Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

win8 You can


55 posts in this topic

Posted

You can

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

...Why would Windows Defender protect Facebook and an ads site from being blocked?

I smell a payoff here...

9 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

in MSE (and i imagine windows defender) you can exclude files. just excludes the hosts file and it should not change it back

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I smell a payoff here...

A lot of anti-malware suites will prevent changes to the hosts file.. common way to hijack sites and such. Exclude or use a different suite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So really a non-issue.

Moving swiftly on...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

in MSE (and i imagine windows defender) you can exclude files. just excludes the hosts file and it should not change it back

^this.

If you modifiy the host file manually, it will trigger a warning (since it's a good way to do man in the middle attacks for example) but you can tell MSE/Windows defender to allow the change, then it won't revert it back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

A lot of anti-malware suites will prevent changes to the hosts file.. common way to hijack sites and such. Exclude or use a different suite.

Yep... can understand their reasons for doing it. Bit annoying though if you do alter your hosts file when doing testing and so forth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I will take note to turn off Windows Defender when updating my hosts file with a malware stopping one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

A lot of anti-malware suites will prevent changes to the hosts file.. common way to hijack sites and such. Exclude or use a different suite.

It's the fact that it only blocks some sites, that seems very fishy. If you are going to protect the hosts file in this manner, why not protect it entirely?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It's that fact that it only blocks some sites, that seems very fishy. If you are going to protect the hosts file in this manner, why not protect it entirely?

Look how big facebook.com is. If some trojan decided to link it to a different IP within the hosts file, thats why it only does some domain names. Malware authors dont care about picsofmygranny.com with its 5 users

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

or just install some parental lock software. Im assuming you want to block facebook so your kids cant go on cause they are too young and not cause you have no self control can't just not go there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It's that fact that it only blocks some sites, that seems very fishy. If you are going to protect the hosts file in this manner, why not protect it entirely?

this

i knew that anti-malware solutions block access to the host file or at least that access triggers a warning; the new thing here is that Windows Defender only blocks some sites, witch is odd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Facebook is fine to not add. I see no ill will in that, and it's a common trap for people to input their passwords on Facebook phishing sites.

I am a bit concerned about doubleclick. Is that the common ad platform for Windows 8?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I am a bit concerned about doubleclick. Is that the common ad platform for Windows 8?

It's one of the biggest ad networks on the internet. Someone being able to redirect all that traffic for their own purposes by modifying someone elses hosts files is quite the issue - considering how many websites have ads served by doubleclick.

By the way, doubleclick is run by Google - Microsoft tends to use their own advertising platform.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It's that fact that it only blocks some sites, that seems very fishy

Not really. Lets wait an see which sites block and which don't. I'm guessing it's borne out of their diagnosis of which sites are most commonly attacked in such a manner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It's one of the biggest ad networks on the internet. Someone being able to redirect all that traffic for their own purposes by modifying someone elses hosts files is quite the issue - considering how many websites have ads served by doubleclick.

By the way, doubleclick is run by Google - Microsoft tends to use their own advertising platform.

Ah, that makes sense.

I would be curious to know if other high-profile sites are prevented from being redirected as well. I'd expect at least the Alexa top 50. Right now, we can justify each of those sites individually, but if it's ONLY those two sites, it's worth questioning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It's the fact that it only blocks some sites, that seems very fishy. If you are going to protect the hosts file in this manner, why not protect it entirely?

I am glad it doesn't protect the whole file. I can still use it for my own work (which uses internal domains).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Has anyone tried adding the hosts file to the exclude list to see if it resolves this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Has anyone tried adding the hosts file to the exclude list to see if it resolves this?

It works according to another post here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It works according to another post here

Guess I missed it, thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

hosts file is not meant for website blocking or anything other kind of blocking. when are people going to learn this.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

hosts file is not meant for website blocking or anything other kind of blocking. when are people going to learn this.

When there is another effective way to block sites :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I can see a very legit use for only doing certain sites. Since DoubleClick is one of the biggest ad networks out there, redirecting it to a mailious IP address using the HOSTS file is a good way to get malware installed. Same with Facebook, and if something like that ever did happen to Mr Average J. User, he wouldn't even begin to know how to fix it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Can't believe I'm defending Windows 8, but here goes: I did my own testing here with XP, Vista and 7. It has nothing to do with the OS you are using, and everything to do with MSE. End of story, try it for yourself. MSE will remove certain things from your HOSTS file even if it's Read Only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Can't believe I'm defending Windows 8, but here goes: I did my own testing here with XP, Vista and 7. It has nothing to do with the OS you are using, and everything to do with MSE. End of story, try it for yourself. MSE will remove certain things from your HOSTS file even if it's Read Only.

while true, MSE is install by default on windows 8. By doing this i count MSE on windows 8 as part of the windows 8 OS. Im very interested in this, but am not going dog MS and Windows 8 till more is known.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.