Jump to content



Photo

Mother defends kids, shoots intruder


  • Please log in to reply
223 replies to this topic

#76 tiagosilva29

tiagosilva29

    Looking for a job in Lisbon

  • 12,219 posts
  • Joined: 08-May 04

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:17

Doesn't seem to be working for Chicago.

Nothing works in Chicago. Not even the Bears.

Posted Image


#77 ew2x4

ew2x4

    Neowinian

  • 669 posts
  • Joined: 01-May 05
  • Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:20

So then why did this criminal, who doesn't follow the law, not have a gun?


This is a horrible argument. Embarrassment to simple deduction, really.

You want a equal way to defend yourself? Then, this woman should go to jail. The criminal only had a crowbar. Don't need a gun to defend against that. Another crowbar would be just as effective right?


Again, this is completely flawed logic. Was she supposed to stop and ask the gentleman if he was armed with anything other than a crowbar? There should be nothing equal about defending you and your family from criminals. Besides, what is more humane: beating someone to death with a crow bar or shooting someone?

Do people that criticize this woman have a wife and/or kids? I'm guessing no.

#78 OP DocM

DocM

    Neowinian Senior

  • 18,099 posts
  • Joined: 31-July 10
  • Location: Michigan

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:23

....Yes, the gun possibly saved this families life THIS time and I am very happy for them. However, in the end, guns still take more lives than they save.


You have the ratios back-asswards. FBI estimates 1.5 million defensive uses of a firearm per year, some independent researchers say 2-2.5 million, counting the vast majority where they are NOT fired. That dwarfs the number of unjustified gun homicides - 60% of which are suicides

#79 shakey

shakey

    It's soooooo Educational

  • 11,021 posts
  • Joined: 31-March 04
  • Location: Austin, Tx

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:24

This is a horrible argument. Embarrassment to simple deduction, really.



Again, this is completely flawed logic. Was she supposed to stop and ask the gentleman if he was armed with anything other than a crowbar? There should be nothing equal about defending you and your family from criminals.

Do people that criticize this woman have a wife and/or kids? I'm guessing no.


LOL - Thanks for showing how the answers to the progunwanters questions are stupid. I agree, all the questions and ways progunners come off would only result in stupid things. Hence why I have brought many actual good questions to this. I still haven't found anything other than opinoin based "facts" as rebuttal. My logic isn't the flawed one here. It's those who want to ignore what other 1st world nations have done, and say that somehow, America is completely different.

#80 Rohdekill

Rohdekill

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,597 posts
  • Joined: 06-July 05
  • Location: Earth

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:25

5 shots in the face is self defence?

Doesn't even say that she warned him or told him to get out, he broke in and was instantly faced with a weapon and she fired all the rounds off.

Can't wait to see how this is spinned into something positive.


It is EXTREMELY common for anyone in a panic situation to empty their clip and think they have fired only once or twice. Even trained officers encounter this. In fact, it is for this very reason why the military went with burst shots (3 rounds per trigger pull). It was found, during vietnam that soldiers would panic upon a blitz attack and empty the magazine by holding the trigger when issued fully automatic weapons.

I've got to hand it to the woman...even at close range, a panic shooting typically results in more missed rounds than hits.

#81 shakey

shakey

    It's soooooo Educational

  • 11,021 posts
  • Joined: 31-March 04
  • Location: Austin, Tx

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:26

You have the ratios back-asswards. FBI estimates 1.5 million defensive uses of a firearm per year, some independent researchers say 2-2.5 million, counting the vast majority where they are NOT fired. That dwarfs the number of unjustified gun homicides - 60% of which are suicides


Lets not quote studies done back in 1993.

http://www.gunsandcr...rg/dgufreq.html - proof of my claim.

It's pretty bad, when Cracked.com can prove you wrong....

http://www.cracked.c...st-gun-control/

#82 macrosslover

macrosslover

    Muad’Dib

  • 3,115 posts
  • Joined: 13-August 02
  • Location: Atlanta, GA
  • OS: Windows 7

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:33

Hard to make something work for a whole nation when you only pick 1 little city. It's got to be a nation wide thing. Can't make it so they just have to cross a border that isn't even checked or secure.

