39 replies to this topic

[MDboyz]

When someone will start suing paint pray to contain chemical to make them high, and get them addicted to it?

[z0phi3l]

So now even the Federal courts are rewarding stupidity, it's a shame we've fallen this far down lately

[Hum]

I wonder how long until he collects his millions.

[CrashGordon]

Why is he suing the store that sold it? If you're going to sue someone, sue the maker of the product.

Moral of the story: Moderation is key, even "healthy" things when consumed in unreasonable quanities aren't healthy anymore.

[Ryoken]

CrashGordon, on 22 September 2012 - 03:12, said:

Why is he suing the store that sold it? If you're going to sue someone, sue the maker of the product.

Moral of the story: Moderation is key, even "healthy" things when consumed in unreasonable quanities aren't healthy anymore.

I could be wrong, but I think it was a Store Brand..

[CrashGordon]

"Store Brand" or not, the store/chain itself did not make/produce the product. Some other company made/produced it and it was sold under that stores name/brand.

If you're going to sue, at least sue the right entity.

Read the label of any house/store "brand" I'm sure you'll find it was bottled/manufactured/produced by someone other than the one it's being sold under.

[FloatingFatMan]

CrashGordon, on 22 September 2012 - 03:41, said:

"Store Brand" or not, the store/chain itself did not make/produce the product. Some other company made/produced it and it was sold under that stores name/brand.

If you're going to sue, at least sue the right entity.

Read the label of any house/store "brand" I'm sure you'll find it was bottled/manufactured/produced by someone other than the one it's being sold under.

Irrelevant. The company name on the packaging is the one responsible for the product.

[*RedBull*]

Growled, on 21 September 2012 - 00:09, said:

Why are they putting all of this crap in our foods that are slowly killing us.

Well, you're still here I see...

[Ryoken]

CrashGordon, on 22 September 2012 - 03:41, said:

"Store Brand" or not, the store/chain itself did not make/produce the product. Some other company made/produced it and it was sold under that stores name/brand.

If you're going to sue, at least sue the right entity.

Read the label of any house/store "brand" I'm sure you'll find it was bottled/manufactured/produced by someone other than the one it's being sold under.

Actually the store would be at fault.

For example, Loblaws, a grocery chain in Canada, has two store brands, No Name, and Presidents Choice. Loblaws pays for both of them to be made, sure it's done by a 3rd party, but it is still Their product. They are responsible for the products that bare their name. [ I know cause I worked for them, and we found errors before.. ].

Now if it's some other companies product, like a Coke product, then it's Coke's problem. But because it's the store brand, it's theirs. They contract a company to manufacture it, they set out the product they want, and it's made for them, they advertise it, and sell it.

Now depending, the Chain might have a case against the contracted company, but that is their problem.

[The Laughing Man]

7million? I've said it once and I will say it again, how the hell do these asshats come up with such large numbers???