Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



U.S. Government Tries to Stop Megaupload Successor


5 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 Asrokhel

    Resident Elite

  • 1,027 posts
  • Joined: 05-April 12
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro x64 (testing to see if I keep it or go back to Windows 7)

Posted 31 October 2012 - 23:25

US Department of Justice argues that Dotcom will breach the terms of his bail if he launched Mega.

The U.S. government has warned Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom not to launch the recently unveiled successor to the file sharing site, Mega, as it may apparently breach his New Zealand bail conditions.

The U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion last week that argues that Dotcom had deliberately misled the foreign court.

A January bail application affidavit sees Dotcom stating that he had no plans of rebooting Megaupload or “some new iteration of the site”. However, prosecutor Neil MacBride has stressed that Mega is a violation of the claim made by Dotcom.

"Defence counsel's claim that the corporate defendant can and should be allowed to operate undermines the sworn statements of Dotcom that he has no plans or ability to continue to operate or fund the businesses in the indictment during pendency of the extradition process," MacBride said.

Dotcom’s lawyer, Ira Rothken, responded to the allegations by stating the suggestions are baseless. "It's a serious allegation, but we believe it is an ignorant allegation and they're basing it upon absolute speculation,” he said. "It sounds like the United States is attacking a technology before they fully investigate it. This looks to be the second time they're doing that. Kim Dotcom is innocent, and he's entitled to be involved in technology and business."

Mega, a file sharing site that works in a similar fashion to its predecessor, is said to be raid-proof through the implementation of an "Advanced Encryption Standard algorithm".

Dotcom said that the site, which is due for a 2012 launch, is not "a giant middle finger to Hollywood and the DoJ" as it'll have rules in place allowing copyright holders to send the DMCA a takedown notice in order to remove copyright-infringing content from the service.









http://www.tomsguide...news-16232.html


#2 vetGrowled

    Resident Rockstar

  • 36,016 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 01 November 2012 - 00:10

The US government should spend their time chasing the real bad guys and leave Dotcom alone. May I suggest they start first with the MPAA and the RIAA.

#3 syobon999

    Neowinian³

  • 360 posts
  • Joined: 22-December 09

Posted 01 November 2012 - 01:03

we need anonymous file sharing, the japanese have done some interesting programs like 'perfect dark' that uses a system resembling freenet to share content...

#4 FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 11,423 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 01 November 2012 - 07:24

This pretty much proves that the US has a personal vendetta against Dotcom...

#5 Glassed Silver

    ☆♡Neowin's portion of Crazy♡☆

  • 10,729 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 04
  • Location: MY CATFORT in Kassel, Germany
  • OS: OS X ML; W7; Elementary; Android 4
  • Phone: iPhone 5 64GB Black (6.0.2)

Posted 01 November 2012 - 10:47

Nice to see the US so worried about his bail! /s

Growled pretty much nailed it! :)

Glassed Silver:ios

#6 Simon-

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 10,720 posts
  • Joined: 04-November 02

Posted 01 November 2012 - 10:57

For the way that they have treated him, yes he deserves to be able to stick it to them once again. I love how the plan is to make them file a copyright claim (blacklist) rather than needing approval for every submission (whitelist), and yes- innocent until proven guilty, it's going to basically work the sam, except this time actually handle their claims while still putting the onus on them do some work and to prove their copyright before take down. Don't want to make it too easy for the ********.