Jump to content



Photo

New smoking guns in Apollo moon hoax ?

abovetopsecret movie set white sheet

  • Please log in to reply
137 replies to this topic

#61 Obi-Wan Kenobi

Obi-Wan Kenobi

    "You were the chosen one!"

  • 2,768 posts
  • Joined: 11-November 02
  • Location: West-Central Texas

Posted 29 November 2012 - 06:43

Posted Image


#62 I am Reid

I am Reid

    Neowinian Senior

  • 4,409 posts
  • Joined: 03-November 05
  • Location: Columbus, Ohio

Posted 29 November 2012 - 07:05

I don't see why people act like you cant have more than one light source. Ive never been to the "moon", but I would bet the refection off the earth might be quite bright. Just go outside at night during a full moon and tell me that the moon isn't bright, you can see your damn shadow at night from the moon during a full moon.

#63 Obi-Wan Kenobi

Obi-Wan Kenobi

    "You were the chosen one!"

  • 2,768 posts
  • Joined: 11-November 02
  • Location: West-Central Texas

Posted 29 November 2012 - 07:37

Moon is full here right now, and OMG...you can see a brighter spot over the top of yourself than usual! SHOCK! AWE! /s

Seriously, though, it's full here...and you can see almost anything outside here that you want to....there's even a few packs of coyotes you can see with a bright enough flashlight...though, you can still see them without it. What's the point of my rambling? There is none...but I guess I'm backing up I am Reid's claim....which is true. The moon is full. ;) (on the moon, you should only have ONE light source...should be the sun, but I'm not trying to get into details here...I'm tired, and want to go to sleep.) Good night, my neowin brothers and sisters! May your imaginations run wild, like mine does....and I'm sure Hum's does.

#64 thommcg

thommcg

    Neowinian

  • 1,235 posts
  • Joined: 23-November 09

Posted 29 November 2012 - 09:49

(on the moon, you should only have ONE light source...should be the sun, but I'm not trying to get into details here...I'm tired, and want to go to sleep.)

One light source?
Posted Image

#65 redvamp128

redvamp128

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,930 posts
  • Joined: 06-October 01

Posted 29 November 2012 - 17:51

Moon is full here right now, and OMG...you can see a brighter spot over the top of yourself than usual! SHOCK! AWE! /s

Seriously, though, it's full here...and you can see almost anything outside here that you want to....there's even a few packs of coyotes you can see with a bright enough flashlight...though, you can still see them without it. What's the point of my rambling? There is none...but I guess I'm backing up I am Reid's claim....which is true. The moon is full. ;) (on the moon, you should only have ONE light source...should be the sun, but I'm not trying to get into details here...I'm tired, and want to go to sleep.) Good night, my neowin brothers and sisters! May your imaginations run wild, like mine does....and I'm sure Hum's does.



All I got say to disprove that--

Posted Image

#66 redvamp128

redvamp128

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,930 posts
  • Joined: 06-October 01

Posted 29 November 2012 - 17:52

Double post---

#67 mradam

mradam

    Neowinian

  • 3 posts
  • Joined: 27-August 13

Posted 27 August 2013 - 02:34

The identical backgrounds argument is nonsense, since the photographs don't actually have identical backgrounds.

 

Look at the intersection of a more distant mountain to a closer one.  It's clear that the second photograph is taken some distance to the right of the first photograph.

 

From this piece of crap: http://www.debunking...m#_Toc344913268

 

 

 

Attached Images

  • Back1.jpg
  • Back2.jpg


#68 The_Observer

The_Observer

    Apples, Bananas, Rhinoceros!

  • 3,986 posts
  • Joined: 12-April 05
  • Location: New Zealand
  • OS: OS X 10.9
  • Phone: iPhone5s

Posted 27 August 2013 - 02:47

I would like to call BS, but that's because I have faith that in this day and age, we have telescopes that can see the moon in very high detail, I'm sure someone could spend the time scanning the lunar surface and find the Flag, abandoned Rover, old Modules etc...

Edit

Lol the sun was a giant light bulb,
it technically still is a giant lightbulb :p

 

Even if this happened, people could call BS on those photos too. Look save up some money and get up there yourself. Why not start a kickstarter fund to build a rocket to go to the moon and prove it yourself.



