Jump to content

63 posts in this topic

Posted

The problem I have with skype is there is no A-Patch for it, and according to their site, they are not going to be doing one for it either

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Can't seem to send files either, let alone view together?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

As a user I'm quite happy using Facebook for my communication. From a business POV however I wouldn't like a scenario in which my data is under someone else's control. I can't see Facebook replacing most business email any time soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='wotsit' timestamp='1359901831' post='595498496']
Having now switched, Microsoft appear to have gotten foolishly ahead of themselves.

There's basic WLM functionality just not in Skype, such as nudges. offline Facebook messaging, and Hotmail e-mail notifications.

hmmmmmm - odd decision!
[/quote]

This was my opinion on the matter the whole time, the complete lack of features in Skype it'll only serve to push people to more
mature clients after they try Skype instead of WLM.

But I am also sure there will be a hack to change the client ID for the last version of WLM to allow it to logon, it should be a simple
enough hexedit to change the client ID, but that will only delay WLMs shutdown, but it'll give those people using WLM and MS more
time to get Skype's features closer in line to what they expect from the WLM service currently.

Of course they could pull a Windows 8 and tell us less features and basic look/functionality is better and that we're wrong for not
liking it. :shifty:
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='JaredFrost' timestamp='1359911042' post='595498774']


This was my opinion on the matter the whole time, the complete lack of features in Skype it'll only serve to push people to more
mature clients after they try Skype instead of WLM.

But I am also sure there will be a hack to change the client ID for the last version of WLM to allow it to logon, it should be a simple
enough hexedit to change the client ID, but that will only delay WLMs shutdown, but it'll give those people using WLM and MS more
time to get Skype's features closer in line to what they expect from the WLM service currently.

Of course they could pull a Windows 8 and tell us less features and basic look/functionality is better and that we're wrong for not
liking it. :shifty:
[/quote]
They'll move to a more "mature" client? Becuz Skype doesn't do the kiddie stuff that WLM does, like winks and nudges? That's hilarious.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='LUTZIFER' timestamp='1359912137' post='595498810']
They'll move to a more "mature" client? Becuz Skype doesn't do the kiddie stuff that WLM does, like winks and nudges? That's hilarious.
[/quote]
BUT MA GIANT PURPLZ FONT, I NEEDS IT!!1111

Git ta fook.

The fact that I can see up to 10x more actual text in conversations without being distracted by backgrounds or flashy fonts is one of the primary reasons why I support this change.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='Belazor' timestamp='1359912362' post='595498816']
BUT MA GIANT PURPLZ FONT, I NEEDS IT!!1111

Git ta fook.

The fact that I can see up to 10x more actual text in conversations without being distracted by backgrounds or flashy fonts is one of the primary reasons why I support this change.
[/quote]

Skype's contact grouping is almost non-existent compared to WLM's. Without that functionality, I just won't use Skype.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='LUTZIFER' timestamp='1359912137' post='595498810']
They'll move to a more "mature" client? Becuz Skype doesn't do the kiddie stuff that WLM does, like winks and nudges? That's hilarious.
[/quote]

I didn't mention those features at all, now did I, the only deal breakers for me are really just offline messaging, remote assistance and file transfering.

And since you mentioned 'becuz' I wouldn't mind seeing a built in spellcheck added.

[quote name='Belazor' timestamp='1359912362' post='595498816']
BUT MA GIANT PURPLZ FONT, I NEEDS IT!!1111

Git ta fook.

The fact that I can see up to 10x more actual text in conversations without being distracted by backgrounds or flashy fonts is one of the primary reasons why I support this change.
[/quote]

I don't know who you've been talking to on WLM that sets their background images and text like that, but that's a class of friends issue
And a plus on the client, since it actually allows you to set crap like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

People still use MSN?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

[quote name='JaredFrost' timestamp='1359912901' post='595498836']I didn't mention those features at all, now did I, the only deal breakers for me are really just offline messaging, remote assistance and file transfering. And since you mentioned 'becuz' I wouldn't mind seeing a built in spellcheck added. [/quote]Offline messaging on WLM is crap compared to Skype, and you also cannot send files to contacts that are offline. That's a deal breaker for me.

Remote Assistance works better if it's done via TeamViewer or similar apps :)
Getting WLM's RA to work is a pain in the arse.

[quote name='JaredFrost' timestamp='1359912901' post='595498836']I don't know who you've been talking to on WLM that sets their background images and text like that, but that's a class of friends issue And a plus on the client, since it actually allows you to set crap like that. [/quote]How the baws is that a plus on the client? It has no purpose being in a chat client, and certainly not displayed to other people.

[quote name='FloatingFatMan' timestamp='1359912842' post='595498826'] Skype's contact grouping is almost non-existent compared to WLM's. Without that functionality, I just won't use Skype. [/quote]
Really?

I can create new contact groups, just like WLM. I don't see a single difference :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Whenever I used Skype as an IM client I found it pretty unreliable. I hope Microsoft put some funds into improving it. Skype was definitely a better VOIP client but I feel MSN was a better IM client.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

are they still going to update the Windows Essentials suite?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

My guess would be that they'll either put skype into it in place of MSN, or simply remove MSN from it. I can't see them retiring them all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.