Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Windows 93 Is Real, and It's Spectacular||
|Hubble Shows Mirror, Mirror, Mirror, Mirror of an Ancient Supernova||
|Valve on Half Life 3 in VR: "We're not saying no"||
|Official Opera Weekly Builds Thread||
|Your thoughts on VR headsets?||
Posted 13 December 2012 - 22:31
The only difference for gaming is full support for DirectX11.1. Some features will be made available for Windows 7 with a platform update (see here). At the moment, no games support it so it isn't worth upgrading to Windows 8 only for DX11.1.
Posted 13 December 2012 - 22:32
Except in AC3, 8 offers smoother gameplay for the 7950 in pretty much everything they tested.
Trouble is, that doesn't really matter. A moral victory in the borderline-meaningless FPS sweeps doesn't overcome the fact that the Radeon HD 7950 has a persistent problem with high-latency frames across a range of test scenarios based on the latest games. The 99th-percentile frame times reflect that reality. Our latest round of tests shows that Windows 8 is not the problem. On the contrary, Windows 8 generally improves the latency picture somewhat.
Posted 13 December 2012 - 22:38
Eh? Been a long time since I used windows but back when I did (xp/7) I never really remember many game crashes at all.
Games simply crash less (far less) on Windows 8 than on earlier versions of Windows - even games that predate Windows 8 by several years.
Posted 13 December 2012 - 22:42
Posted 13 December 2012 - 23:04
Posted 13 December 2012 - 23:32
Posted 14 December 2012 - 01:29
Posted 14 December 2012 - 01:51
Posted 14 December 2012 - 02:06
Posted 14 December 2012 - 13:21
Posted 14 December 2012 - 13:42
Posted 14 December 2012 - 13:47
So basically it's just a matter of preference to have Windows 8 installed instead of Windows 7 on a gaming rig
(performance-wise is Win 8 slightly faster I guess)
Posted 18 December 2012 - 17:10
Posted 22 December 2012 - 22:36