Followers 0

# Flipping a coin may not be an even bet after all

## 23 posts in this topic

YOU don't need to be a mathematician or a Vegas card shark to know that, when all things are equal, the probability of flipping a coin and guessing which side lands up correctly is 50-50.

But what most people seem to forget, or so says Stanford math professor Persi Diaconis, is that things are almost never equal.

In reality, the odds of guessing heads or tails correctly aren't as even as you might think, and the reason has much more to do with physics than probability.

According to Prof Diaconis, a natural bias occurs when coins are flipped, which results in the side that was originally facing up returning to that same position 51 per cent of the time.

This means that if a coin is flipped with its heads side facing up, it will land the same way 51 out of 100 times.

Prof Diaconis came to this conclusion after determining that no matter how hard a coin is flipped, the side that started up will spend more time facing up.

One way of thinking about this, as noted in an article from Coding Wheel, is to look at the ratio of even and odd numbers starting from one. What you'll discover is that no matter what number you stop at, there will never be more even numbers than odd numbers in that sequence. The coin flips work in much the same way.

Prof Diaconis first realised that coin flips were not random after he and his colleagues managed to rig a coin-flipping machine to get a coin to land heads every time.

He and his team then asked human subjects do the same thing over and over, recording the results with a high-speed camera. Though the results were a little more random, they still ended up with the 51-49 per cent margin.

Prof Diaconis noted that the randomness is attributed to the fact that when humans flip coins, there are a number of different motions the coin is likely to make.

For instance, he showed how coins don't just move end to end, but also in a circular motion, like a tossed pizza.

He also found that there are ways to flip a coin where it looks like it is tumbling in the air, but in reality, it doesn't move at all.

Prof Diaconis proved this by tying a ribbon to a coin and showing how in four out of 10 times the ribbon would remain flat after the coin was caught.

While the margin is relatively small, it's enough to maybe get you reconsidering using a coin toss to settle your next argument.

In another startling discovery, Prof Diaconis determined that the probability of guessing which side comes up of a spinning copper-plated penny is also skewed more in one direction.

According to Prof Diaconis' research, a spinning penny will land tails side up roughly 80 per cent of the time.

source

##### Share on other sites

Interesting thoughts and it was somewhat reasonable until the last sentence:

According to Prof Diaconis' research, a spinning penny will land tails side up roughly 80 per cent of the time.

There's no way in hell that's remotely true.

1 person likes this

##### Share on other sites

I read this a while back, pretty cool.

##### Share on other sites
There's no way in hell that's remotely true.

Why not?

(That's a genuine question, I'm asking if you have the science to back it up or if you just don't believe it to be true).

##### Share on other sites

i tried it one time and it was tails. so 100%. no biggie.

Interesting thoughts and it was somewhat reasonable until the last sentence:

There's no way in hell that's remotely true.

##### Share on other sites

According to Prof Diaconis' research, a spinning penny will land tails side up roughly 80 per cent of the time.

source

Now is that true for all pennies ? Steel, high copper of olden days, and the 95% zinc ones ? :laugh:

Why not?

(That's a genuine question, I'm asking if you have the science to back it up or if you just don't believe it to be true).

You know how it is with the instant experts on Neowin. Seldom do they have reasons. ;)

3 people like this

##### Share on other sites

Why not?

(That's a genuine question, I'm asking if you have the science to back it up or if you just don't believe it to be true).

Sure, I could test it myself if I wanted. So could you. Even if I flipped a penny 1000 times, I can guarantee it will come nowhere close to 80% in favor of tails. I could maybe believe that a penny might have an uneven weight distribution giving tails an advantage, but thinking it has that huge of an advantage isn't even logical.

##### Share on other sites

Sure, I could test it myself if I wanted. So could you. Even if I flipped a penny 1000 times, I can guarantee it will come nowhere close to 80% in favor of tails. I could maybe believe that a penny might have an uneven weight distribution giving tails an advantage, but thinking it has that huge of an advantage isn't even logical.

Spin, not flip.

I imagine it is off center because the head protrudes ever so slightly more than the backside.

##### Share on other sites

You know how it is with the instant experts on Neowin. Seldom do they have reasons. ;)

Pretty quick to the gun on that assumption, don't you think? Are we not allowed time to back up our stance?

Spin, not flip.

I imagine it is off center because the head protrudes ever so slightly more than the backside.

Ooo, good call. I misread the "spinning" part. I guess in that case, the center of gravity offset would have a greater effect and the environment lesser an effect. Though 80%-20% still seems rather extreme.

##### Share on other sites

This means that if a coin is flipped with its heads side facing up, it will land the same way 51 out of 100 times.

Statement is grossly wrong... Such a bad statement it was hard to continue reading the article... The probability of this actually happening (51/100 with those odds) is actually extremely low.

##### Share on other sites

There's a reason why, in sports, they let the coin fall to the ground.

##### Share on other sites

There's a reason why, in sports, they let the coin fall to the ground.

I don't follow your logic. Is it to allow the ground to add an extra variable?

##### Share on other sites

I don't follow your logic. Is it to allow the ground to add an extra variable?

Yep. The more variables, the more random the odds.

##### Share on other sites

well then.... lets throw a bit of schrodinger's cat in to this ... hide the coin before the flip! therefore the coin is both starting on heads and on tails! making it 51% chance it will land on either side ... 102% in total ... mind blown lets go home ..this post was pointless but gives you something to think about!

2 people like this

##### Share on other sites

I don't follow your logic. Is it to allow the ground to add an extra variable?

Yeah, turf bounce. Someone flipping a coin can either flip it a set number of times, making it land in their hand one way or the other (not hard, if you practice, also made easier by those giant novelty coins they often use in sports), or catch it at the correct time to have it land one way (not hard if you have excellent eyesight), or rotate it after catching it (just plain old cheating).

If you toss it into the air and let it hit the ground, though, you can't account for how it will bounce, making it uncontrolled enough.

##### Share on other sites
In reality, the odds of guessing heads or tails correctly aren't as even as you might think, and the reason has much more to do with physics than probability.

It's also how you flip it. I can make it flip whatever way I want it too.

##### Share on other sites

nothing is more random than srand(time(null));

##### Share on other sites

Coincidence does not exist people.

Everything is determined, stop kidding yourselves.

The only problem is, we don't always know all the factors of an equation to get the result and hence look into the future.

Glassed Silver:mac

##### Share on other sites

nothing is more random than srand(time(null));

##### Share on other sites

nothing is more random than srand(time(null));

That's like saying someone is more pregnant than another pregnant person (as my former biology teacher would put it)...

Randomness is something that's either TRUE or FALSE.

As genuine randomness does not exist, it's always false (0) and 0 cannot be more than 0.

I do see how it may be quite good in terms of scrambling the guessability of the result.

Glassed Silver:mac

##### Share on other sites

The study is BS, or at least the conclusion doesn't apply to toast.

##### Share on other sites

Flipping a coin isn't an even bet either if the person flipping the coin knows how to flip it properly and account for initial position and time spent in air.

For some reason or other I can account for the above-mentioned while flipping a quarter and make it come up heads almost every single time. I'm not sure if it has something to do with observation or the difference in weight on one side vs another...but I can do it...

Then again I can also toss playing cards with a strange level of accuracy as well.

##### Share on other sites

Coincidence does not exist people.

Everything is determined, stop kidding yourselves.

The only problem is, we don't always know all the factors of an equation to get the result and hence look into the future.

Glassed Silver:mac

No, nothing is determined, but everything is possible.

## Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

## Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account