Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



Judge in Samsung vs Apple patent suit proceedings 'ridiculous'


4 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 +techbeck

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 12,360 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 05

Posted 23 July 2012 - 17:55

Quote

A trial over whether Apple infringed on Samsung 3G patents has begun in Sydney, the latest step in a global fight between the two companies. But Bloomberg reports that Federal Court Justice Annabelle Bennett, who is overseeing the trial, has called it "ridiculous," asking the lawyers "Why on earth are these proceedings going ahead?" Bennett then questioned why she should not send Apple and Samsung into mediation, saying she would expect an answer by the end of the week. The two companies have previously been ordered to mediation in the US, but the session produced "no clear agreement."

Samsung filed its Australian charges in response to a similar suit by Apple, which was later expanded to cover 22 patents. Samsung claims that Apple "refused to engage in negotiations" over licensing its 3G patents, but Apple lawyer Stephen Burley disputes this, insisting that Apple was willing to pay and Samsung refused. The trial began today and is set to run through the end of the week, with further sessions planned through October.

http://www.theverge....3g-trial-begins


#2 pwgarner

    Neowinian²

  • 160 posts
  • Joined: 29-January 12
  • Location: NC

Posted 23 July 2012 - 19:02

So Samsung will accept payment for screens and other parts but not for essential patents. Maybe the price was unfair maybe not but to say Apple wanted to pay and Samsung then refused to accept payment seems crazy. Maybe it is just me.

#3 OP +techbeck

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 12,360 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 05

Posted 23 July 2012 - 19:13

View Postpwgarner, on 23 July 2012 - 19:02, said:

So Samsung will accept payment for screens and other parts but not for essential patents. Maybe the price was unfair maybe not but to say Apple wanted to pay and Samsung then refused to accept payment seems crazy. Maybe it is just me.

Its a he said/he said thing here. There is no proof that Samsung turned down the payment as well as there is no proof that Apple refused to negotiate. This will come out IF it makes it to court. Right now, the judge is ready to go to mediation to resolve this if Apple or Samsung cannot justify their case.

#4 vetGrowled

    Resident Rockstar

  • 36,016 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 24 July 2012 - 00:47

The whole thing is ridiculous, and a waste of time and money.

#5 Javik

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,298 posts
  • Joined: 21-May 12

Posted 24 July 2012 - 00:51

Given how badly Apple have been trying to squeeze Samsung, if I were in their shoes I wouldn't want to license my patents to Apple either.