Jump to content



Photo

  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#1 Asrokhel

Asrokhel

    Neowinian

  • 1,027 posts
  • Joined: 05-April 12
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro x64 (testing to see if I keep it or go back to Windows 7)

Posted 14 November 2012 - 23:11

Cutting-edge research around the world will soon launch a new era in human procreation – a world in which embryos can be ‘brought to term’ in artificial wombs, replacing traditional pregnancies.

In "Like a Virgin: How Science is Redefining the Rules of Sex," author and genetic scientists, Aarathi Prasad writes, "This might be the biological and social equalizer, a truly new way of thinking about sex."

Cornell University's Dr. Hung-Ching Liu has engineered endometrial tissues by prompting cells to grow in an artificial uterus. When Liu introduced a mouse embryo into the lab-created uterine lining, "It successfully implanted and grew healthy," she said in this New Atlantis Magazine article. Scientists predict the research could produce an animal womb by 2020, and a human model by early 2030s.

In Japan, Juntendo University researcher Yosinori Kuwabara and his team kept goat fetuses growing for ten days. While this womb was only a prototype, Kuwabara predicts that a fully functioning artificial womb capable of gestating a human fetus will evolve in the near future.

However, ethicists voice concerns that this technology could endanger the very meaning of life. Mother-child relationships, the nature of female bodies, and being 'born', not 'made' all play a role in defining how most people around the world view this magical state of existence called life. Artificial wombs will enable both men and women to reproduce entirely alone, removing intercourse from the reproductive equation.

But proponents believe people will reason, "Why risk gestating the baby in a biological womb, when this new science can produce a child with our exact genetic makeup, perfect personality, and zero flaws."

"The womb is a dark and dangerous place, a hazardous environment," says University of Virginia Professor Joseph Fletcher. Fetuses are 100% dependent on their mom's health and sensible judgment. If the mother falls prey to accidents, disease, or inadequate nutrition, the embryo can become traumatized.

Although naysayers believe that this bold science makes us less human, most experts predict that artificial wombs will one day be accepted by mainstream society as more people recognize its many benefits. Babies would no longer be exposed to alcohol or illegal drugs by careless mothers, and the correct body temperature would always be maintained, with 100% of necessary nutrients provided.

Concerns over losing emotional bond between mother and newborn are unwarranted, say scientists. Artificial intelligence advances expected over the next two decades will enable doctors to reproduce exact parent emotions and personalities via vocal recordings, movement, and other sensations. The developing infant would be maintained in a safe secure environment, connected electronically to the mother 24/7.

In the near term though, experts predict most women will probably gestate their children the old-fashioned way; but career-minded females might welcome a concept that allows them to bear children and raise a family without becoming pregnant, a physical condition that often weakens their job status.

Ultimately, this technology would enable anyone – single, married, male, female, young, old, heterosexual or gay – to combine DNA from his or her own body with another person; and the gene pool marches on; a clean birth without pain or morning sickness.

As this science matures, people could freeze eggs and sperm in their teen years when they are most physically fit; then create children later when ready for a family. Artificial wombs may sound radical, but people already donate eggs and sperm to create life in a lab and bring it to term in a surrogate mother.

In an unusual twist, this technology offers justification to pro-lifers in the abortion debates. Choosing an abortion to protect a mother's health would not be necessary, as artificial wombs could bring all aborted embryos to term. Unwanted pregnancies would no longer mean a death sentence for the unborn.

As we move into the future, this procedure could become the preferred method of birthing; but today, many disagree. Some see artificial wombs as a triumph of modern science; others believe it's the ultimate folly. We ask again; is a sexless reproduction society in our future? Time will tell. Comments welcome.











http://ieet.org/inde...lletier20121113



#2 Original Poster

Original Poster

    Systems Developer

  • 3,009 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 08
  • Location: my room
  • OS: windows 7/8, Kali, ubuntu, OSx 10.9
  • Phone: Android

Posted 14 November 2012 - 23:14

wow nice text .... -_____-

#3 Marshall

Marshall

    ▇ ▂ ▃ ▁ ▁ ▅

  • 12,753 posts
  • Joined: 22-June 03
  • Location: USA

Posted 14 November 2012 - 23:16

It only takes a couple of clicks to make the font readable. I realize you copied and pasted that from the source but you should take the time to format it correctly.

Most people will overlook this based on the small font size alone. Just FYI. :)

#4 OP Asrokhel

Asrokhel

    Neowinian

  • 1,027 posts
  • Joined: 05-April 12
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro x64 (testing to see if I keep it or go back to Windows 7)

Posted 14 November 2012 - 23:19

It was normal after I checked it the first time, not sure what happened.

