46 replies to this topic

[HawkMan]

SPEhosting, on 04 December 2012 - 16:49, said:

no ? lol if she distributed them then i would say yes... but dont think you can really sexually exploit your self

Actually you can get charged with making child pornography by taking your own pictures. American laws...

[+Asik]

Quote

If convicted on the child exploitation charge, Rusk could face six to 20 years in prison.

I understand it's wrong, but six to twenty years in prison? That's about the same penalty as for homicide to various degrees. What's really sick IMO is the level of paranoïa and irrationalism regarding minors and sexuality. On the one hand they have sex in primary school today and no one seems to mind, but own a picture of a 17-year old tit and you're judged essentially as a murderer.

[logicwin]

is it not possible she uploaded all the photos on the phone in mass and ended up uploading that one without realizing? if she didnt know her daughter had the picture on there

[Colin McGregor]

SPEhosting, on 04 December 2012 - 17:03, said:

how so ? didnt she just have them on her phone and they got taken off her ? and her mother uploaded them isnt her mother the one who stole and distributed them? I might be missing something from the article but yes taking advantage of the laws as a kids is great when I was in high school I used to run a website which posted laws and what they meant teachers cannot do and what the kids can do! I read through the whole human rights act ....I was one of those kids! mwahaha

ya she took nude photos of herself to look at later. She didn't take them with the intentions to send them to someone.

[Dashel]

While I don't care for her action, I really hope she beats the charges. I'd happily donate to that defense fund, though I bet it never gets that far. The exploitation and pornography charges are just ridiculous, sounds more like this Pinkard pig is just a meddlesome ass looking for some limelight.

Oh, don't worry Pinky, I'll be sure to report any illegal activity on FB pronto. /s

[LaP]

HawkMan, on 04 December 2012 - 22:40, said:

Actually you can get charged with making child pornography by taking your own pictures. American laws...

Seriously ? that is stupid.

[ArialBlue]

LaP, on 04 December 2012 - 23:31, said:

Seriously ? that is stupid.

Laws do not take in account modern day technology and boyfriends and stuff it seems.

[Colin McGregor]

ArialBlue, on 04 December 2012 - 23:43, said:

Laws do not take in account modern day technology and boyfriends and stuff it seems.

no it don't. I remember watching something on tv where a 14 yr old boy and girl were dating. She sent a pic of her boobs to him and hes now on the registered sex offenders list for life.

[neufuse]

Colin McGregor, on 04 December 2012 - 23:49, said:

no it don't. I remember watching something on tv where a 14 yr old boy and girl were dating. She sent a pic of her boobs to him and hes now on the registered sex offenders list for life.

and the worst thing, if she sent the pic to him without him asking, he's still in trouble! talk about a way to set someone up!

[Growled]

This is wrong on may levels.

[compl3x]

Colin McGregor, on 04 December 2012 - 16:05, said:

then the girl is just as stupid as the mom. After all the leak photos going on in the world what kind of brain dead girl leaves nude photos on their phone.

Yes. A stupid mistake by a teenager is exactly the same as an adult, a the mother, no less, posting those photots. derp.

[Dashel]

Her mother...

[Shane Nokes]

Someone had to say it...

Pics or it didn't happen...

[LaP]

Shane Nokes, on 06 December 2012 - 23:32, said:

Someone had to say it...

Pics or it didn't happen...

Well the pic is illegal XD just downloading it in the cache of your computer without watching it will cost you 50 years of your life.

[Growled]

LaP, on 07 December 2012 - 00:43, said:

Well the pic is illegal XD just downloading it in the cache of your computer without watching it will cost you 50 years of your life.

It stops me but I doubt that stops many people.