Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



Stay-at-Home Dad Wins Right to Front Yard Vegetable Garden


41 replies to this topic * * * - - 2 votes

#1 Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 54,309 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 30 July 2012 - 16:57

Karl Tricamo has gardened off and on since he was a child. He says he's had about six or seven seasons in which to hone his "green thumb." Earlier this year, his concerns about GMOs and the use of pesticides and herbicides in industrial farming prompted the stay-at-home dad to convert his front lawn into a vegetable garden. His plant list included 55 heirloom varieties of plants like, tomatoes, peppers, squash, eggplant and various ornamental plants.

Before starting his garden he reviewed the city’s ordinances to ensure that he was following all the necessary rules in regards to front yard landscaping.

Ferguson, Missouri, city officials were not as impressed with Karl’s due diligence and his desire to feed his family with food he sustainably grew in his front yard.

His landlord (his fiancee's brother) was cited for “Failure to meet the minimum standards of the City of Ferguson exterior appearance code" when Tricamo tore up the front lawn and converted it into an heirloom veggie garden.

"He is in support of the garden, which is solely my endeavor," say Tricamo, 29. "But he was the one facing any legal repercussions such as fines, court, etc. I just faced losing the garden itself."

It's not clear if his garden was targeted because of any complaints, but at least one neighbor was on Team Karl. "My immediate neighbor even let me put two tomato bushes in her front yard planter box, as a show of solidarity," Tricamo informs me.

He says that last year he had a front yard 15' x 20' vegetable garden just a few blocks from the current garden that has caused a stir. But imagines that the garden wasn't detected by city officials because it was partially obscured from the street by a hedge.

On his blog, Vegetable Yarden, Tricamo documented his experience once he received the citation for his current garden. Along with listing ordinances that supported his case, he documents what seems like intimidation by code enforcement that routinely drove by or sat in front of his house as he disregarded their orders to remove the vegetable garden and plant grass.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that last week Tricamo’s months long feud with the city ended when the city’s Board of Adjustment voted 4-1 to throw out the citation against his garden. Tricamo and his future brother-in-lawn were represented by Dave Roland, a lawyer with the Libertarian group Freedom Center of Missouri.

The lone vote against Tricamo’s garden came from board chairman, Joe Schroeder, who doesn’t seem too happy about the law being in Tricamo’s favor.

"The board felt that, technically, he had the law in his favor," Schroeder told the Post-Dispatch. "But I think that all of us on the board agreed that the garden is an eyesore. It goes against common sense, really, to put a garden in the front yard instead of the back."

Posted Image

more


#2 Charisma

    e-1337-ist

  • 3,757 posts
  • Joined: 02-May 10
  • Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:01

How ridiculous that this is against some law. FFS, I'll have whatever plants I want in my front yard. How out of touch with nature do you have to be to consider than an "eyesore"? People just... I just... :no:

#3 jakem1

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 5,434 posts
  • Joined: 17-November 06

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:02

It looks quite nice in the photo. I can't see why anyone would object to that.

By the way, why is it significant that he's a stay at home dad?

#4 majortom1981

    The crazy one

  • 4,984 posts
  • Joined: 30-November 01

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:06

How does he stop people from taking tomatos from the plants ? Since they are in hisa front yard?

#5 deactivated_

    Deactivated_

  • 888 posts
  • Joined: 05-August 08

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:08

Front yards do generally have much more sun than back yards. I see the laws on such things being challenged more and more as food prices go up and up. Not many remember the days of the 'Victory Gardens', so it's a similar concept, just no need for war involved. Other than the war on inflated food prices and low income, of course.

#6 Xilo

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,982 posts
  • Joined: 28-May 04
  • Location: Austin, TX

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:09

View Postmajortom1981, on 30 July 2012 - 17:06, said:

How does he stop people from taking tomatos from the plants ? Since they are in hisa front yard?
Because he's a stay at home dad. :laugh:

#7 deactivated_

    Deactivated_

  • 888 posts
  • Joined: 05-August 08

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:09

View Postmajortom1981, on 30 July 2012 - 17:06, said:

How does he stop people from taking tomatos from the plants ? Since they are in hisa front yard?

Not all on the planet have a total lack of morals, thankfully.

#8 +techbeck

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 12,329 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 05

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:14

His veggie garden lawn looks better than most normal lawns I see. As long as he keeps it looking like the picture, who cares. Its different and kinda cool looking.

#9 qdave

    Neowinian Super Cool

  • 16,122 posts
  • Joined: 02-October 02
  • Location: Vilnius, Lithuania | Toronto,On

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:16

Quote

It goes against common sense, really, to put a garden in the front yard instead of the back.

Obviously some people are lacking common sense :D

#10 QUAD2500K

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,590 posts
  • Joined: 19-November 03

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:23

atleast he is taking care of his yard, unlike some people who have knee high grass

#11 perochan

    ♫ d(-_-)b ♫

  • 4,333 posts
  • Joined: 06-October 02
  • Location: California

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:26

View Postqdave, on 30 July 2012 - 17:16, said:

Obviously some people are lacking common sense :D

it is better to put vegetation in the back cuz in the front cars/people/pets go by and it will contaminate the food....

#12 OP Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 54,309 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:27

It only looks bad when nothing is growing there. :laugh:

I would be worried about vandalism and theft, having the garden in the front.

#13 Skwerl

    Neowinian Ancient

  • 1,374 posts
  • Joined: 02-August 01
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: HD7

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:49

That doesn't look nearly as bad as it surely does now. I've grown tomatoes for years, and they tend to be unruly and aren't too attractive as the summer draws on. The garden in the photo is certainly not an eyesore, but it's still not something that's traditionally appropriate for a front yard.

#14 Javik

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,261 posts
  • Joined: 21-May 12

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:52

View PostCharisma, on 30 July 2012 - 17:01, said:

How ridiculous that this is against some law. FFS, I'll have whatever plants I want in my front yard. How out of touch with nature do you have to be to consider than an "eyesore"? People just... I just... :no:

Quite so, it doesn't hurt anybody.

#15 Orange Battery

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,769 posts
  • Joined: 09-March 04
  • Location: London

Posted 30 July 2012 - 17:58

i wish my neighbours front gardens looked like that.