Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Neowin.net PC Game Giveaways||
|Save 88% off this Cyber Security Developer Course Bundle||
|Website builder just to show what products we sell?||
|Meet IKEA's do-all, be-all table of the future||
|Microsoft brings MKV video playback to Windows Phone 8.1 with Update 2||
Posted 01 February 2012 - 19:13
Posted 01 February 2012 - 19:19
I had a nice little debate on the matter of whether 343 deserves the ability to take the Halo title on its own and thought that I wouldn't mind some others opinions on the matter also. I stand against it because I feel as if 343 had an advantage over other companies so I don't personally see them as a legit video game maker whereas Bungie started from the ground up with this and therefore should own it until it dies. Your ideas please...
Posted 01 February 2012 - 19:22
Posted 01 February 2012 - 20:48
Posted 01 February 2012 - 21:03
Posted 01 February 2012 - 21:25
uuuhh... whaaaaaaaaa ?....
I don't really have opinion on 343. It's hard to form an opinion when they have not released a game yet. There's not much there to base a like/dislike off.
343 is made up of mostly Bungie staff, including the Halo lead Frankie. So, yup, they will continue to be solid. Check out Halo CE Anniversary Edition....the hard work there do is there in leaps and bounds.
Posted 01 February 2012 - 21:52
Posted 01 February 2012 - 21:54
yup, Ensemble's last game aswell.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Halo Wars was developed by Ensemble, not 343, dude.
Posted 01 February 2012 - 22:35
I like how you did point CE Anniversary.
From what I can tell, they didn't do much to the game. They replaced the graphics and redid the sound effects, however it doesn't appear that they edited any of the major coding.
Posted 01 February 2012 - 22:37
I like how you did point CE Anniversary. From what I can tell, they didn't do much to the game. They replaced the graphics and redid the sound effects, however it doesn't appear that they edited any of the major coding. Also, I was super excited about the implementation of the reach engine, then very disappointed that they just launched the multiplayer feature of reach. Last little rant about that game, but that game needed to have its 4 player co-op. If they were trying to make it up to date, they needed to add the 4 player co-op back. This is why I am not too excited about their next game. They didnt take the initiative towards the last game.
Posted 02 February 2012 - 02:44
Posted 02 February 2012 - 05:22