#5 ArialBlue

ArialBlue

    var lulz;

  • 1,768 posts
  • Joined: 24-June 10
  • Location: Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • OS: Windows Master Race

Posted 14 November 2012 - 23:31

I have seen in this in a dystopian film, therefore it must be a bad idea.

#6 Original Poster

Original Poster

    Systems Developer

  • 3,009 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 08
  • Location: my room
  • OS: windows 7/8, Kali, ubuntu, OSx 10.9
  • Phone: Android

Posted 14 November 2012 - 23:42

no! if you cant give birth you are not meant to spread your dna! damn it cant we just have one chance to evolve ?

#7 Glassed Silver

Glassed Silver

    ☆♡Neowin's portion of Crazy♡☆

  • 10,729 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 04
  • Location: MY CATFORT in Kassel, Germany
  • OS: OS X ML; W7; Elementary; Android 4
  • Phone: iPhone 5 64GB Black (6.0.2)

Posted 14 November 2012 - 23:45

no! if you cant give birth you are not meant to spread your dna! damn it cant we just have one chance to evolve ?

Can't tell if serious or...

Glassed Silver:mac

#8 Roxkis

Roxkis

    Neowinian

  • 197 posts
  • Joined: 10-May 08

Posted 14 November 2012 - 23:53

I can't give any real reason why but, this just doesn't sit well with me.
I think its a reason nature set things up the way it has. This may have implications
beyond whats foreseeable. Thats what my guts tell me.

#9 Colin McGregor

Colin McGregor

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,704 posts
  • Joined: 02-September 11
  • Location: Ontario, Canada
  • OS: Windows 8 x64, Gentoo x64 Sometimes
  • Phone: Samsung Ativ S WP8

Posted 14 November 2012 - 23:55

Could be good for single people that don't want a marriage or relationship but want a child. A single father for instance can have a child and not need to pay or find a woman to have said child for him.

#10 Original Poster

Original Poster

    Systems Developer

  • 3,009 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 08
  • Location: my room
  • OS: windows 7/8, Kali, ubuntu, OSx 10.9
  • Phone: Android

Posted 15 November 2012 - 00:13

Can't tell if serious or...

Glassed Silver:mac


im serious, dna should be spread naturally unless there was an unnatural cause as to why you cant make babies this should never be used

#11 Glassed Silver

Glassed Silver

    ☆♡Neowin's portion of Crazy♡☆

  • 10,729 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 04
  • Location: MY CATFORT in Kassel, Germany
  • OS: OS X ML; W7; Elementary; Android 4
  • Phone: iPhone 5 64GB Black (6.0.2)

Posted 15 November 2012 - 00:14

I can't give any real reason why but, this just doesn't sit well with me.
I think its a reason nature set things up the way it has. This may have implications
beyond whats foreseeable. Thats what my guts tell me.

True, but it's not always nature rejecting the possibility.

im serious, dna should be spread naturally unless there was an unnatural cause as to why you cant make babies this should never be used

Ah, I see we can agree here.

Well, I think this might be a great chance for transsexuals however, but I guess this should only ever be made possible after throughout testing.
And by throughout I mean: THROUGHOUT.

Could be good for single people that don't want a marriage or relationship but want a child. A single father for instance can have a child and not need to pay or find a woman to have said child for him.

Sounds very wrong to me, but maybe that's just me.
Mate with each other ffs...

Glassed Silver:mac

#12 tiagosilva29

tiagosilva29

    Looking for a job in Lisbon

  • 12,219 posts
  • Joined: 08-May 04

Posted 15 November 2012 - 00:15

Where's the fun in that?

#13 Glassed Silver

Glassed Silver

    ☆♡Neowin's portion of Crazy♡☆

  • 10,729 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 04
  • Location: MY CATFORT in Kassel, Germany
  • OS: OS X ML; W7; Elementary; Android 4
  • Phone: iPhone 5 64GB Black (6.0.2)

Posted 15 November 2012 - 00:18

Where's the fun in that?

A hole new dimension of masturbator toys... (typo pun intended by the way)

Glassed Silver:mac

#14 IceBreakerG

IceBreakerG

    Local Ninja! Code Ninja That Is.

  • 2,141 posts
  • Joined: 27-August 06
  • Location: Cordova, TN

Posted 15 November 2012 - 00:19

Reminds me of the "virtual sex" thing from Demolition Man.

#15 ArialBlue

ArialBlue

    var lulz;

  • 1,768 posts
  • Joined: 24-June 10
  • Location: Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • OS: Windows Master Race

Posted 15 November 2012 - 00:20

I can't give any real reason why but, this just doesn't sit well with me.
I think its a reason nature set things up the way it has. This may have implications
beyond whats foreseeable. Thats what my guts tell me.

"And thus man said unto beast that he is man and not beast" ~ a voice in my head