Jump to content



Photo

Mother-Daughter Porn Duo aim to be filthy rich

florida the sexxxtons facebook pages not incest

  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

#16 DocM

DocM

    Neowinian Senior

  • 17,585 posts
  • Joined: 31-July 10
  • Location: Michigan

Posted 10 January 2013 - 16:27

I'm curious as to what legal issues they are reffering too. Is the government going to try and step in and stop them? Last I checked, it was not the mandate of the US government to interfear with peoples sex lives. Incestuous or not, it's their choice.


First principle: states are given a wide latitude when it comes to home rule, so the Feds don't often get into state criminal law issues unless they go against the Federal interest. What's illegal in one state is often legal in another. In this states are like semi-autonomous "countries" within the larger Federalist structure. This is codified in the 10th Amendment.

In Lawrence v Texas (2003) the US Supreme Cousd ruled that homosexual sodomy was legal. But it did NOT rule that other nominally illegal sexual activities were too by extension; prostitution, incest, polygamy, etc.

Next up; Muth v Frank (7th Circuit Court, 2005.) In Muth a brother & sister incest was prosecuted in Wisconsin. They were convicted and appealed referencing Lawrence

http://caselaw.findl...it/1247048.html

Finding -

Given, therefore, the specific focus in Lawrence on homosexual sodomy, the absence from the Court's opinion of its own “established method” for resolving a claim that a particular practice implicates a fundamental liberty interest, and the absence of strict scrutiny review, we conclude that Lawrence did not announce a fundamental right of adults to engage in all forms of private consensual sexual conduct.


AFAIK the Supreme Court has not ruled on this subject again since Lawrence


#17 Simon-

Simon-

    Neowinian Senior

  • 10,724 posts
  • Joined: 04-November 02

Posted 10 January 2013 - 16:37

I don't see a problem as long as they don't sexually touch each other - that would be gross - and I'm glad that they profess that they would not even want to, that would cross the line in weirdness factor. This taboo theme has been popular in porn but until now it has all been staged as far as I know (hope). I have heard though that there are twin brothers (legitimately twin brothers; not lookalikes) on the homosexual scene who actually DO incest. The homosexuality is fine, but actual incest is really gross.

The only other gross factor/borderline incest is that if they are sharing partners at the same time, they will invariably be sharing bodily fluids of each other off the shared partner. Other than that, lucky guy or girl who gets to do a bona fide mother & daughter at once! Even if still a little bit messed up that they would be having sex near each other at all.

#18 Pupik

Pupik

    Neowinian Senior

  • 6,167 posts
  • Joined: 09-December 05

Posted 10 January 2013 - 16:38

Legal or not; still gross to even think about it.

#19 Tuishimi

Tuishimi

    Michinator

  • 843 posts
  • Joined: 19-November 10
  • OS: Windows 8

Posted 10 January 2013 - 16:56

I think it is wrong... but why is it incest? Wasn't the law designed to prevent inbreeding and potential birth defects?

#20 Praetor

Praetor

    ASCii / ANSi Designer

  • 2,730 posts
  • Joined: 05-June 02
  • Location: Lisbon
  • OS: Windows Eight dot One dot One 1!one

Posted 10 January 2013 - 17:05

disgusting...at least.

#21 Perfect72

Perfect72

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,168 posts
  • Joined: 29-January 04
  • Location: Miss., US
  • OS: Win7 64bit
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 10 January 2013 - 17:15

Clearly a lot of people here haven't gotten to do the mother/daughter duo. :shifty:

This is pretty hilarious though. I'm enjoying the laugh. :D

#22 DocM

DocM

    Neowinian Senior

  • 17,585 posts
  • Joined: 31-July 10
  • Location: Michigan

Posted 10 January 2013 - 19:00

I think it is wrong... but why is it incest? Wasn't the law designed to prevent inbreeding and potential birth defects?


The law has to be gender blind, so it isn't necessary for the participants to be of opposite sexes. Example: women can be, and have been, charged with rape and reproduction is incidental to incest.

#23 Growled

Growled

    Neowinian Senior

  • 41,508 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 11 January 2013 - 00:58

Legal or not; still gross to even think about it.


My thoughts exact. Just yuck.

#24 PGHammer

PGHammer

    Neowinian Senior

  • 8,759 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 03
  • Location: Accokeek, MD
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro with Media Center x64

Posted 11 January 2013 - 01:11

My thoughts exact. Just yuck.


Don't like it? Fine - have nothing to do with it. As long as no laws are broken, all opinions are pretty much moot - outside of the participants.

#25 Shiranui

Shiranui

    Iconoclast

  • 3,867 posts
  • Joined: 24-December 03

Posted 11 January 2013 - 01:44

What is the rationale behind the criminalization of same-sex "incest" between consenting adults -- apart from it being revolting?

A consanguine mother and daughter pr0n team can pound their pudenda together all they like, but it is not going to result in offspring.

#26 FloatingFatMan

FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 15,810 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 11 January 2013 - 13:03

I don't see a problem as long as they don't sexually touch each other - that would be gross - and I'm glad that they profess that they would not even want to, that would cross the line in weirdness factor. This taboo theme has been popular in porn but until now it has all been staged as far as I know (hope). I have heard though that there are twin brothers (legitimately twin brothers; not lookalikes) on the homosexual scene who actually DO incest. The homosexuality is fine, but actual incest is really gross.


There are plenty of cases of identical twin lesbians in the porn industry actually doing each other, as well as partners. It's really not that hard to find it, either.

#27 Guest_xiphi_*

Guest_xiphi_*
  • Joined: --

Posted 11 January 2013 - 13:20

Neither are attractive, and I really wouldn't want to see a 56 year old getting it on. It's just... *shivers*

#28 jerzdawg

jerzdawg

    Neowinian

  • 5,370 posts
  • Joined: 09-October 02
  • Location: new jersey

Posted 11 January 2013 - 13:41

I'm not an expert on porn (LOL! :laugh:) but I don't think people become filthy rich by doing porn. They might make a decent living, but filthy rich? Nah.

While I am sure it's rare to become filthy rich, just head over to an article on Jenna Jamison. She has pretty much built a porn empire and I would certainly put her in the category of filthy rich (this mom/daughter duo will not be so fortunate).

#29 OP Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 62,718 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 11 January 2013 - 14:05

I'll stick to poRn with attractive people. :laugh:

#30 compl3x

compl3x

    Feels good, dunnit?

  • 8,268 posts
  • Joined: 06-December 09
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S4

Posted 11 January 2013 - 14:28

While I am sure it's rare to become filthy rich, just head over to an article on Jenna Jamison. She has pretty much built a porn empire and I would certainly put her in the category of filthy rich (this mom/daughter duo will not be so fortunate).


1 porn star out of . . . fuq knows how many? Odds are certainly against them.