Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|AMD reports a dim financial picture and withdraws from high-density server business||
|Take a look at your Google Dashboard Location History.||
|Russia announces plan to build new space station with NASA||
|How To Store Other Things||
|KDE ships version 5.2 of plasma next workspace||
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:48
Posted 11 November 2012 - 07:14
Posted 11 November 2012 - 07:40
My intuition tells me Crucial m4. Fast and a great Marvell controller.
Posted 11 November 2012 - 08:06
Posted 11 November 2012 - 11:35
I would tend to agree, but the performance you get from the SSD is worth the risk of it dying on you.
Posted 11 November 2012 - 22:06
It's a choice you have to make. And until SSD drives won't have something more meaningful for data storage like PCM of memristor chips (let's say, within the next five years?), I will always choose to spend the extra money an SSD will cost on a server-grade hard disk drives with spinning platters....
Posted 11 November 2012 - 22:36
Regardless of "reliable" or not, every SSD can and will brick eventually.
Posted 11 November 2012 - 23:04
Posted 11 November 2012 - 23:10
I second that.
Plextor M5 Pro
Posted 12 November 2012 - 00:05
Posted 12 November 2012 - 01:12
Posted 25 November 2012 - 02:08