Followers 0

mathCalculate "(2a+8b)(4a-2b)"

16 posts in this topic

Hi all,

I'm interested in becoming a pilot and was just reading some information online at a pilot programme. They give a sample entrance exam, and on it is this question (question 9):

Calculate:

(2a+8b)(4a-2b)

Is this supposed to read (2a+8b)+(4a-2b)=0, or am I missing something?

I'm not looking for the answer to this question, rather, how to calculate it; for my own knowledge.

Thanks!

Share on other sites

(2a+8b)(4a-2b)=8a^2 - 4ab + 32ab - 16b^2=8a^2 + 28ab - 16b^2

probably just to see if you know your distribution rule :)

1 person likes this

Share on other sites

It would be read as "(2a+9b)*(4a-2b)" with no absolute answer: you would be solving for one variable in terms of the other: as in "a=something b" or "b=something a"

Share on other sites

Hi all,

I'm interested in becoming a pilot and was just reading some information online at a pilot programme. They give a sample entrance exam, and on it is this question (question 9):

Is this supposed to read (2a+8b)+(4a-2b)=0, or am I missing something?

I'm not looking for the answer to this question, rather, how to calculate it; for my own knowledge.

Thanks!

6a-6b

a-b

1 person likes this

Share on other sites

Is this supposed to read (2a+8b)+(4a-2b)=0, or am I missing something?

No, I believe it means (2a+8b)x(4a-2b)=0

Since brackets () mean multiplication so its not necessary to use 'x' specifically.

Share on other sites

I was going through the exam slowly, working out each answer in my head... I just decided to scroll through it fully, and saw that the answers are at the end. It says:

8a2+28ab-16b2

So XerXis was correct.

Share on other sites

FOIL (First Outside Inside Last)

this takes me back

Share on other sites

.. its not necessary to use 'x' specifically.

Exactly. The same way that everyone knows 2b means 2xb.

a(2b) = a times 2 times b.

Share on other sites

I was going through the exam slowly, working out each answer in my head... I just decided to scroll through it fully, and saw that the answers are at the end. It says:

So XerXis was correct.

Every time I had ?'s like that in school we had to solve for each variable.... Oh well, good thing I'm not a pilot.

Share on other sites

Every time I had ?'s like that in school we had to solve for each variable.... Oh well, good thing I'm not a pilot.

That would be true if there was an equation, however it wasn't there. Also it's impossible to solve an equation with two variables. It wouldn't make any sense :)

Share on other sites

I'm a pilot and as far as I can help with that question would be to interpret it as (2a+8b)*(4a-2b). Any further than that is fairly lost on me! I don't remember my entrance exams being like that!

Share on other sites

Why is this ridiculously simple thing being posted again?

It's been solved and debated to death less than 3 months ago.

Share on other sites

Why is this ridiculously simple thing being posted again?

It's been solved and debated to death less than 3 months ago.

1) I didn't see the thread 3 months ago

2) Good luck searching the forums for a random equation

3) What's the big deal?

Good video (Y)

Create an account

Register a new account