59 replies to this topic 4 votes

[TPreston]

Hum, on 24 January 2013 - 16:14, said:

^ Right here is some of that 'evidence' you want.

There are other cases of archeological finds that 'don't fit' your preconceived ideas, if you care to look.

You will always have 'zero evidence' if you choose to ignore it.

Sad to see so many people brainwashed by 'Science'.

That looks great now lets get independent some radiometric dating like the moon rocks

[+littleneutrino]

very cool indeed.

[Slugsie]

Also http://doubtfulnews....th-wheel-silly/

So, show us this evidence then. FYI I have read up on quite a few archaeological finds that appear to defy conventional dating. In each and every case when they have been investigated by someone who actually knows what they're on about they have been revealed to be either simply mistaken, or outright frauds.

How can I be brainwashed by science? The scientific method is by far and away the very best method we have for understanding the world around us. It relies upon testable, repeatable observation and experimentation. When it gets things wrong it also admits it and adjusts accordingly. What other method should we use to understand everything?

[Yazoo]

its not Alien at all, I'm guessing we manage to successfully time travel in the future, with no way back the machines lay rotting millions of years ago. Cue tin foil hats. lol

[Slugsie]

It also appears that the age of the aluminum artefact is only being guessed at by association with the age of the coal deposit. I've not seen any evidence that the artefact itself has been dated (I'm not a scientist so I don't know how that would be done, but some form or radiometric dating is my guess). For all we know right now it's just a piece of quarry machinery that broke off when the coal was being extracted. That seems to be a far more likely explanation given the available facts.

[Tyler R.]

IMO, Ancient humans were much more advanced than we give them credit for.

[panacea]

Slugsie, on 24 January 2013 - 16:41, said:

It also appears that the age of the aluminum artefact is only being guessed at by association with the age of the coal deposit. I've not seen any evidence that the artefact itself has been dated (I'm not a scientist so I don't know how that would be done, but some form or radiometric dating is my guess). For all we know right now it's just a piece of quarry machinery that broke off when the coal was being extracted. That seems to be a far more likely explanation given the available facts.

yeah, i was thinking the same thing. as much as i want to believe in ancient tech civilizations... this explanation is more likely.

why they did not carbon date the tool itself?

[still1]

why does everyone conclude its aliens?? it could be some human like intelligent animal who ruled the earth 315 millions years ago and got extinct by some natural disaster.

lets say some solar flair destroyed the whole earth today and some 500 millions later some intelligent species discover some of our machinery.

totally possible.

[M_Lyons10]

Hm... I don't know, therefore... Aliens...

[syobon999]

I don't think there were anything resembling humans 300 million years ago.

[AngelGraves13]

panacea, on 24 January 2013 - 17:02, said:

yeah, i was thinking the same thing. as much as i want to believe in ancient tech civilizations... this explanation is more likely.

why they did not carbon date the tool itself?

I'm no scientist, but I've taken a few Geology classes and my understanding is that it's difficult to date certain items because of decay and radiation, which can cause additional premature decay of the material.

syobon999, on 24 January 2013 - 17:08, said:

I don't think there were anything resembling humans 300 million years ago.

That we know of...

There's a lot we don't know.

[cybertimber2008]

panacea, on 24 January 2013 - 17:02, said:

why they did not carbon date the tool itself?

You can carbon date something only so far back. According to wikipedia, that limit is 58,000-62,000 years.
However, we can assume they tried and if if failed, that means the found object was NOT from the last 58,000-62,000 years - aka, not a fragment of modern mining machinery.

[Glassed Silver]

Arceles, on 24 January 2013 - 15:01, said:

God dammit.... 300 million year old? that's an age I can't even imagine...

Youngling...

Once you hit my age, those years pass by like flies on a motorcycle...

Glassed Silver:mac

[ILikeTobacco]

[+imachip]

Went to that link for a laugh and got one from this pop up: