Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



Tom Cruise to 'fly' last manned fighter jet in 'Top Gun 2'


23 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 Scorbing

    Halo Master

  • 6,503 posts
  • Joined: 02-December 01
  • Location: Florida
  • OS: Win 7 Pro, OSX 10.8, Ubuntu 12.10
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 2

Posted 27 May 2012 - 02:52

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn...er-jet-top-gun/


Hollywood is going back to "Top Gun" school with its upcoming sequel to the 1986 film, but hotshot pilot Maverick won't be flying any killer robot drones. Instead, Tom Cruise is set to return in the starring role as a test pilot for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter — a plane that could well be the last manned fighter aircraft made in the West.
The news slipped from the lips of the Lockheed Martin's F-35 program manager during a National Aeronautics Association luncheon last week, according to FlightGlobal's military aviation blog The DEW Line. If that plot decision shapes the final "Top Gun 2" film, the choice to feature a manned aircraft stands out in a time when U.S. military drone pilots can see far more action in a week than most fighter pilots see in months.


While Tom Cruise may jump into the seat of an F-35, entire squadrons of real U.S. military fighter pilots have already switched over from manned aircraft to remote-controlled drones such as the Predator or Reaper. Many of the best test pilots from the U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School now graduate having extensive flight time with drones.

Maverick's own U.S. Navy has begun testing the sleek, futuristic X-47B drone that could take off from aircraft carriers as soon as 2013. That drone could end up flying alongside manned fighter jets such as the F-18 Super Hornet — the F-14 Tomcats flown by Maverick and Iceman in the original "Top Gun" retired from operational service in 2006.

The "Top Gun 2" choice of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter may also prove controversial based on the aircraft's own merits — both outside experts and government reports have cited years of delays and technical issues leading to an estimated lifetime cost of $1 trillion. When Foreign Policy recently asked 76 defense experts to list three programs that they would cut immediately from the U.S. defense budget, the most popular No. 1 choice was the F-35.

"We have had only one fighter jet shot down by an enemy fighter jet in the last 40 years," said one expert interviewed by Foreign Policy. "We simply don't need to spend over a trillion on a new fighter at this point."

Even military supporters who insist that the F-35 JSF is a necessary sixth-generation aircraft for the U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps admit that it may prove the last manned fighter aircraft for the U.S. and its allies. They include past Pentagon leaders such as Mike Mullen, a retired U.S. Navy admiral and the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

"There are those that see JSF as the last manned fighter — or fighter-bomber, or jet," Mullen said during a Senate Armed Service Committee testimony in 2009. "I'm one that's inclined to believe that."

"Top Gun 2" could still end up taking moviegoers on a wild cinematic ride when it comes out, and perhaps even showcase the challenges faced by human pilots in the era of robotic drones. But if the film merely echoes the original "Top Gun" parade of aerial combat and fighter jock culture, it risks losing itself in a Hollywood fantasy far removed from the futuristic reality of modern warfare.

Edited by John S., 27 May 2012 - 13:20.
removed the ants



#2 PmRd

    Neowinian

  • 1,142 posts
  • Joined: 30-December 01
  • Location: Québec City
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: Windows Phone (HD7)

Posted 27 May 2012 - 02:56

Could you make the font smaller please? :p

#3 Farstrider

    The Clash

  • 6,311 posts
  • Joined: 16-March 03
  • Location: Somerset West, Cape Town, SA
  • OS: Arch Linux

Posted 27 May 2012 - 02:58

Have to admit, even with my spectacles on, I can barely read it!

#4 Osiris

    Neowinian God!

  • 10,705 posts
  • Joined: 31-October 01
  • Location: Australia

Posted 27 May 2012 - 03:00

Time to crack out the browsers zoom button I see...

haha anyway this is has to be for the lulz hollywood.

edit: go go gadget magnifying glass!

