Jump to content



Photo
colorado inhales dangerous chemical king soopers

  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#31 MDboyz

MDboyz

    Neowinian

  • 1,278 posts
  • Joined: 16-November 01

Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:43

When someone will start suing paint pray to contain chemical to make them high, and get them addicted to it?


#32 Anibal P

Anibal P

    Neowinian

  • 4,132 posts
  • Joined: 11-June 02
  • Location: Waterbury CT
  • OS: Win 8.1
  • Phone: Android

Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:54

So now even the Federal courts are rewarding stupidity, it's a shame we've fallen this far down lately

#33 OP Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 61,813 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:58

I wonder how long until he collects his millions. :laugh:

#34 CrashGordon

CrashGordon

    The Perfect Threesome: Lime, Salt & Tequila

  • 5,283 posts
  • Joined: 31-January 04
  • Location: Atlanta, GA
  • Phone: Jackson JS3 Kelly Bird IV through a Fender Rumble 150. Can ya hear me now?

Posted 22 September 2012 - 03:12

Why is he suing the store that sold it? If you're going to sue someone, sue the maker of the product.

Moral of the story: Moderation is key, even "healthy" things when consumed in unreasonable quanities aren't healthy anymore.

#35 Ryoken

Ryoken

    The Other Other White Meat

  • 2,379 posts
  • Joined: 10-September 09
  • Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
  • OS: Windows 7 x64, MacOS
  • Phone: iPhone 4S, Nexus 7, iPad Mini

Posted 22 September 2012 - 03:27

Why is he suing the store that sold it? If you're going to sue someone, sue the maker of the product.

Moral of the story: Moderation is key, even "healthy" things when consumed in unreasonable quanities aren't healthy anymore.

I could be wrong, but I think it was a Store Brand..

#36 CrashGordon

CrashGordon

    The Perfect Threesome: Lime, Salt & Tequila

  • 5,283 posts
  • Joined: 31-January 04
  • Location: Atlanta, GA
  • Phone: Jackson JS3 Kelly Bird IV through a Fender Rumble 150. Can ya hear me now?

Posted 22 September 2012 - 03:41

"Store Brand" or not, the store/chain itself did not make/produce the product. Some other company made/produced it and it was sold under that stores name/brand.

If you're going to sue, at least sue the right entity.

Read the label of any house/store "brand" I'm sure you'll find it was bottled/manufactured/produced by someone other than the one it's being sold under.

#37 FloatingFatMan

FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 15,258 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 22 September 2012 - 11:45

"Store Brand" or not, the store/chain itself did not make/produce the product. Some other company made/produced it and it was sold under that stores name/brand.

If you're going to sue, at least sue the right entity.

Read the label of any house/store "brand" I'm sure you'll find it was bottled/manufactured/produced by someone other than the one it's being sold under.


Irrelevant. The company name on the packaging is the one responsible for the product.

#38 *RedBull*

*RedBull*

    skippy de do da

  • 4,640 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 06
  • Location: Everywhere and No where
  • OS: Windows 8 professional
  • Phone: Android

Posted 22 September 2012 - 21:06

Why are they putting all of this crap in our foods that are slowly killing us.

Well, you're still here I see...:p

#39 Ryoken

Ryoken

    The Other Other White Meat

  • 2,379 posts
  • Joined: 10-September 09
  • Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
  • OS: Windows 7 x64, MacOS
  • Phone: iPhone 4S, Nexus 7, iPad Mini

Posted 23 September 2012 - 02:29

"Store Brand" or not, the store/chain itself did not make/produce the product. Some other company made/produced it and it was sold under that stores name/brand.

If you're going to sue, at least sue the right entity.

Read the label of any house/store "brand" I'm sure you'll find it was bottled/manufactured/produced by someone other than the one it's being sold under.

Actually the store would be at fault.

For example, Loblaws, a grocery chain in Canada, has two store brands, No Name, and Presidents Choice. Loblaws pays for both of them to be made, sure it's done by a 3rd party, but it is still Their product. They are responsible for the products that bare their name. [ I know cause I worked for them, and we found errors before.. ].

Now if it's some other companies product, like a Coke product, then it's Coke's problem. But because it's the store brand, it's theirs. They contract a company to manufacture it, they set out the product they want, and it's made for them, they advertise it, and sell it.

Now depending, the Chain might have a case against the contracted company, but that is their problem.

#40 The Laughing Man

The Laughing Man

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,964 posts
  • Joined: 18-May 03
  • Location: Kyoto, Japan

Posted 23 September 2012 - 02:42

7million? I've said it once and I will say it again, how the hell do these asshats come up with such large numbers???



Click here to login or here to register to remove this ad, it's free!