Jump to content



Photo

Forbes: Microsoft Is Fast Turning Into A Sideshow


  • Please log in to reply
168 replies to this topic

#31 Draconian Guppy

Draconian Guppy

    LippyZillaD Council

  • 15,871 posts
  • Joined: 22-August 04
  • Location: Neowin

Posted 05 January 2013 - 16:23

Off-Topic: The amount of people spelling Lumia as Lumina is astonishing.

I... Love you...
Seriously... Damn I thought I was the only one noticing :p

On topic, man it's surprising how hard it is for some people to understand, the easiest thing to do, is give your opinion. Yet they grumble and argue about exactly that! Opinions!



o·pin·ion
/əˈpinyən/NounA view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
The beliefs or views of a large number or majority of people about a particular thing.


Synonymsview - judgement - judgment - mind - no
tion - idea


#32 vcfan

vcfan

    Straight Ballin'

  • 5,350 posts
  • Joined: 12-June 11

Posted 05 January 2013 - 16:26

apple fanboy writing anti MS article. what else is new? really,this is starting to get OLD. You would have the same articles even if Microsoft sold 100 million licenses in the first month. These people never go away.

You can always tell when Microsoft is doing good when these sites keep hammering article after article about Microsoft.

Sorry guys,the market doesn't agree with you.

#33 Luis Mazza

Luis Mazza

    Neowinian

  • 1,733 posts
  • Joined: 11-January 09
  • Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil

Posted 05 January 2013 - 16:48

Fanboys are in denial.

Then comes acceptance. But if you, fanboy, wants to stop this cycle, why don't you show your history of Microsoft fanboyism and send those WITH CRITICS to Steve Ballmer?

The problem is... you agree with what's being done. That's why you'll never be a CEO of anything other than a grocery store and that's why he must leave Microsoft if he loves the company more than his own proud.

We all want Microsoft to succeed... But denying it's huge problems, as the ones listed in Forbe's article, won't help AT ALL.

#34 HawkMan

HawkMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • 22,215 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway
  • Phone: Noka Lumia 1020

Posted 05 January 2013 - 16:53

I... Love you...
Seriously... Damn I thought I was the only one noticing :p

On topic, man it's surprising how hard it is for some people to understand, the easiest thing to do, is give your opinion. Yet they grumble and argue about exactly that! Opinions!



o·pin·ion
/əˈpinyən/NounA view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
The beliefs or views of a large number or majority of people about a particular thing.


Synonymsview - judgement - judgment - mind - no
tion - idea


I stopped caring months ago. I realized it was hopeless.

#35 Dot Matrix

Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Senior

  • 11,713 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: Upstate New York
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:02

Fanboys are in denial.

Then comes acceptance. But if you, fanboy, wants to stop this cycle, why don't you show your history of Microsoft fanboyism and send those WITH CRITICS to Steve Ballmer?

The problem is... you agree with what's being done. That's why you'll never be a CEO of anything other than a grocery store and that's why he must leave Microsoft if he loves the company more than his own proud.

We all want Microsoft to succeed... But denying it's huge problems, as the ones listed in Forbe's article, won't help AT ALL.


There's very little problems with Windows 8. Most are minor and don't prohibit user productivity. The new Metro additions are not problems, and set Windows and the rest of Microsoft's ecosystem up for an excellent next couple of years.

#36 Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 63,500 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:05

... Windows 8 is very consumer focused and not really business friendly with the changes implemented.

Consumers expect a fluid experience with their products ... Microsoft need something compelling there as well, they don't have that.

... it just doesn't seem to make it into consumer products at the rate it really should.


Maybe Microsoft should bring in the consumers to design Windows 9. ;)

#37 Luis Mazza

Luis Mazza

    Neowinian

  • 1,733 posts
  • Joined: 11-January 09
  • Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:08

There's very little problems with Windows 8. Most are minor and don't prohibit user productivity. The new Metro additions are not problems, and set Windows and the rest of Microsoft's ecosystem up for an excellent next couple of years.


Sure, Mr.
That's exactly what you and them are hoping for.


Unfortunately, your denial will survive even if MS does fail. But failing is subjective, as the company won't die... as your denial won't die either.

#38 francescob

francescob

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,345 posts
  • Joined: 04-November 08

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:19

I think that if Microsoft hadn't forced Metro on Windows 8 (but on touchscreen computers it would have been perfect) it would have been the best Windows release ever. They did an astonishing amount of change to the shell interface (new task manager, new explorer file manager, new file copying system, etc.) and despite that it uses almost 30% less RAM, no previous Windows operating systems improved performance/user interface like that, not to mention it also runs on another architecture as well. I like Metro but with a mouse, a touchpad or especially when you're used to use only the keyboard it can be quite annoying, it runs perfectly on touchscreens though.

