Jump to content


90 year-old man sued by burglar he shot

california world war ii vet attempted murder castle doctrine

  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 Hum


    totally wAcKed

  • 63,716 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 10 November 2012 - 21:42

A World War II vet says he was tied up and shot twice during an attempted burglary earlier this year inside his California home. The accused criminal sees things differently, though, and now wants to file charges of his own.

Samuel Joseph Cutrufelli, 31, is on trial for attempted murder after allegedly shooting 90-year-old Jay Leone in the jaw and the back during a home robbery-gone-wrong back in January. When Cutrufelli attempted to flee Mr. Leone’s home after things went awry, though, the nonagenarian managed to make off firing a few rounds of his own.

According to Mr. Leone’s take, he was tied up by Cutrufelli at gunpoint and left to watch while the suspect snuck around the Greenbrae, CA residence attempting to empty it of anything of value. Leone soon managed to wiggle himself free though, then pleaded with the suspect to let him use the bathroom. On the way, he found one of five handguns stored throughout the house and approached the criminal during mid-burglary.

Cutrufelli, Leone says, fired first.

"The .45 hit me right in the face here and went through the back of my head," the vet told jurors during court proceedings earlier this month. "I didn't feel a thing."

So nonplussed was Leone, in fact, that he managed to fire off a few rounds himself moments after being shot in the face.

"I said, 'F—- you, you son of a bitch, now it's my turn," Leone admitted to the court.

Cutrufelli made it away from the scene, but not before allegedly wrestling Leone to the ground and trying to kill him; prosecutor Dorothy Chou Proudfoot told the court that Cutrufelli would have executed his victim at point-blank range had his gun not run out of bullets.

“After trying to kill him once, he tried to kill him again," she told the court.

Cutrufelli was captured by authorities shortly after once he was spotted bleeding in his car near the scene of the crime, the Marin Independent Journal reports. At the time, the suspect told investigators that he had shot himself, but since his attorney has opened up about the truth. Now lawyers for the defense label Cutrufelli as a user of methamphetamines and that, inexplicably, the whole event unraveled as part of “a drug deal gone bad.”

This week, the defense altered their case once more. Now attorneys for Cutrufelli say they are suing the veteran because Leone “negligently shot” the robber in the back, causing “great bodily injury, and other financial damage, including loss of Mr. Cutrufelli’s home, and also the dissolution of Mr. Cutrufelli’s marriage.”

When the Marin Independent Journal asked Mr. Leone to comment on the latest charges this week, he told the paper he was unaware of the suit.

“He's the one who busted my door in," he said. "I'll just countersue him then. That's what I'll need to do."

If Cutrufelli is convicted of all charges, the father of two could be sentenced to life in prison. Assuming he doesn’t win the counter case, of course.


#2 *RedBull*


    skippy de do da

  • 4,640 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 06
  • Location: Everywhere and No where
  • OS: Windows 8 professional
  • Phone: Android

Posted 10 November 2012 - 22:08

Ridiculous, is that San Fran again? Nope just some other part of the nut job state of Cali.

#3 OP Hum


    totally wAcKed

  • 63,716 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 10 November 2012 - 22:11

I would not convict the home owner.

#4 Growled


    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 11 November 2012 - 02:43

You would have thought that he had learned the first time not to mess with that old man.

#5 gdodson


    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,405 posts
  • Joined: 03-October 04

Posted 11 November 2012 - 02:52

Another reason that you're better off killing the intruder

#6 Anibal P

Anibal P


  • 4,898 posts
  • Joined: 11-June 02
  • Location: Waterbury CT
  • OS: Win 8.1
  • Phone: Android

Posted 11 November 2012 - 02:59

I feel sorry for the victim Mr. Leone, he lives in Cali, there's a good chance the criminal will win and have all charges dropped

In any other State where reason and logic rule, Mr. Leone would have an open and shut case

#7 VerletzerCR



  • 18 posts
  • Joined: 04-November 12

Posted 11 November 2012 - 03:05

Another example of criminal victimization.

#8 Gerowen


    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,706 posts
  • Joined: 28-August 05
  • Location: Hills of Kentucky
  • OS: Ubuntu Linux

Posted 11 November 2012 - 03:26

Yay California. /sarcasm

#9 DocM


    Neowinian Senior

  • 21,462 posts
  • Joined: 31-July 10
  • Location: Michigan

Posted 11 November 2012 - 03:39

Good ole Califlakey - one of the now few states where this is still allowed. The vast majority of states have Castle Doctrine laws which provide a self-defender with criminal and civil immunity in situations like this.

#10 Growled


    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 11 November 2012 - 03:47

Don't forget this is Obama country. :D

#11 IceBreakerG


    Local Ninja! Code Ninja That Is.

  • 2,179 posts
  • Joined: 27-August 06
  • Location: Cordova, TN
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: OnePlus One

Posted 11 November 2012 - 13:29

Don't forget this is Obama country. :D

:argh: As someone that was born and raised in the "wonderful" state of California, I can assure you this has jack squat to do with Obama. None, whatsoever. Please stop blaming him for crap that has NOTHING to do with him. California is the most liberal state in the country, and they also have some of the dumbest civilian laws I have ever seen. The fact that the deathly challenged robber is even able to sue Mr. Leone is about as screwed up as it gets after trying to kill him not once, but twice. This is an excellent example of why it's implied that when you "neutralize" the threat, you make sure it's "neutralized."

#12 vetCalum


    Neowinian Senior

  • 13,211 posts
  • Joined: 10-January 07

Posted 11 November 2012 - 13:57

The only victim here is the homeowner. He should not even need a lawyer: The judge, jury, court (whoever) should all realise that this homeowner did nothing wrong, and that the only criminal is the disgusting robber.