Jump to content



Photo

Window 8 RTM defragger

win8

  • Please log in to reply
70 replies to this topic

#61 Roberto Guedes

Roberto Guedes

    Neowinian

  • Joined: 15-July 10

Posted 08 September 2012 - 17:51

TuneUP ? Whoa are you a time traveler from the 2000's ? :D


Yeah, after I posted, I did some research about this software. I just need to say that it was uninstalled shortly after.


#62 Master Shake

Master Shake

    alll riiiight

  • Joined: 04-April 05

Posted 08 September 2012 - 18:37

UGHH enough fighting! I haven't had any "problems" with win8's defrag, but I would use a 3rd party one if I knew it was actually better than it is now

#63 OP chillipig

chillipig

    Neowinian

  • Joined: 30-July 08

Posted 09 September 2012 - 00:41

Im amazed that some of you dont use software because its CEO (the guy basically doesnt write any program code o algorithm) has relgious views different than yours.

Man, this world is ****ed up....


If you found yourself in a restaurant about to be served by people who were having a sincere discussion on how the food they were making had been prepared especially for the immediate Alien visitation, would you eat it?

#64 ajua

ajua

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 12-February 07
  • Location: Mexico

Posted 09 September 2012 - 00:55

I'm surpirsed no one mentioned O&O Defrag Professional. I have been using it on some of my computers and it works great. It ensures that your SSD's don't get defragged and can automatically run TRIM if you want.

The built-in defragmenter does a fine job as mos have said before. There is no special need for a third-party defragger but I've found that O&O at least makes them run a little faster with it's default shedule plan.

I guess this is just a matter of taste and preference.

#65 Bonfire

Bonfire

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 1
  • Joined: 08-August 05
  • Phone: Rotary Dial

Posted 09 September 2012 - 00:57

Running third party defragmenters is as outdated as manually parking your drive heads. I can't believe people still get worked up over this, just let Windows take care of it and stop worrying about it. :p

#66 Dot Matrix

Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 3
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: Upstate New York
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 09 September 2012 - 01:16

I've run the built in one on Windows 7 and Windows 8... and when it says 0% or 1% fragmented, I can go run a 3rd party, like Defraggler and the map shows it is 30+% fragmented... so I'm not sure how to explain that, since they all use the windows API to defrag. Anyone got an answer for that?

And side note, the built in one is set by default for 3AM on Wednesday I believe, and most people suspend or shut down their systems. I think Windows 8 just now will unsuspend the system at that time by default, but Windows 7 did not.


Since the Windows 7 one runs automatically, I would assume Windows has been keeping your drive neat and tidy.

#67 Mayhem

Mayhem

    Neowinian

  • Joined: 09-February 04

Posted 17 December 2012 - 14:39

sorry to bring back this topic, didn't want to make a new one because this one is full related to my question

i had already posted in this one but no responses, my question still stands

Win8 built in its great and all, 3rd defraggers aren't needed but my question is, how about diskeeper intelliwrite or perfect disk optiwrite ? isn't a great way to make even less defrag required?

my ideia is, win8 built in enabled (running on schedule) and diskeeper all disabled expect intelliwrite

doesn't this "combo" make's better performance in the long run ? just to confirm if intelliwrite/optiwrite does make less fragment's like they claimed

and once again, sorry to bring a old topic

#68 Draconian Guppy

Draconian Guppy

    LippyZillaD Council

  • Tech Issues Solved: 2
  • Joined: 22-August 04
  • Location: Neowin

Posted 17 December 2012 - 15:00

Wasn't the standard in windows 7 not use third party defraggers because they would erase all of the superfetch data and paging file as well?

#69 +LogicalApex

LogicalApex

    Software Engineer

  • Tech Issues Solved: 8
  • Joined: 14-August 02
  • Location: Philadelphia, PA
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64
  • Phone: Nexus 5

Posted 17 December 2012 - 15:24

Wasn't the standard in windows 7 not use third party defraggers because they would erase all of the superfetch data and paging file as well?


No, originally defragmentation tools weren't a good idea due the the way the Volume Shadowcopy Service (VSS) works. Newer defrag utilities are all VSS aware.

VSS is used for system restore and file versioning features of WIndows.

#70 Draconian Guppy

Draconian Guppy

    LippyZillaD Council

  • Tech Issues Solved: 2
  • Joined: 22-August 04
  • Location: Neowin

Posted 17 December 2012 - 23:23

No, originally defragmentation tools weren't a good idea due the the way the Volume Shadowcopy Service (VSS) works. Newer defrag utilities are all VSS aware.

VSS is used for system restore and file versioning features of WIndows.


Yeah that too, sadly I don't remember the thread here in neowin mentioning that how third party defraggers screwed up shadowcopy, superfetch and paging file, out of the top of my head, from what i can remember, IIRC it was something with layout.ini (being redudant on purpose :p ) But don't quote me it, as it's just bits and pieces of memories :p

#71 Mayhem

Mayhem

    Neowinian

  • Joined: 09-February 04

Posted 18 December 2012 - 16:25

sadly i dont find any review about of the impact of intelliwrite/optiwrite, if its really like they say it works and prevent high % of fragmentation and less IO

if its like they say, my idea was to install (ex: diskeeper) and disable all expect intelliwrite and the defrag been care of Win8 built in on schedule

basically dont know if intelliwrite/optiwrite does really bring benefit (less fragmentation, less time to defrag, ...)



Click here to login or here to register to remove this ad, it's free!