#69 mradam

mradam

    Neowinian

  • 3 posts
  • Joined: 27-August 13

Posted 27 August 2013 - 02:52

The shadow side argument is also crap.  Of course the shadowed side of an astronaut on the moon should be somewhat lit.  He's standing on a giant reflector extending for miles in every direction, all of it brightly lit by the sun.

 

Look at his visor!  You can see what's being reflected right there in the visor.  The suits are white for the purpose of being as reflective as possible.  Think of a white car vs. a black car on a sunny day here on Earth.  The white car doesn't get nearly as hot because the white color reflects more radiation (including visible light) away instead of absorbing it, giving the appearance of white, and the cooler temperature.  Whiteness and reflectivity of the suit help keep the astronaut cool.

 

From this steaming pile: http://www.debunking...m#_Toc344913262

 

 

Attached Images

  • Shadow1.jpg


#70 McKay

McKay

    Neowinian Stallion

  • 6,021 posts
  • Joined: 29-August 10
  • Location: 308 Negra Arroyo Lane
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Xperia Z3

Posted 27 August 2013 - 02:55

We went to the moon. There are satellite pictures that show the American flag still standing up along with the what's left of the lunar orbiters.
http://www.abc.net.a...tanding/4166604

 

But by now the flag will have been bleached white by the Sun, any Aliens will think France were the first to visit the Moon.  :rofl:

 

For me the biggest proof that America DID land on the Moon was the Soviet Union, they would have been tracking that thing all the way to the Moon to prove it went there, you think the USSR wouldn't have jumped at a chance to show the World that the Americans faked it.



#71 Dot Matrix

Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Senior

  • 11,500 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: Upstate New York
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 27 August 2013 - 03:00

(on the moon, you should only have ONE light source...should be the sun, but I'm not trying to get into details here...I'm tired, and want to go to sleep.) Good night, my neowin brothers and sisters! May your imaginations run wild, like mine does....and I'm sure Hum's does.

The Earth reflects back light to the moon, just as similarly as the moon reflects back light to Earth. The sun isn't the only source of light in space.



#72 spenser.d

spenser.d

    Neowinian Senior

  • 11,076 posts
  • Joined: 19-December 03

Posted 27 August 2013 - 03:00


Very interesting topic, Hum, especially for the opened minded! Love stuff like this! Leads you to a kind of "come to your own conclusion" type of story, if you will. Good read! thumbs_up.gif


There's a rather large difference between things you can come to your own conclusion about and just making up facts. That we landed on the moon is not something you get to come to your own conclusion about.

#73 freak180

freak180

    Mr. GreatDisaster

  • 2,328 posts
  • Joined: 02-December 08
  • Location: Philadelphia, PA
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro 64-bit

Posted 27 August 2013 - 03:02

Good read!



#74 mradam

mradam

    Neowinian

  • 3 posts
  • Joined: 27-August 13

Posted 27 August 2013 - 03:15

The non-parallel shadow argument is nonsense, too (like all hoax evidence).

 

Although the topography (hills, valleys) of the lunar surface can make the shadows to appear not parallel, as well as lengthen and shorten them, the effect is mostly due to perspective.  Simply put, a 3-dimensional scene has the property that objects and distances further away from the camera appear SMALLER than objects and distances close up.  The same holds true for shadows and distances between shadows.

 

If you stand on railway tracks and look one direction, the rails (which are definitely parallel) will appear to converge in the distance.  The distance between the rails appears to shrink as the rails get further away.

 

From this 5-coil steamer: http://www.debunking...m#_Toc344913261

Images of this effect on Earth follow.  Google Images for "nonparallel shadows" to see more.

 

 

 

Attached Images

  • Parallel5.jpg
  • Palallel2.jpg
  • Parallel1.jpg
  • Parallel3.jpg
  • Parallel4.jpg
  • Parallel6.jpg


#75 Dot Matrix

Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Senior

  • 11,500 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: Upstate New York
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 27 August 2013 - 03:16

I can't believe people still believe this crap...

 

SAVE US PHIL PLAIT! http://www.badastron.../foxapollo.html