Jump to content



Photo

14 year old girl has baby in toilet and then kills it

murder abortion child

  • Please log in to reply
84 replies to this topic

#16 OP Yogurtmaster

Yogurtmaster

    Neowinian

  • 1,225 posts
  • Joined: 18-February 12

Posted 02 October 2012 - 07:39

Not sure if serious or just overwhelmingly stupid.

My dog raises better points of discussion than you.

Such as "RUFF RUFF grrrr, snarl bark?" What a riveting conversation that was.


I posted what I thought was a good point and you try to make it into a terrible joke with very little humor or value.
Typical.

a fetus isnt a baby, its not a individual living being, in the first and second trimester its arguable that its a sack of cells that on their own wouldn't do anything


Didn't some people on earth think that other races aren't human as well. A fetus is a baby, it's the same thing. It's just a name that you give to something so killing it doesn't sound so bad.

If you don't humanize killing it's just fine. This X race wasn't human, they are animals, thus it's okay to kill them.

That is how humans can justify killing, if you call them by a different name and you spread that, people won't feel so bad about doing it.


#17 dead.cell

dead.cell

    My Body My Temple

  • 10,302 posts
  • Joined: 09-July 04
  • Location: Houston, TX
  • OS: Win 7 Pro / Win 8 Pro
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S5 Active

Posted 02 October 2012 - 07:55

What a terrible lure. Not even gonna contribute to this mess, other than to provide a fix for the broken link.

http://www2.tbo.com/...-new-ar-516071/

#18 Nick H.

Nick H.

    Neowinian Senior

  • 11,571 posts
  • Joined: 28-June 04
  • Location: Switzerland

Posted 02 October 2012 - 08:02

A fetus is a baby, it's the same thing.

Wikipedia article for Foetus
Wikipedia article for Infant (baby)

No, they're not the same thing. For one a foetus can't feel pain, whereas a born baby can.

#19 *RedBull*

*RedBull*

    skippy de do da

  • 4,640 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 06
  • Location: Everywhere and No where
  • OS: Windows 8 professional
  • Phone: Android

Posted 02 October 2012 - 08:04

Well she's 14. She'll be out by 18. So one can only hope she gets an education and realizes what she's done. I'm sure she'll be regretting it the rest of her life. But the real story needs to be how she got pregnant. Test that DNA to see if it were a relative or maybe someone she knows.

#20 compl3x

compl3x

    Feels good, dunnit?

  • 8,413 posts
  • Joined: 06-December 09
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S4

Posted 02 October 2012 - 09:00

Perhaps more money invested in sex-ed and a change in cultural attitudes towards sex would help avoid issues like this.

Oh wait, can't do that either. That too is morally wrong.

#21 Simon-

Simon-

    Neowinian Senior

  • 10,724 posts
  • Joined: 04-November 02

Posted 02 October 2012 - 09:09

This is why abortion should be legal, to stop immature teens do twisted **** like this when the fetus/baby is near-term/full-term/born and is capable or living outside the womb. Not that I think it would have helped in this case as she kept the whole thing a secret. Maybe better education/parenting/social attitudes/PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY.

#22 TPreston

TPreston

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,583 posts
  • Joined: 18-July 12
  • Location: Ireland
  • OS: Windows 8.1 Enterprise & Server 2012R2/08R2 Datacenter
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 1520

Posted 02 October 2012 - 09:25

Didn't some people on earth think that other races aren't human as well. A fetus is a baby, it's the same thing. It's just a name that you give to something so killing it doesn't sound so bad.


Posted Image



Thats not a baby, Which is why aborting it isnt murder, Which is why we don't have a funeral when one is flushed (which is what happens to most of them anyway).

Only the willfully ignorant don't understand this.

#23 FloatingFatMan

FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 15,894 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:01

Source:
http://www2.tbo.com/....new-ar-516071/


Why is this so illegal when abortion is legal? What difference does life make in or out of the womb (double standards)
If she would have had an abortion it would be an A-OKAY, but she had the baby and kills it and it's now murder.

I personally think both should be murder, but I find it comical sad that morality has sunk so low in this country.
That murder is now considered to be a woman's right because of selfish reasons.

I love the women's rights movement because they need them, and they should be respected and they should have
the same rights as men, because otherwise it's a double standard, but murder should not be a right anywhere in this country
for anything in this country.

