Jump to content


Samsung Wins U.K. Apple Ruling Over ‘Not as Cool’ Galaxy Tab

patent wars samsung apple ipad galaxy tab

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 +Frank B.

Frank B.

    Member N° 1,302

  • 25,438 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 01
  • Location: Frankfurt, DE
  • OS: OS X 10.10
  • Phone: Galaxy S6

Posted 09 July 2012 - 16:41

Samsung Wins U.K. Apple Ruling Over ‘Not as Cool’ Galaxy Tab

Samsung Electronics Co. (005930) won a legal ruling after a U.K. judge said its Galaxy tablets aren’t “cool” enough to be confused with Apple Inc. (AAPL)’s iPad.

The design for three Galaxy tablets doesn’t infringe Apple’s registered design, Judge Colin Birss said today in London in a court fight between the world’s two biggest makers of smartphones. Consumers aren’t likely to get the tablet computers mixed up, he said.

The Galaxy tablets “do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design,” Birss said. “They are not as cool.”

Apple is fighting patent lawsuits around the globe against rivals including HTC Corp. (2498) and Samsung as it competes for dominance of the smartphone and tablet computer markets. The firms have accused each other of copying designs and technology in mobile devices. Together, Samsung and Apple make more than half of the smartphones sold worldwide, according to IDC, a Framingham, Massachusetts-based market researcher.

Samsung said the judgment affirms its position that the Galaxy doesn’t infringe Apple’s design rights.

“Should Apple continue to make excessive legal claims in other countries based on such generic designs, innovation in the industry could be harmed and consumer choice unduly limited,” Suwon, South Korea-based Samsung said in an e-mailed statement.

Unusual Details

“It’s no coincidence that Samsung’s latest products look a lot like the iPhone and iPad,” Apple spokesman Alan Hely said in an e-mailed statement that didn’t specifically address the ruling. “This kind of blatant copying is wrong and, as we’ve said many times before, we need to protect Apple’s intellectual property.”

Samsung asked the U.K. court to rule that its Galaxy tablets weren’t too similar to products created by the late Apple co-founder Steve Jobs and design chief Jonathan Ive, according to today’s judgment. Apple filed a counter-claim.

The judge found that Samsung’s products were distinctive because they were thinner and had “unusual details” on the back. He gave Apple 21 days to appeal.

Apple, based in Cupertino, California, has sought court orders in the U.S., Germany, the Netherlands and elsewhere seeking to block Samsung from selling its tablets.

Samsung has been ordered to stop selling its Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the U.S. until a patent-infringement trial can be held. An order that it also stop selling its newest Galaxy Nexus smartphone was temporarily put on hold last week while an appeals court considers Samsung’s petition to have the ban lifted.

The case is Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Anr v. Apple Inc., High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, HC11C03050.

Source: Bloomberg

#2 Javik



  • 6,549 posts
  • Joined: 21-May 12

Posted 09 July 2012 - 16:46

That sounds like an odd tagline on which to win an argument :laugh:

#3 .Neo


    Generic User

  • 17,839 posts
  • Joined: 14-September 05
  • OS: OS X / Windows
  • Phone: iPhone 5s

Posted 09 July 2012 - 18:59

That's one bittersweet ruling for both companies.

#4 Charisma



  • 4,594 posts
  • Joined: 02-May 10
  • Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha

Posted 09 July 2012 - 19:10

LOL, I'm pretty sure "coolness" is a matter of opinion. Just glad this judge's opinion was enough to sway this lawsuit in the right direction, even if Samsung is left going "wtf?"

#5 Lirodon



  • 164 posts
  • Joined: 09-July 12

Posted 09 July 2012 - 19:12

"Not cool" probably means "Apple won't mind, because everyone else's is inferior anyway. Go Apple!"

#6 techbeck


    It's not that I am lazy, it's that I just don't care

  • 20,799 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 05

Posted 10 July 2012 - 00:11

The judge found that Samsung’s products were distinctive because they were thinner and had “unusual details” on the back.

Finally a sensible judge.