Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
satukoro

os x What is going to happen after OS X 10.9?

108 posts in this topic

Yeah, I know, I'm just pointing out that some lazy developers (you know, the ones least likely to actually do updates) have in the past screwed up with version checking, and it could happen again with 10.10.

From Apple's perspective I don't think that's much of a reason for them to even consider jumping to "v11.0". :)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From Apple's perspective I don't think that's much of a reason for them to even consider jumping to "v11.0". :)

Oh, certainly not, and I didn't mean to imply that it was. In fact, that would bring all kinds of versioning problems of its own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha very well? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OS X.X :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OS X.X :rofl:

OS X.X.X will be one hot OS. ;)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's time for a major OS update and a new name. I agree with those who think that Apple will eventually merge OSX and iOS. If they do, how about Xi?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's time for a major OS update and a new name.

Something new for the sake of having something new.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really see why they wouldn't just call it OS XI.

I mean is OS X really that much of a brand name that they can't move forward? I really don't think it is.

but what do I know :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"OS X" has become Apple's brand name for their desktop operating system. In very much the same way "Windows", "Ubuntu", "Android" or "iOS". For whatever reason some people are still unable to see "OS X" as a name rather than just a version number.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

be nice to see os XI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"OS X" has become Apple's brand name for their desktop operating system. In very much the same way "Windows", "Ubuntu", "Android" or "iOS". For whatever reason some people are still unable to see "OS X" as a name rather than just a version number.

But OS X is a version number... roman numeral 10.

Many people say "OS EX" but it's really "OS TEN"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But OS X is a version number... roman numeral 10.

Many people say "OS EX" but it's really "OS TEN"

I'm fully aware that "X" stands for "10". It started out as purely a version number, in later years it has become Apple brand for their desktop operating system. I'm not entirely sure why some people have such a difficult time coming to terms with that and are almost obsessed with Apple moving on to version 11.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

11 would probably look like this.

Screen%20Shot%202013-05-30%20at%207.29.39%20AM.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll probably just call it "The New OS X 10.0"

Jokes aside, I think "OS X" is now more of a brand name then it's literal (roman) numbering now and they may just as well call it OS X 11.0

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They likely will. It's not just a brand name, it also represents the (then entirely new) code base/platform it's built upon. Think of OS X 10.8 as OS X v8, for example, and it makes more sense that there could easily be OS X 11.0. Not to mention version numbers don't really mean anything anymore, just ask Google Chrome.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they will have 1 os within 3 years for pc / mobile.

Why? do you think they want to travel down the failed Microsoft route?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was immediately reminded of this at the thought of OS X 10.0. :p

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZjqucrnI9w

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they move on to OS XI. The reason: yes, vesion number goes further than .9, but who said that Mac OS can handel a .xx release? A version number gaining another digit can give serious problems and bugs. For example, software could see OS X 10.10 as OS X 10.1, because they don't expect a second digit after the first minor digit. This will turn out in lots of software bugging up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they move on to OS XI. The reason: yes, vesion number goes further than .9, but who said that Mac OS can handel a .xx release? A version number gaining another digit can give serious problems and bugs. For example, software could see OS X 10.10 as OS X 10.1, because they don't expect a second digit after the first minor digit. This will turn out in lots of software bugging up.

OS X Tiger had point releases that were 10 and above. I believe the final release was 10.4.11, and everything was just fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OS X Tiger had point releases that were 10 and above. I believe the final release was 10.4.11, and everything was just fine.

Yes, but there is a huge difference in incrementing from 10.4.1 to 10.4.11 and trying to increment from 10.9 to 10.10. It simply doesn't work that way.

I mean is OS X really that much of a brand name that they can't move forward? I really don't think it is.

>

"OS X" has become Apple's brand name for their desktop operating system. In very much the same way "Windows", "Ubuntu", "Android" or "iOS". For whatever reason some people are still unable to see "OS X" as a name rather than just a version number.

Exactly. I remember hearing some time back that although Apple's computers are still called "Macs," the operating system is no longer called Macintosh. That being said, OSX has become the name of the operating system, I would imagine. As such, to me at least, the X has lost it ten-ness and has simply become a meaningless part of an acronym.

I think they'll go with either OSX 11 (incrementing from 10.9 to 11.0) or try to drop the X and go with OS11.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it hard to believe that software would crash because of "10.10." This isn't the Y2k problem... There could potentially be some minor compatibility issues, ones that could probably be fixed very fast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As mentioned before OSX is a brand name, with connections to uniX and nextX, they will simply move to 10.10, with more of a focus on the naming of the version after a cat or other animal, since leopard and even with some beginings in Tiger apple have moved more and more to refer to the versions by their cat code names rather than the version number.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they move on to OS XI. The reason: yes, vesion number goes further than .9, but who said that Mac OS can handel a .xx release? A version number gaining another digit can give serious problems and bugs. For example, software could see OS X 10.10 as OS X 10.1, because they don't expect a second digit after the first minor digit. This will turn out in lots of software bugging up.

I said it once and I'll say it again: Thank god for software updates. Also, OS X ? Windows. Certain problems and limitations that exist on Microsoft's platform don't necessarily have to exist on Apple's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll take a page from Microsoft and call it OS One! Or one up (down?) them and call it OS Zero. ;) OSZ! (that'll please the people who refer to OS X as "Oh Ess Ex" rather than the roman numeral it is "Oh Ess Ten" like Apple always does) You've heard it here first folks! *not at all serious in case you can't tell* The serious part however is the way Apple always refers to the OS and it's never EX. Like for example, they say the latest as OS TEN Mavericks. The only people who refer to it as EX that are a certain segment of the audience.

Oh and I'd just love to see how people would try to phonetically pronounce XI. Exxi? Oh Ess Exxi.. how sexxi! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.