But hey, maybe some day that murder will be fine no matter what and we will all be just holding society back with our old fashioned
morals and values.

Why am I tying abortion into this post, because it's both related and ironic.


Your pathetic attempt to use this terribly tragic story to further your religion based, anti-abortion agenda, both sickens and disgusts me.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

#24 d4rk5ky

d4rk5ky

    Tech Head

  • 587 posts
  • Joined: 29-March 08
  • Location: NB, Canada
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64
  • Phone: iPhone 4S

Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:15

Page has 404, what a surprise lol

#25 ILikeTobacco

ILikeTobacco

    Neowinian Senior

  • 4,789 posts
  • Joined: 08-July 10

Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:24

Wikipedia article for Foetus
Wikipedia article for Infant (baby)

No, they're not the same thing. For one a foetus can't feel pain, whereas a born baby can.

But neither are an actual person or have a moral right to life according to some medical ethicists so being the same thing doesn't actually matter. Morally, there is no difference a new born and a fetus since neither have plans or goals and there is nothing to deprive them of. If you disagree with that, go argue with the Medical Journal of Ethics which is a respected journal.

#26 SiCKX

SiCKX

    Cannibal

  • 1,280 posts
  • Joined: 23-November 06
  • Location: Errywhere
  • OS: Windows 7 x64

Posted 02 October 2012 - 13:05

She pooped a baby and the thing killed itself when it saw how the world looks and knew how silly people will argue over the internets over its death.
It was a marketing move, from the baby... to take most attention from the other babies he was competing with.

#27 Nick H.

Nick H.

    Neowinian Senior

  • 11,571 posts
  • Joined: 28-June 04
  • Location: Switzerland

Posted 02 October 2012 - 13:08

Morally, there is no difference...

Ah, but whose morals are we working with here? Yours? Mine? Yogurtmaster's?

Morals aren't specific. We might share some morals, but we might differ with other morals. Your argument makes sense in so far as a baby and a foetus will have the same morals (ref: none), but we don't inspect a thing's morals before deciding if it should continue living or not.

#28 ahhell

ahhell

    Neowinian Senior

  • 8,896 posts
  • Joined: 30-June 03
  • Location: Winnipeg - coldest place on Earth - yeah

Posted 02 October 2012 - 13:14

Why am I tying abortion into this post, because it's both related and ironic.


It's ironic that you don't know what irony is.

#29 ILikeTobacco

ILikeTobacco

    Neowinian Senior

  • 4,789 posts
  • Joined: 08-July 10

Posted 02 October 2012 - 14:00

Ah, but whose morals are we working with here? Yours? Mine? Yogurtmaster's?

Morals aren't specific. We might share some morals, but we might differ with other morals. Your argument makes sense in so far as a baby and a foetus will have the same morals (ref: none), but we don't inspect a thing's morals before deciding if it should continue living or not.

The arguement isn't much about what factors we use to decide on whether it should live or not, but rather that if it is ethically fine to kill a fetus, then for the exact same reasons it is ethically fine to kill a newborn. Side note: should have said ethically no difference as the paper points out. Look it up in the Medical Journal of Ethics, it is an interesting read. I only have a physically copy of it and haven't had luck finding a free copy of it online.

#30 Nick H.

Nick H.

    Neowinian Senior

  • 11,571 posts
  • Joined: 28-June 04
  • Location: Switzerland

Posted 02 October 2012 - 14:15

...if it is ethically fine to kill a fetus, then for the exact same reasons it is ethically fine to kill a newborn.

Even if you switch "morals" for "ethics" your above statement isn't true. For one, ethics can differ from one person to another just the same as morals can, so again we need to agree on what the ethics are. Secondly, you need to explain to me how if it is ethically to kill a foetus it is therefore ethically fine to kill a baby.

In my mind it is ethically fine to kill a foetus in the initial stages because the foetus has not developed thought and cannot feel pain. But a baby can feel pain, and is at least capable of the most basic of thoughts ("I'm hungry" "I'm tired" and so on). I guess the best way for me to explain my view is that I consider a baby to be a small person, and a foetus has the human capabilities of a tennis ball. But again, these are my views. Others (such as yogurtmaster) have different views and values.

I would take you up on the idea of reading the Medical Journal of Ethics as I have no doubt that it would be interesting to read, but I'm no doctor and don't fancy the idea of paying to read one article.