Jump to content



Photo
rumour windows 8 microsoft

  • Please log in to reply
117 replies to this topic

#31 TheLegendOfMart

TheLegendOfMart

    Neowinian Senior

  • 9,281 posts
  • Joined: 01-October 01
  • Location: England

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:25

I'll just leave this here: http://www.neowin.ne...ng-market-share

I don't think your rampant biased fanboyism is going to affect sales, so tone it down a bit, its getting boring.


#32 Dot Matrix

Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Senior

  • 10,447 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: Upstate New York
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:29

I don't think your rampant biased fanboyism is going to affect sales, so tone it down a bit, its getting boring.


Heh. So which source do you believe? The Register, or Neowin?

If you say The Register, you loose. You might as well be quoting Weekly World News. Maybe Bat Boy can help you out with your post?

#33 TheLegendOfMart

TheLegendOfMart

    Neowinian Senior

  • 9,281 posts
  • Joined: 01-October 01
  • Location: England

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:33

I don't believe just one source, I'm just bored of seeing the same Microsoft Defense Force members jumping to attention.

#34 theyarecomingforyou

theyarecomingforyou

    Tiger Trainer

  • 16,303 posts
  • Joined: 07-August 03
  • Location: Terra Prime Profession: Jaded Sceptic
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 3 with Galaxy Gear

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:34

That sounds familiar. Oh, wait...


What I meant was one interface for touch, another for mouse + keyboard. The problem with Windows 8 is that Microsoft tried to make it everything for everyone.

#35 68k

68k

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,881 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 10
  • Location: Australia

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:39

Just wait till the Surface Pro comes out. I think it will be a hot seller.

There's no need for the majority of people to upgrade their Windows 7 machines. However, Windows 8 tablets are a new kettle of fish.

Windows 8 has so far had low sales simply because people don't need to upgrade.

Perhaps Microsoft should change the system requirements for Office 2013 to require a minimum of Windows 8, and introduce yet a new file format, forcing people and companies to upgrade. Yeah right.

I almost forgot: the increased price will lead to even less sales.

I just don't have the passion to upgrade - my current OS does everything I want it to. What else could I want? (Well, a Surface Pro to replace my laptop would be nice!)

#36 Torolol

Torolol

  • 2,903 posts
  • Joined: 24-November 12

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:41

but, but, but,
It was Microsoft who said, that any computer that run on W7 can run W8 too.

#37 PGHammer

PGHammer

    Neowinian Senior

  • 8,723 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 03
  • Location: Accokeek, MD
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro with Media Center x64

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:43

Either that or you could have two separate interfaces. That's up to Microsoft to decide, but the implementation in Windows 8 is a mess (even though I still prefer it as an operating system to Windows 7).


Two separate interfaces are what we have today - what folks are assuming is that touch-first or touch-support means touch-only or even touch-exclusive; that isn't the case with ANY other OS that supports touch (unless it's a hyperniche OS for a specific device - and yes; I am referring *specifically* to Android and iOS).

What I find laughable is that the ONLY folks making such an assumption are the detractors of Windows 8 - those that actually USE the OS (sans Start8 or Classic Shell) don't make that assumption, and those that run Android tablets or iPads (any generation) certainly don't. I run Windows 8 Pro x64 on a desktop - no touch anywhere - and no Start8 or ClassicShell, either. I do *everything* on it I did with 7 - from casual gaming to serious gaming. (Yes - it can run Crysis *and* Crysis 2 - though not both at once.) You would think that Android and iOS didn't support keyboards or mice if the assumption made by Windows 8's detractors were anything close to the truth.

Do you really WANT Windows to become an elite (read - niche) OS confined to non-touch hardware?

#38 Dot Matrix

Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Senior

  • 10,447 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: Upstate New York
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:44

I almost forgot: the increased price will lead to even less sales.


Increased price never stopped Windows 7.

#39 majortom1981

majortom1981

    The crazy one

  • 5,315 posts
  • Joined: 30-November 01

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:45

ALl Microsoft has to do is put back the start menu in desktop mode and add the group policy to allow disable of metro. Doesn't require a whole redesign. I don't mean getting rid of metro but just putting back the start button in desktop mode. Heck they can even make a $9 add on that does it.

#40 PGHammer

PGHammer

    Neowinian Senior

  • 8,723 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 03
  • Location: Accokeek, MD
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro with Media Center x64

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:51

but, but, but,
It was Microsoft who said, that any computer that run on W7 can run W8 too.


