surveillance ideas undermine the very foundations of safe online communication because they always want to have a backdoor in everything "just in case" they might need it to... checks the notes "save the children". If you put a backdoor into encryption chain there is no encryption chain anymore. You know what encryption keeps safe? Your medical records, your online shopping and credit card during payment, your photos in the cloud, your emails, your passwords, everything. There is ZERO guarantee only the good guys will use it. And if you think police suddenly can't apprehend child abusers because of encryption, Epstein was running his entire sex trafficking ring using GMail which is not even encrypted end to end. Or to make matters even worse, USA has a **** and a good buddy of Epstein as a president. Absolutely NOTHING has been done to address it. Maxwell just got a better "hotel" room as a reward. This clearly shows how they absolutely don't really care about the children but they care about the absolute control over all of us. And you're defending them here. Good grief. On top of constant attempts to insert backdoors into encryption chain, the entire age verification nonsense is again entirely over reaching, creepy, invades everyone's privacy with premise of yet again "protecting the children" instead of demanding device makers to provide simple and powerful tools for PARENTS to control how their children use devices and what they do on them. THIS would be the way, not the stupid age verification for everyone. Imagine if government would be dictating companies how their phones work and not the company's IT department. The parents should be the IT department to their children. And for everyone excusing "they are not knowledgeable enough" buuuuuulsheat. We live in a digital age, if you have children now, you absolutely are well versed in digital everything at least to basic extent. If you're not, how do you even function in these times then? Reality is that parents are just lazy and don't want to deal with this. They want government to raise their kids because they are too busy scrolling stupid Instagram and Tiktok or some bs.
    • You could make the argument that K should not be included, but FC, the fried chicken, is not the framework, it's the product. It's the Paint in Paint.NET. A closer analogy is if KFC included the name of the deep fryer they used. HennyPennyFC.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      221
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!