14 posts in this topic

Posted

Good morning guys :)

So currently, i have:

AMD Athlon XP 3500 2.2GHz

MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum motherboard

ATI Radeon 9600Pro

2GB DDR1 RAM

As you can see, this system is becoming really outdated and it has done me wonders for all this time but now its become apparrent that HD videos just arent able to play on this. I have been offered as a gift for christmas some new components. So i was thinking that i could perhaps get a new CPU, RAM and Motherboard but their limit is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Processor

Motherboard

Memory

I hope it stays within the budget, as I estimated the amounts roughly.

Let me know if it isn't

Edit

PSU is fine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Many thanks PeterUK and Muhammad Farrukh. When i first was searching for some components, my first initial reaction was to get an i3 (or an i5 if that was within the budget) however, between the 2 that have been suggested, one was an AMD and the other was Intel. Which, of course the AMD is 3.8 and the i3 is 3.3 but which is the best performance out of the 2? Is the 500mhz a big bonus?

The AMD is a quad chip and the i3 is a dual core.. is that something i should consider for future proofing the processor?

Many thanks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Its even to be uneven with the two AMD with built in graphics is better and better for some/most? 4 core stuff with Intel better for all single core stuff and can be better with 2 cores over AMD 4 cores.

No one really upgrades the CPU since if you did its out of data or them CPU's are not made any more but with Intel you can swap the i3 for a i7 the AMD is max out on the CPU.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

thanks for that info peteruk

so what about the comparison between the Intel Core i5 3330 and the a10 5800k?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Since you are not that much into gaming, 5800k is a great alternative

Here is a quote from an article on 5800k, which you might find informative

In our application tests, we were surprised how similarly the A10-5800K and Core i3-3220 performed. There was little difference between them in Excel while the Core i3-3220 provided superior WinRAR performance and the A10-5800K gave superior Photoshop CS5 results. Things were also close in our encoding benches, with the A10-5800K doing a tad better in Handbrake and slightly worse in TMPGEnc 4.0 XPress.

When gaming with a beefy discrete graphics card, the results were pretty close, but for CPU-dependent titles such as Civilization V, there's a clear case to be made for Intel's processors. On the other hand, when it comes to gaming on a budget using the integrated graphics, the A10-5800K is hard to beat providing playable performance in the eight games we tested at 1280x800, whereas the Core i3-3220 really only delivered in three of those titles.

During our stress test, the A10-5800K-equipped machine consumed roughly four less watts than the system outfitted with the Llano-based A8-3850. Although the A10-5800K is more efficient than last year's APU, we found that the new chip's performance lead was roughly equal to its clock speed advantage of 31%, so Piledriver has really just made Trinity faster than Llano by enabling higher frequencies.

While on the subject of clock speeds, it's worth noting that this is a K-series model with an unlocked multiplier. With a turbo frequency that already hits 4.2GHz, we weren't sure how much higher the A10-5800K could go. Using the Prolimatech Megahalems, we were limited to 4.5GHz using 1.5v and although we were able to load Windows at 4.6GHz, it failed to pass our stability tests. The overclock amounted to 18% over the 3.8GHz base clock frequency and only 7% over the 4.2GHz boost clock rate. Unfortunately this didn't really increase performance all that much.

As we found with Llano, Trinity appears to be a bit soft on the processing horsepower side - in spite of being a quad-core part - however its integrated graphics performance is currently unmatched.

Overall, Trinity appears to iterate on the success of Llano, providing an affordable package that offers enough processing speed for most users while supplying sufficient graphics muscle for most of today's PC games on modest settings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

thanks for that info peteruk

so what about the comparison between the Intel Core i5 3330 and the a10 5800k?

Performance wise, I'd go with the Core i5. Since you don't game, either can deliver smooth HD playback. I would recommend a cheapo graphics card down the road, always best to have a dedicated GPU, even if it's not very powerful/not used for gaming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Something else you might want to check - are your hard drives / optical drives IDE or SATA? If you have IDE drives you might struggle to find a new motherboard that will take them.

AMD Athlon XP 3500 2.2GHz

ATI Radeon 9600Pro

2gigs ram

I had a very similar setup back in 2003-2007, amazed it has lasted you so long! (Y)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

haha Insanenutter, my friends have all said the same thing. Its done insanely (excuse the pun) well to be honest and its a shame to let it go. If it wasnt for HD, it prob would have lasted god knows how much longer. I use SATA drives which will be alright for future motherboards but thanks for reminding/checking with me

tsupersonic, the i5 is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

hey nexusline.. many thanks for your links. 6 cores? heres me thinking im almost at my peek at running it down to 2 choice of the i5 and the A10 however how come the cpu you have in that bundle is cheaper than the other 2 that has been suggested and how does it compare?

for some reason i can hardly see any information with regards to the i5 3330 cpu. I did however find a video comparing the fx-6100 to the i5-2500 which shows that the i5 is a higher performer but costs quite a bit more. which is true in this instance of the version too.

Im starting to slide towards the A10 due to cost and performance however im hardly a gamer. would i still benifit at all? or is really the i5 the way to go?

many thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If you are not a regular gamer, then A10 is the way to go

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

hey nexusline.. many thanks for your links. 6 cores? heres me thinking im almost at my peek at running it down to 2 choice of the i5 and the A10 however how come the cpu you have in that bundle is cheaper than the other 2 that has been suggested and how does it compare?

for some reason i can hardly see any information with regards to the i5 3330 cpu. I did however find a video comparing the fx-6100 to the i5-2500 which shows that the i5 is a higher performer but costs quite a bit more. which is true in this instance of the version too.

Im starting to slide towards the A10 due to cost and performance however im hardly a gamer. would i still benefit at all? or is really the i5 the way to go?

many thanks

You're welcome mate. I am not a PC gamer or graphics intensive user, and I don't notice any difference between an i5 & fx-6100. For the money the fx-6100 wins absolute hands down I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.