Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|The Big Wrestling Thread!||
|The Kojima Rumors Are True, Says Metal Gear Singer||
|How do I convert .FLA to .SWF with actionscript 3 code intact?||
|Mayweather vs Pacquiao: Fight is officially on for May 2||
Posted 17 January 2013 - 05:38
Posted 17 January 2013 - 05:52
For some reason the only client that works best for me is uTorrent. I get good connections to peers and the download speed is good.
I have tried Transmission, Deluge, Vuze, qBitorrent and none of them even come close to the transfer speeds as uTorrent. Maybe I have configured something wrong...
Posted 17 January 2013 - 05:59
my only problem with qbittorrent was the WebUI is very buggy (doesn't like to render fully). as i use the webui quite a bit that in itself is enough to turn me away from it
qbitorrent works just as fast as utorrent for me, I can always max my bandwidth on a well seeded torrents. it supports all the bittorrent features utorrent does too (utp etc...)
Posted 17 January 2013 - 08:22
The UK uses Celsius too, you silly Viking
And the United Kingdom location setting provides measurements in Metric: https://dl.dropbox.c...tricsetting.png
I didn't know that the network molestation was a uTorrent thing... I might have to try alternatives because I have noticed that.
Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:15
Im probably the only one still using eMule and kad lol
Nope, you are NOT alone.
And you can't forget good old Direct Connect (client: DC++).
Posted 11 July 2013 - 09:13
qTorrent is a great alternative if uTorrent starts developing bugs that affects your usage in the current builds. I tend to find myself switching from uTorrent to qTorrent / visa-versa every 3-6 months (mostly due to web interface or CPU usage issues).
Posted 16 July 2013 - 22:52
Yes, i am looking for alternatives as well, but i do like utorrent (when it works) anyway, i was banned at forum.torrent.com for posting a question in 2 relevant threads; i think they didnt like the question;
my question was;
what is the most recent stable utorrent build that respects the upload limit?
i know 3.1 worked for me; but i didnt want to deinstall/install 20 different builds between 3.1 and 3.3.1 to figure it out. i was hoping maybe someone did this already and could give the answer straight off.
Posted 16 July 2013 - 23:29
2.2.1 seems to be the best, at least IMHO. Last of the versions that went to complete garbage.
thanks for your reply.
yes, i like that one as well, but i noticed with that 2.2 the DHT doesnt seem to work as well than it does with these 3.0 builds;
and DHT is where i find most peers when looking up older torrents.
smaller memory footprint with less garbage.
and compared to what i see in your signatures; you gentlemen have spacestations, and i have an amstrad 386sx25mhz
Posted 16 July 2013 - 23:46
I've been torrent hopping between clients lately
On Windows I prefer Deluge
OS X and *nix, Transmission