The fact is, you don't know it. It hasn't been done. So please, don't say something is fact when actually, it's an opinion based off of something that doesn't even aim at solving the problem.

If you think that just because its been around too long is a reason to keep it, that's stupid. Really stupid..... so I'd like to direct you to my sig.

Guns aren't a exclusive thing to America. If it was really all that bad, why don't the nations that have regulations on them, have a big problem with illegal gun use? Oh thats right, they don't. Unless you think Americans are all a bunch of savages , or are just surrounded by savages, I see no reason why we can't follow in the steps of all the other 1st world nations. We have proof it works in other nations, all it takes is trying something. Too many ******* in America though it seems... cats that is.


Chicago isn't exactly a little city and even if you do a nationwide ban, there's always Mexico, have to ban guns there too. If somebody really wanted to get a gun they'd find a way in America. And I didn't say since guns have been around so long we should keep them just because, I said that because of that fact it would make them that much harder to get rid of.

#83 Lord Method Man

Lord Method Man

    Banned

  • 3,758 posts
  • Joined: 18-September 12

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:39

Good shooting on the mother's part. First I've read about this :)

#84 linsook

linsook

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,640 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 01

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:45

Chicago isn't exactly a little city and even if you do a nationwide ban, there's always Mexico, have to ban guns there too. If somebody really wanted to get a gun they'd find a way in America. And I didn't say since guns have been around so long we should keep them just because, I said that because of that fact it would make them that much harder to get rid of.


i think the bulk of guns that mexicans gets are mainly smuggled in from, you got it, usa. so guns and money flow into mexico and drugs flow the other way.

#85 spenser.d

spenser.d

    Neowinian Senior

  • 11,014 posts
  • Joined: 19-December 03

Posted 05 January 2013 - 17:51

Miniscule? It actually happens all the time. The people who feed you that propaganda never tell you about it. On top of that they like to mix in justifiable homicides (in self defense) with criminal homicides to skew the numbers further. Here's some examples for you.



These incidents alone support my argument and prove that it is the truth.


edit:
@McKay: if you are going to quote me out of context in an effort to skew what I've said, then you don't even deserve a reply because you have no credibility.


That's 7 examples over a 15 year timeframe. Do you know how many people were killed needlessly by guns in the US in that timeframe? Tens of thousands. The amount of times people are able to defend themselves is extremely miniscule in comparison.

#86 Biotoxic_hazard_835

Biotoxic_hazard_835

    Neowinian Medic

  • 2,698 posts
  • Joined: 22-January 07
  • Location: Bayamon, Puerto Rico

Posted 05 January 2013 - 18:04

5 shots in the face is self defence?

Doesn't even say that she warned him or told him to get out, he broke in and was instantly faced with a weapon and she fired all the rounds off.

Can't wait to see how this is spinned into something positive.


Are you trying to start a flame war ? Cause your comment point on that direction. When a person enters your house by force and with a crowbar in his hand you can be sure he is not selling Girls Scout cookies, he comes to harm you and your family and you have every right to blow the living crap out of him. Maybe, just maybe you should think twice what you're going to post before posting something that can make you look like a troll or that is plain nonsense.

#87 Lamp0

Lamp0

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,766 posts
  • Joined: 14-December 08

Posted 05 January 2013 - 18:40

Are you trying to start a flame war ? Cause your comment point on that direction. When a person enters your house by force and with a crowbar in his hand you can be sure he is not selling Girls Scout cookies, he comes to harm you and your family and you have every right to blow the living crap out of him. Maybe, just maybe you should think twice what you're going to post before posting something that can make you look like a troll or that is plain nonsense.


Just because you have the right to do something doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. I am not saying the woman did the wrong thing here, but surely you can understand that someone might question as to why she didn't shout a warning rather than wait for him to come upstairs. I mean, obviously she was scared & most probably in a panic.

I am not being sympathetic to the criminal at all. I am sympathetic to the women, I can only imagine a home invasion is undoubtedly an horrific ordeal & having to shoot someone would make it all the worse.

