False Flags and Imperial Mobilization


Recommended Posts

False Flags and Imperial Mobilization: The Middle East Explodes on 9/11 Anniversary

The annual 9/11 ?remembrance? has become a yearly international holiday for the Big Lie

Every year, people commemorate 9/11 without having a clear understanding of the original event or the elite agenda that made it possible. This lack of comprehension persists, even as the world explodes in series of orchestrated ?new 9/11s? on the eleventh anniversary of the original crime.

What was still is

The attacks of 9/11/01 was a false flag operation of the Bush/Cheney administration and CIA-affiliated military-intelligence assets (Al-Qaeda, etc.). The resulting ?war on terrorism? of the Bush/Cheney and Obama administrations is built on false flag terrorism and propaganda. The ?terrorists? are military-intelligence assets, acting on behalf of Anglo-American leaders and their allies.

9/11 is not history. It is now.

The overriding elite military and intelligence agenda remains the conquest of oil and gas resources. 9/11/01 was the first act of desperation among elites to control all significant energy-related geography on the planet, while preventing rival powers from doing the same.

Under the ?war on terror?, the world has suffered eleven continuous years of false flag terror. Bombings. Destabilizations. Assassinations. Coups and counter-coups. Controlled and co-opted popular revolts and ?mob violence?. Regime changes. Criminality beyond redemption.

As of this writing, new false flag terror attacks in various nations have been carried out by ?terrorists? directly and indirectly connected to the CIA and Washington.

They have taken place simultaneous with mob action and grass roots street protests, likely stoked and guided by military-intelligence assets of the CIA and its affiliates.

The manner of the Benghazi attack suggests military-style coordination (also see here), and that the attack was allowed to happen.

The timing was politically convenient. The anti-Muslim film (allegedly by an American right-wing Christian zealot) that sparked riots, and its translated broadcast in Egypt, demand further inquiry. Popular unrest also appears to be guided and/or co-opted.

While the situation remains fluid, what is beyond question is that in the wake of this violence, there has been no attempt to negotiate peace. Instead, support is being drummed up for retaliation: new military attacks and aggressive US war policies, for either the ?restoration of order? (Libya,), or new and long-planned regime changes (Syria, Iran, Pakistan, etc.) In the famous words of Zbigniew Brzezinski, such attacks would spur the masses to support ?imperial mobilization?.

This is not simply sudden chaos or reaction. Ignoring the multiple red herrings, the central war agenda has not changed in eleven years. It is simply being taken to a new level.

Continued...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its a conspiracy is that.a.way

yeah, right...that worked before we had an ample of evidence that Al-Qaeda was still supported by the U.S.A., before the foreign-funded and executed by Al-Qaeda insurgency in Lybia and Syria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hint: putting "appears to be guided" "appears to be funded" is not the same as proving it.

911 truther blog > its a conspiracy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hint: putting "appears to be guided" "appears to be funded" is not the same as proving it.

911 truther blog > its a conspiracy

Going into a state of denial and attacking the source is the most predictable response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going into a state of denial and attacking the source is the most predictable response.

Claiming that anyone who doesn't accept your **** poor standard of evidence is in denial is a predictable response for a truther.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Claiming that anyone who doesn't accept your **** poor standard of evidence is in denial is a predictable response for a truther.

It's probably not worth trying to, but what the heck...

Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links

How Al Qaeda men came to power in Libya

Syria accuses Turkey of allowing al Qaeda transit

Syria: Al-Qaida's New Playground

I hope the Telegraph, the CTV, and the PBS can match your standard of evidence!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's probably not worth trying to, but what the heck...

Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links

How Al Qaeda men came to power in Libya

Syria accuses Turkey of allowing al Qaeda transit

Syria: Al-Qaida's New Playground

I hope the Telegraph, the CTV, and the PBS can match your standard of evidence!

Yeah now if you could just substantite these instead of bashing a strawman

The attacks of 9/11/01 was a false flag operation of the Bush/Cheney administration

As of this writing, new false flag terror attacks in various nations have been carried out by ?terrorists? directly and indirectly connected to the CIA and Washington.

The manner of the Benghazi attack suggests military-style coordination (also see here), and that the attack was allowed to happen.

The anti-Muslim film (allegedly by an American right-wing Christian zealot) that sparked riots, and its translated broadcast in Egypt, demand further inquiry. Popular unrest also appears to be guided and/or co-opted.

This is whats known as bashing a strawman a common tactic of truthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And they say ignorance is a bliss too!

If you follow the international news, if you have studied the history, if you know at least some basic geopolitical concepts, then the new wave of the redivision of the world that has been happening in the last twenty years would be as clear as day to you...

All the evidence is here, right in front of your eyes, but you choose to stay fixated on petty stuff.

I'm not a truther; I'm not a conspiracy theorist; I'm just a realist, a pragmatic one.

I have, therefore, chosen this time and place to discuss a topic on which ignorance too often abounds and the truth too rarely perceived. And that is the most important topic on earth: peace. What kind of peace do I mean and what kind of a peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living, and the kind that enables men and nations to grow, and to hope, and build a better life for their children -- not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women, not merely peace in our time but peace in all time.

Unfortunately, everything that has happened (and continues to happen) since these words were pronounced happened in exactly the opposite way (because the President who said them was shot dead).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And they say ignorance is a bliss too!

If you follow the international news, if you have studied the history, if you know at least some basic geopolitical concepts, then the new wave of the redivision of the world that has been happening in the last twenty years would be as clear as day to you...

All the evidence is here, right in front of your eyes, but you choose to stay fixated on petty stuff.

I'm not a truther; I'm not a conspiracy theorist; I'm just a realist, a pragmatic one.

Unfortunately, everything that has happened (and continues to happen) since these words were pronounced happened in exactly the opposite way (because the President who said them was shot dead).

The paranoid never think they are paranoid, HItler didn't think he was a ******, and you don't seem to think you are a little loopy.

I'm noticing a pattern

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And they say ignorance is a bliss too!

If you follow the international news, if you have studied the history, if you know at least some basic geopolitical concepts, then the new wave of the redivision of the world that has been happening in the last twenty years would be as clear as day to you...

All the evidence is here, right in front of your eyes, but you choose to stay fixated on petty stuff.

Ok well ill tell you the same thing i tell the christian or the muslim "ok ill believe it then"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The paranoid never think they are paranoid, HItler didn't think he was a ******, and you don't seem to think you are a little loopy.

I'm noticing a pattern

And ignoring the evidence right above your post! Good job!

Here, please show me a single year of peace in the American history without any military operations...

Timeline of United States military operations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like any other former Military, I know people that are currently serving in various positions, many in the SpecOps community, and I guarantee you this is just another badly thought up conspiracy, and the thread really belongs in the conspiracy forum with the other ridiculous stuff that goes in there. Nothing you have shown and even your "proof" is based on a fantasy that somehow Bush and Cheney conspired to make this all happen, just think it over, the logistics alone are impossible, let alone the execution

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you seriously using wikipedia as a source? LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

He already admitted he cant substantiate the claims made in the article so i don't see why he bothers with sources at all.

You cant get to 9/11 was an inside job from "time line of us military interventions"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like any other former Military, I know people that are currently serving in various positions, many in the SpecOps community, and I guarantee you this is just another badly thought up conspiracy, and the thread really belongs in the conspiracy forum with the other ridiculous stuff that goes in there. Nothing you have shown and even your "proof" is based on a fantasy that somehow Bush and Cheney conspired to make this all happen, just think it over, the logistics alone are impossible, let alone the execution

Not all conspiracies are 'theories'. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you seriously using wikipedia as a source? LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Like I had said before, attacking the source is the most predictable response. It's rather typical.

The list through 1975 is based on Committee on International Relations (now known as the Committee on Foreign Affairs).

Anyways, it's up to you to know the history of your country if you wanna be a knowledgeable citizen. So go ahead and pretend the U.S. army has been sitting at home since Vietnam and only went oversees when the others called for help - that's usually how the official story goes in history classes in the U.S.

****s is blowing up here in Afghanistan.

How many total civilian deaths have happened there since 2001?

He already admitted he cant substantiate the claims made in the article so i don't see why he bothers with sources at all.

You cant get to 9/11 was an inside job from "time line of us military interventions"

If the answer to the question I've rhetorically asked above isn't substantial enough for you, than I don't know what is...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did the CIA kidnap you and make you part of MK Ultra, and are you still experiencing its effects, or do you currently smoke crack and drop LSD at the same time? I was a commander in the military, and I have no clue what your refering to or even talking about. But i'm also sure you will show up and start to decry me as part of this 'conspiracy' you seem to have taken part of. Any time anything bad has ever happened in the history of the world, there are always people that jump up and say someone did it for a profit. Its never going to end, and you are doing nothing to help it by claiming that this actually happened. At one point, I worked privately for Bush, and as a US citizen and military commander it would have been my job to do something about it IF he had went off the deep end. He never did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and I have no clue what your refering to or even talking about

Thank you for your comment, commander!

You can start to understand what I'm talking about by reading the article first, checking out the links I've posted, or asking me specific questions on topic without resorting to throwing personal insults!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I threw no personal insults. You are doing a good enough job yourself by making yourself look stupid. I do not need to read any fabrication meant to get people riled up. But as I said, all you will do is decry anything anyone says. I also don't like Wikipedia. God knows its had its fair share of false information posted on it as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not need to read any fabrication meant

...

I also don't like Wikipedia.

Then what are you doing here? You don't want to read the OP, don't want to discuss the topic...why have you come to post here if not to throw insults?

But I'll give you a chance so your time here isn't completely wasted...Tell us, first, commander, where were you stationed or did you work at Pentagon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.