Jump to content

patents apple samsung jury

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Boz


    Neowinian Senior

  • 7,492 posts
  • Joined: 21-October 03

Posted 12 November 2012 - 21:25

The judge who presided over the patent litigation between Apple and Samsung Electronics said she will consider Samsung's concern that the foreman of the jury had concealed relevant information.

A jury in California decided in August that the South Korean company must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing several of its patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung has, however, asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury, Velvin Hogan, was untruthful and biased. In the voir dire, a court procedure of questioning prospective jurors for potential bias, Hogan did not mention that he had been sued by his former employer, Seagate, for breach of contract after he failed to repay a promissory note in 1993 and filed for bankruptcy six months later, according to the filing on October 2.

Samsung has a "substantial strategic relationship with Seagate," and is the single largest direct shareholder of the hard drive manufacturer after selling it a business division last year, it said in the filing.


#2 The Laughing Man

The Laughing Man

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,964 posts
  • Joined: 18-May 03
  • Location: Kyoto, Japan

Posted 12 November 2012 - 21:31

Just when we thought it was all over...

#3 shakey


    It's soooooo Educational

  • 11,021 posts
  • Joined: 31-March 04
  • Location: Austin, Tx

Posted 12 November 2012 - 21:33

Hopefully Apple gets handed more fines. It's just what they deserve after everything they have been trying to pull.

#4 Raa


    Resident president

  • 13,487 posts
  • Joined: 03-April 02
  • Location: NSW, Australia

Posted 12 November 2012 - 21:50

Just when we thought it was all over...

Oh no, we knew this was coming...

#5 Lord Method Man

Lord Method Man


  • 3,758 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 12

Posted 12 November 2012 - 21:56

Very clear misconduct here. How many of the jurors were seen a few weeks later standing in line for the iPhone 5?

#6 Phouchg


    has stopped responding

  • 5,689 posts
  • Joined: 28-March 11

Posted 12 November 2012 - 21:56

Posted Image

#7 Growled


    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 12 November 2012 - 22:09

I think Samsung has a strong case here for misconduct.

#8 Anibal P

Anibal P


  • 4,898 posts
  • Joined: 11-June 02
  • Location: Waterbury CT
  • OS: Win 8.1
  • Phone: Android

Posted 12 November 2012 - 22:17

I think Samsung has a strong case here for misconduct.

Considering how many real legal experts believe the same thing, it might have been career suicide for her to not open it up for investigation