#5 kev64

    Jedi Master

  • 1,629 posts
  • Joined: 09-October 02
  • Location: Plymouth, UK

Posted 27 May 2012 - 03:26

That text is as small as Tom Cruise :laugh:

I've still not seen the first Top Gun :o


#6 sava700

    Resident Elite

  • 1,139 posts
  • Joined: 17-February 08

Posted 27 May 2012 - 04:23

View Postkev64, on 27 May 2012 - 03:26, said:

That text is as small as Tom Cruise :laugh:

I've still not seen the first Top Gun :o


da hell?? how could anyone alive not seen the original Top Gun?!?? you must be 15years old.

#7 Xerino

    The Mouth

  • 2,036 posts
  • Joined: 09-January 04
  • Location: California
  • OS: Windows 7

Posted 27 May 2012 - 04:26

View Postkev64, on 27 May 2012 - 03:26, said:

That text is as small as Tom Cruise :laugh:

I've still not seen the first Top Gun :o


You didnt miss much.... its a love story... with jets....

#8 Razorwing

    藤原 拓海

  • 13,812 posts
  • Joined: 14-March 03
  • Location: Markham,Ontario
  • OS: Windows 8 / OSX Mountain Lion
  • Phone: HTC One

Posted 27 May 2012 - 05:02

View PostXerino, on 27 May 2012 - 04:26, said:

You didnt miss much.... its a love story... with jets....

and a kick ass theme song.

#9 Konstanov

    Neowinian UNSTOPPABLE

  • 5,594 posts
  • Joined: 16-December 04
  • Location: Dallas|Volgograd

Posted 27 May 2012 - 16:01

Why not fly something far more badass like a Raptor?

#10 Solid Knight

    Neowinian UNSTOPPABLE

  • 5,092 posts
  • Joined: 22-February 08
  • Location: New Orleans, LA

Posted 27 May 2012 - 16:09

Switch over to an all drone fleet and you'll see the rise of defense grids designed to jam communication to them.

#11 OP Scorbing

    Halo Master

  • 6,503 posts
  • Joined: 02-December 01
  • Location: Florida
  • OS: Win 7 Pro, OSX 10.8, Ubuntu 12.10
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 2

Posted 27 May 2012 - 16:18

View PostFarstrider, on 27 May 2012 - 02:58, said:

Have to admit, even with my spectacles on, I can barely read it!

You do have a Zoom button on your browser, correct? :rofl:

#12 HawkMan

    Badass Viking

  • 16,634 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway

Posted 27 May 2012 - 16:24

View PostRazorwing, on 27 May 2012 - 05:02, said:

and a kick ass theme song.
danger zone is better than the actual theme song.

#13 GP007

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 13,703 posts
  • Joined: 04-February 07
  • Location: Greece
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro 64bit
  • Phone: HTC Windows Phone 8X

Posted 27 May 2012 - 17:54

View PostKonstanov, on 27 May 2012 - 16:01, said:

Why not fly something far more badass like a Raptor?

Because the F22 is used by the Air Force afaik, the F35B is for the Navy and this being Top Gun, Tom is a Navy fighter pilot.

#14 arachnoid

    > Press Here <

  • 732 posts
  • Joined: 03-November 11

Posted 27 May 2012 - 18:45

"We have had only one fighter jet shot down by an enemy fighter jet in the last 40 years," said one expert interviewed by Foreign Policy. "We simply don't need to spend over a trillion on a new fighter at this point."


Simply because of money continually spent on innovation and imporovements,secondly its a loaded statement in that it only mentions aircraft shot down by aircraft not ground or ship based weapons.You cant rely on outdated tech to live beyond its viable lifespan on the changing battlefield.
Lets take tanks as an example they cost billions to make yet a simple cheap Russian made shoulder launched rocket can take one out in a flash unless you innovate the onboard protective devices like the new Israeli Trophy protective system.

http://www.youtube.c...d&v=62jzAupr044

#15 +SOOPRcow

    Neowinian

  • 1,420 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 02

Posted 27 May 2012 - 18:55

Guys... you're not looking at the bigger problem with all this.... they're making a Top Gun 2... what the hell.