Microsoft is dead-right - which is exactly the problem OEMs are facing. They are now competing with the installed base of hardware, and they are preloading an OS that will, for the most part, run just fine ON that hardware. The issues that folks are having with Windows 8 aren't the issues folks had with Windows Vista - on other words, hardware isn't the problem for users.

The issue for OEMS, on the other hand, is that touch support is still not cheap enough where they can eat the cost, and their hardware margins are under pressure from underneath (Android and iOS - mostly Android) - absent touch, they have been forced to recycle 7-era designs which customers are understandably not going to touch. ("Why would I buy hardware no different from what I have already when I can simply upgrade the OS on what I have?")

#41 Geoffrey B.

Geoffrey B.

    LittleNeutrino

  • 15,978 posts
  • Joined: 25-July 05
  • Location: Ohio
  • OS: Windows 8.1u1
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 928 WP8.1

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:57

starting to sound like what Microsoft did when Vista was released. Blame the manufacturer not the overwhelming changes you made to your OS

#42 theyarecomingforyou

theyarecomingforyou

    Tiger Trainer

  • 16,303 posts
  • Joined: 07-August 03
  • Location: Terra Prime Profession: Jaded Sceptic
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 3 with Galaxy Gear

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:58

What I find laughable is that the ONLY folks making such an assumption are the detractors of Windows 8 - those that actually USE the OS (sans Start8 or Classic Shell) don't make that assumption, and those that run Android tablets or iPads (any generation) certainly don't.


How can you say that when you quoted me saying I prefer Windows 8 to Windows 7? Bizarre. :|

Do you really WANT Windows to become an elite (read - niche) OS confined to non-touch hardware?


I want an interface that works well for mouse and keyboard. Touch is great for tablets / laptops but I'll never use touch for a desktop system because I hate fingerprints and can't be doing with constantly cleaning a 30" monitor. I'm more likely to go for something like Kinect or the Leap Motion. It's not "elite" to not want to use touch on a desktop system.

#43 Torolol

Torolol

  • 2,903 posts
  • Joined: 24-November 12

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:58

except MS blaming OEM for W8 underwhelming sales,
not blaming OEM for new PC sales (which some may be pre-installed with w7 instead).

#44 +techbeck

techbeck

    Neowinian Senior

  • 18,177 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 05

Posted 24 January 2013 - 13:04

Relaunch should be interesting. If they don't get a boost from that, then not sure what will.

I find this very skeptical, The Register has always bashed any and all Microsoft products. I wouldn't be surprised if this article was entirely made up or taken drastically out of context.


The Register bashes more than MS. I post The Reg articles from time to time. They tend to be not as serious, a little sarcastic at times, but still get the message a crossed. Its not like The Onion where it is funny and false. And yes, some of the articles can be a little biased but that is anywhere you go these days.

#45 PGHammer

PGHammer

    Neowinian Senior

  • 8,723 posts
  • Joined: 31-August 03
  • Location: Accokeek, MD
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro with Media Center x64

Posted 24 January 2013 - 13:05

Just wait till the Surface Pro comes out. I think it will be a hot seller.

There's no need for the majority of people to upgrade their Windows 7 machines. However, Windows 8 tablets are a new kettle of fish.

Windows 8 has so far had low sales simply because people don't need to upgrade.

Perhaps Microsoft should change the system requirements for Office 2013 to require a minimum of Windows 8, and introduce yet a new file format, forcing people and companies to upgrade. Yeah right.

I almost forgot: the increased price will lead to even less sales.

I just don't have the passion to upgrade - my current OS does everything I want it to. What else could I want? (Well, a Surface Pro to replace my laptop would be nice!)


That's the point I made earlier (in fact, I made the point with the Consumer Preview) Windows 8 runs just fine on 7-era (if not Vista-era, and, in some cases, even XP-era) hardware - that makes selling new hardware that much (pardon the unintended pun) harder - and especially in a bad economy with high-single-digit or higher unemployment. You have to provide new features to sell new hardware - and the one new feature is touch support (be it portables or AIOs). However, touch support is not cheap enough to be eaten by OEMs (who are under horrendous margin pressures); the end result is higher pricing or recycling of the same hardware they sold with Windows 7 on it - any consumer with a clue will look at Windows 8 PCs little to NO different from the Windows 7 (if not older) PC they already have, sneer, and keep right on walking. What USED to require a hardware replacement or upgrade now no longer does, for the most part - and this has been the case since basically Windows Vista; worse for OEMs, the economics are indeed dictating such an approach by customers - from home to enterprise.