Black jellybean costs firm $10,000


Recommended Posts

A cinema worker dismissed after taking a single jellybean from the candy bar has won more than $10,000 from her employer.

Anne Kemp was working as a supervisor at Hawera Cinema when another employee told the manager, Kirsty Bourke, she had seen Mrs Kemp take one black jellybean from a jar to eat and warned her that was theft.

The employee claimed Mrs Kemp had previously taken confectionery and eaten icecream without paying for it.

Mrs Kemp denied that, telling the Employment Relations Authority that employees were generally allowed a couple of drinks and popcorn, but nothing else, unless they paid for it.

On January 10, 2011 Mrs Kemp was sent home by Mrs Bourke on full pay after Mrs Bourke and the trust which owns the cinema, Hawera Cinema 2 Trust Inc, decided her alleged behaviour was unacceptable.

A private "mediation meeting" was held a week later. An acquaintance of Mrs Bourke, a friend of the employee who reported Mrs Kemp, acted as mediator. Mrs Kemp was dismissed.

Authority member Paul Stapp said that was not what a fair and reasonable employer would have done.

He said Mrs Kemp's dismissal was unjustified and said she should be compensated.

The authority ordered the cinema trust to pay Mrs Kemp $6572.28 in lost wages and $4000 for humiliation and injury to feelings. :huh:

source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can sympathize with this, if you are a licorice eater, black jellybeans are VERY hard to resist. Obviously the judge likes licorice too so he could see it this way. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I am willing to bet that the employee was no good and they were looking to get rid of her. This kind of interference in private sector relations should not be tolerated at all. The only thing I believe should be "regulated" if you will is that I would like the law to veiw the Employee handbook as a legal standing contract. that way the employer getrs to make up the rules, but cant change them on a whim either or break them in handling an employee case himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cherry jelly bellyscherry jelly bellyscherry jelly bellyscherry jelly bellyscherry jelly bellyscherry jelly bellyscherry jelly bellyscherry jelly bellyscherry jelly bellyscherry jelly bellys

Easy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I am willing to bet that the employee was no good and they were looking to get rid of her. This kind of interference in private sector relations should not be tolerated at all. The only thing I believe should be "regulated" if you will is that I would like the law to veiw the Employee handbook as a legal standing contract. that way the employer getrs to make up the rules, but cant change them on a whim either or break them in handling an employee case himself.

Yeah but using the friend of the employee that reported the accused as a mediator is pretty unprofessional..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.