#88 chrisj1968

chrisj1968

    copyrighted!! ©

  • 4,296 posts
  • Joined: 17-June 08
  • Location: United States

Posted 05 January 2013 - 18:51

they'll just say thieves need armed guards.


don't be ludicrous on an issue as this. the only ones to make light of this issue would have to be the left. ~semper fidelous

#89 SupportGeek

SupportGeek

    Neowinian

  • 483 posts
  • Joined: 09-July 12

Posted 05 January 2013 - 18:55

So then why did this criminal, who doesn't follow the law, not have a gun? Sorry, reality is, you don't know jack about what regulations can actually do. Look at other nations that are doing better than America, and you will see it works. You want a equal way to defend yourself? Then, this woman should go to jail. The criminal only had a crowbar. Don't need a gun to defend against that. Another crowbar would be just as effective right? Being scared doesnt give you a reason to have deadly force. Be a man, and stop thinking that everyone is out to get you, and that everyone will be armed. This criminal wasn't. Many aren't. Make it harder to get, guns become more expensive, then only big time mobsters would be able to afford them really. It's called supply and demand. Learn basic economics, and you would understand such things. Oh, and if you are going to say something is proven, please, provide that proof. I've seen nothing show that it can't be stopped, but many nations have already shown that it can and does work when it is regulated. Europe, Australia..... I could go on, but I'd like for you to share your proof. It hasn't been tried here... so how can you say that? Please provide proof to your claims.


So your "proof" that gun control MIGHT work is to point to countries that are in no way similar to the US, culturally, geographically, judicially, or demographically and say "See! It worked there!" thats laughable at best, pure ignorance otherwise.

Translation of your argument boils down to this: you have no clue that gun control works in any way shape or form, and you have NOTHING to back up your wild claims.
In fact, you know your position is so weak, your next best defense is to make up ad-hominim attacks on gun enthusiasts claiming they are scared or "not men". Please, go learn something about the topic at hand, you do nothing but continue to make yourself look uninformed in every one of these threads.

It hasn't been tried here... so how can you say that? Please provide proof to your claims.


It has, constantly, Look no further than Chicago and New York City, tightest gun control in the country, highest murder rates too.
Macross lover had a link posted above

#90 JaredFrost

JaredFrost

    Neowinian

  • 1,348 posts
  • Joined: 02-May 04

Posted 05 January 2013 - 19:10

By your logic, he should have given warning before breaking in too, right? You break into my home, it's open season. More places here in the US are adopting "Stand Your Ground" and "castle" laws because no one should have to play nice when the sanctity of their home is violated. Break into someone's home, expect to get shot. No one has to 'give a warning'. Ever.


Actually, he did, he rang the doorbell several times, his intention was to rob an empty house.

But I agree, he entered the house unlawfully, does he deserve to die for it? probably not, but it's an unintented consequence of his life choices.

Didn't freak out, 6 shots with 5 hitting someone in the head isn't freaking out? It looks more like she was trying to murder him than incapacitate him.

You are seriously comparing human beings with morals and ethics against animals?


She panicked and instinct kicked in, so yes, no better than an animal, humans are animals whether you like it or not
Possibly the worst kind of animal, the kind that thinks it has more of a right to live than the other animals.

I can't be the only person who thinks it's wrong to just kill someone because they broke into your home?


That's just it though, she didn't know why he was there, his story, nothing, all she knew is this guy just broke into
her house, already showing he's not an "ethical and moral" human animal.

I've had my house broken into, I have a baseball bat I keep for such situations. I gave the person a warning and he scarpered, I didn't run over and beat him to death with the bat because he dared to break into my home, there is such thing as reasonable and excessive force.


What about all the countries that currently have gun control and only double figure firearm deaths per year compared to the US 10,000+?


Completely different situation, first you're a male and you probably weren't hiding in a closet with your little daughter.

The US is just doing their part to solve over population. :shifty:

------
I'm pretty much on the gun contol side myself, but in this situation, an already worthless human being broke into someones house
for an unknown reason, actions must be taken to ensure you survive, if that means the other person doesn't, so be it.

This is how the world has worked for hundreds of millions of years, way before humans came into the picture and it'll be like that
when our bones are exibits in museums created by hyper-evolved crows.

Also, I can't be the only one that finds it suspicious that she called the husband and his first reaction to someone ringing the doorbell
was, GO HIDE AND CALL THE COP!!, what kind of business is this guy into?.... very suspicious indeed. :shifty: