Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|MS has gone clinically insane||
|Interesting Issue with Hyper-V Windows 8.1||
|Need help with a Mac issue||
|Gunman killed after shooting 2 officers at Minnesota city hall||
Posted 19 June 2012 - 18:15
Posted 19 June 2012 - 18:18
Posted 19 June 2012 - 18:29
Posted 20 June 2012 - 09:49
Yea they do that, then folks who use them would then complain of how slow they are. So the better question is why would they want to?
Posted 21 June 2012 - 07:18
Considering the market for the pro models (in my opinion) is mostly made of business, I'd think the iGPU would be more than enough.
They'd want to use a AMD APU if they wanted better graphics performance. Lets face it, while the i5 is the better CPU, Intels HD4000 IGP isn't anywhere as close to what AMD puts into it's new APUs. But again, the Surface Pro could be targeting those who want to consume media AND do some work, those people aren't going to be playing something like Crysis on these devices so having something better than the Intel HD4000 IGP could be for nothing. As long as the devices can do 1080p video playback I think everyones happy.
Posted 21 June 2012 - 07:37
Posted 21 June 2012 - 07:46
Posted 21 June 2012 - 08:45
so you tried to run WoW on a computer that was already 10 years old when WoW launched ?
that's theonly way to explain tha, as an AMD will run WoW and other games just as well as an intel comouter of the same or higher value.
their cpu's are eaker than the igh end intel's but then, no ames today need a very powerul cpu.
Posted 21 June 2012 - 11:49
Are you having some keyboard problems, there?
I can't see them using AMD, their performance is so poor.
Posted 21 June 2012 - 12:35
Posted 21 June 2012 - 15:07
Posted 21 June 2012 - 19:05
Posted 21 June 2012 - 19:12