Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|SWAT officer shot in the face breaking into window during no-knock raid||
|The Big Wrestling Thread!||
|Sony rejected EA Access for the PS4 because it's not worth the money||
|Obama to Republicans: 'So sue me'||
|i5-4690K w/H80i temperature?||
Posted 13 October 2012 - 09:06
Posted 15 October 2012 - 15:26
I don't know if you're being serious or not here... You're seriously suggesting that we shouldn't be allowed to run more than one app at a time on Quad Core CPUs with HT (which effectively handle 8 threads at a time)?
Posted 30 April 2013 - 14:13
Posted 01 May 2013 - 04:02
If background apps only get 1-2 CPU seconds per 15 minutes, how come there are music streaming apps that run just fine in the background? Is that enough for them, or is there something else I'm missing?
I thought metro apps could only be in focus, suspended, or not running. And suspended (background apps) only got very little CPU time allotted to them for push notifications and such.
Posted 01 May 2013 - 05:18
I never suggested anything of the sort. What makes you think I did?
Posted 01 May 2013 - 05:27
there are certain scenarios when background stuff is permitted and theres a part of the API for that. This includes background audio and background downloading.