Roxkis, on 14 November 2012 - 23:53, said:
I can't give any real reason why but, this just doesn't sit well with me.
I think its a reason nature set things up the way it has. This may have implications
beyond whats foreseeable. Thats what my guts tell me.
True, but it's not always nature rejecting the possibility.
SPEhosting, on 15 November 2012 - 00:13, said:
im serious, dna should be spread naturally unless there was an unnatural cause as to why you cant make babies this should never be used
Ah, I see we can agree here.
Well, I think this might be a great chance for transsexuals however, but I guess this should only ever be made possible after throughout testing.
And by throughout I mean: THROUGHOUT.
Colin McGregor, on 14 November 2012 - 23:55, said:
Could be good for single people that don't want a marriage or relationship but want a child. A single father for instance can have a child and not need to pay or find a woman to have said child for him.
Sounds very wrong to me, but maybe that's just me.
Mate with each other ffs...