Lord Method Man, on 14 November 2012 - 17:55, said:
I wonder what kind of goodies Apple gave to the jurors in exchange for their verdict.
They didn't need to. They jury foreman led the rest to ignore the prior art, and from what I read, also owns a patent that Apple uses...
Plus, the trial should NEVER have been held in Apple's home town. A huge part of the populace either works for, or has relations connected to Apple in some way or other. The whole town is crawling with Apple fans.