Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|ACRONIS keeps failing no reason given||
|Small cockroach problem... Any way to produce a genocide?||
|The Big Wrestling Thread!||
|Dumped woman spends a week in KFC to get over ex||
|Felicia Day writes post about #GamerGate, gets doxxed||
Posted 27 September 2012 - 23:39
Posted 27 September 2012 - 23:41
Posted 27 September 2012 - 23:43
Each console revision is slightly different, but basically the same. Similar to the Xbox.
The big differences that you run into based on older to new is the removal of backwards compatibility and such. The earliest models had that built-in. The newer models do not.
There are also some port changes and such, but in general a PS3 is a PS3 is a PS3.
Posted 27 September 2012 - 23:44
Posted 27 September 2012 - 23:46
i really though there was a difference Difference between the two
Posted 27 September 2012 - 23:47
Agreed, at this point I'd just pick up the newest revision as its the smallest. Unless of you can find a deal on the current version.
Posted 27 September 2012 - 23:50
Posted 27 September 2012 - 23:58
Posted 28 September 2012 - 09:57
Posted 28 September 2012 - 23:51
The first editions of PS3 had very ****ty PS2 emulation capabilities, apart from that they should be functionally all the same. And for PS2 emulation (on the PC) there is PCSX2 with its magic, so....
Posted 31 October 2012 - 01:08
Posted 31 October 2012 - 01:23
All they really ahould do is either build the new super slim with more ram, or at least add an external adapter for some extra ram.
Posted 31 October 2012 - 01:59
Posted 31 October 2012 - 02:20
Why would they do that? No one is going to develop a game that only works on the brand new PS3s with more RAM.
Posted 31 October 2012 - 02:33