#39 Dot Matrix

Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Senior

  • 11,713 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: Upstate New York
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:24

Sure, Mr.
That's exactly what you and them are hoping for.


Unfortunately, your denial will survive even if MS does fail. But failing is subjective, as the company won't die... as your denial won't die either.


Denial of what? Windows 8 is a little rough around the edges, but it's still a great OS. Metro isn't going away.

#40 +LogicalApex

LogicalApex

    Software Engineer

  • 6,507 posts
  • Joined: 14-August 02
  • Location: Philadelphia, PA
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64
  • Phone: Nexus 5

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:25

I think that if Microsoft hadn't forced Metro on Windows 8 (but on touchscreen computers it would have been perfect) it would have been the best Windows release ever. They did an astonishing amount of change to the shell interface (new task manager, new explorer file manager, new file copying system, etc.) and despite that it uses almost 30% less RAM, no previous Windows operating systems improved performance/user interface like that, not to mention it also runs on another architecture as well. I like Metro but with a mouse, a touchpad or especially when you're used to use only the keyboard it can be quite annoying, it runs perfectly on touchscreens though.


Exactly. It is bone headed decisions like this that the Forbes article is getting at.

#41 Azies

Azies

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,870 posts
  • Joined: 19-January 10

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:26

LoL When Microsoft and Neowin Fanboys are faced with criticism they discredit the author and organization in order to make themselves look like the right in the situation, tool bags.

#42 mzta cody

mzta cody

    Neowinian

  • 397 posts
  • Joined: 24-April 09

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:35

There's very little problems with Windows 8.

Opinion.

Most are minor and don't prohibit user productivity.

Opinion.

The new Metro additions are not problems, and set Windows and the rest of Microsoft's ecosystem up for an excellent next couple of years.

Opinion.

The thing for me that elicits the most head-scratching: Why are some people so emotionally invested in a product that unending insistence on its being successful becomes a never-ending crusade? This goes a bit above and beyond mere "fanoboyism", and it's actually bizarrre and almost disturbing. This is usually the dogged defense parents reserve for their flesh-and-blood offspring, not for software products.
I mean, who really cares if some are perceived to be "hating" on MS? Is MS paying you for this (wasted) effort/ time?

#43 gadean

gadean

    dreaming..

  • 1,661 posts
  • Joined: 04-July 02

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:39

Still, purchasing 70 some MILLION dollars worth of licenses? You bet they'll be deploying it. My point still stands.


I don't think you understand how software assurance works. The government is purchasing seats which come with licenses that include various products. One of the options is Windows 8 and Office 2013. But that doesn't mean it will necessarily be used. Same thing happened with Vista - the government had the licenses for it through software assurance but it was, for the most part, left unused.

#44 Luis Mazza

Luis Mazza

    Neowinian

  • 1,733 posts
  • Joined: 11-January 09
  • Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:40

Denial of what? Windows 8 is a little rough around the edges, but it's still a great OS. Metro isn't going away.


It's ugly and confusing and not made to be used by a mouse. That is enough of a total failure and sales are bad and will prove that even further.

Like it or not, sales are BAD for what Microsoft is used to. Also, they don't seem to have an outlook for improvement.

Regarding the mobile experience: it is also ugly and confusing. About the name: nobody can stand the name WINDOWS for another 20 years. That is also another huge problem that is often ignored by Microsoft.

#45 francescob

francescob

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,345 posts
  • Joined: 04-November 08

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:42

Metro was an huge bet, had Microsoft not forced it for every users the manufacturers and software developers wouldn't have taken it seriously. Had Metro not being forced for all users the number of applications for it would be extremely low and Microsoft would have had an extremely difficult time transitioning to touch computing (tablets, convertibles, etc.).

Personal computers manufacturers have, for decades, proved to be extremely incompetent, selling all sort of crippled hardware (laptops with touchpads with all different sort of incoherent features, keyboard with function keys in the weirdest places (my last HP laptop has the function keys as normal keys under the ESC button, what the hell were they thinking?), super-expensive processors with extremely poor cooling or paired with an insanely low amount of ram or horribly slow hard drives, random proprietary devices with crashy untested drivers, etc.) because they know the average users rarely looks deeply into the specs, the only improvements we had were with every requirement enforced by Microsoft. Metro unfortunately is one of those, Microsoft will lose the bet only if touch-computing will end up being a fad (which I doubt will ever happen, with smartphones and touchscreens on everything nowadays) but they couldn't have done anything else. Had Metro not been mandatory they could have risked ended up crushed in the touch computing market due to the very small amount of applications (the Windows Store basically subsidizes part of the Windows license cost letting manufacturers selling hardware at cheaper prices).