Jump to content



Photo

  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#16 sava700

sava700

    Super Member

  • 1,390 posts
  • Joined: 17-February 08
  • Location: Nowhere Special
  • OS: Win 7 64 bit
  • Phone: nice phone

Posted 22 November 2012 - 02:29

Bottom line here is all info should be disclosed to the buyer and in this case it wasn't regardless if it was a double murder or a flooded bathroom from the crapper stopping up.


#17 linsook

linsook

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,636 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 01

Posted 22 November 2012 - 02:32

what about the murders on the ground the house was built? don't know the likelihoods of it, but on the same ground where any house is built, as some point in time, someone could have died, been murdered, been buried etc....


thats not the issue here.

#18 Aheer.R.S.

Aheer.R.S.

    I cannot Teach Him, the Boy has no Patience!

  • 11,528 posts
  • Joined: 15-October 10

Posted 22 November 2012 - 02:33

isn't there a full disclosure clause or something when selling a house?

#19 linsook

linsook

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,636 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 01

Posted 22 November 2012 - 02:41

isn't there a full disclosure clause or something when selling a house?


for material facts. like building damage, electrical issues, liens etc... murder, suicides, deaths are in a grey area.

'material facts are defined to be those that would affect a reasonable person's decision to buy or sell'